lake district canary 4,531 Posted August 24, 2020 I don't know if anyone has bothered to look at the goals Hugill has scored on you tube, but several of them are from through balls similar to the goals Pukki scores, so it is not so very different from what we do anyway. Where Hugill has advantage is in his heading. When Pukki first played for us it was up front with Jordan Rhodes, with Pukki on the left side. With Hugill and Idah at the club, two up front is a real option for this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mannings bandy legs 388 Posted August 24, 2020 2 hours ago, ......and Smith must score. said: This looks a good signing at a fair price. My only slight concern is will the players be able to adapt to a different style when needed, particularly during games ? The Farke system has been relentlessly drummed into the squad and has been pretty inflexible up to now. Maybe Farke does have a Plan ‘ B ‘ after all. To be fair,it does'nt take a lot of planning to launch a ball from the back four up to a unit up front and to get a couple of players up and around him. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Il Pirata 249 Posted August 24, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, All the Germans said: Holt was played on the wing repeatedly for Forest. I'm not the one using Holt, many other people before me have and I just commented that I do not believe that he will be anywhere near that and to even make that comparison is inviting disappointment. Clearly emulating Holt is setting a very high and probably unrealistic bar. But Hugill is a player that so far has been more successful than Holt was at the same career point. Hugill is entering his peak years and should get better still, whilst playing for Norwich! And that's on the back of a 15 goal haul for a mid table championship side. I'm really not sure what's not to like? It's nice to sign decent players at the peak of their careers giving their all for the club. We're showing a bit of ambition - Buying what's good for the club now and not a player with a future fee in mind. Edited August 24, 2020 by Il Pirata Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Top corner 228 Posted August 24, 2020 Sky sports have just confirmed that Hugill has signed permanently on a deal until 2023 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cornish sam 953 Posted August 24, 2020 1 hour ago, Indy said: If this is what Farke & Webber want in our limits, which also needs to be considered, then great. But let’s not get carried away by calling him the new Grant Holt, Holty stepped up to a different level once with us under Lambert. Also this statement from above sums it up, great at this level! Now I understand we need to get out of this league and we need three strikers, he’s proven not to be anywhere near premiership level, so why not loan him? If we go up great then get rid and improve on him, if not then decide to buy! Might not be available for loan I suppose, or the fee could be high, but not 5 million. Like I said great if that’s what we need, but strange one to me, spending a vast amount of our budget on a very non Norwich under Webbertype signing. Or alternatively, we buy him for a low price (which £5m is for a 15 goal championship striker), he helps us get promoted, then we sell him as a good championship striker to a team with more money than sense and turn a profit on him as well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Top corner 228 Posted August 24, 2020 23 minutes ago, Top corner said: Sky sports have just confirmed that Hugill has signed permanently on a deal until 2023 A quote from Hugill “I’m a big, physical presence who will batter a defender around,so quite old school, but I’m also a very powerful striker” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
repman 635 Posted August 24, 2020 Having a physical presence like Hugill up top also means we can play a less physical player in the number 10 role, if Farke so wishes. Stiepermann and Mclean when he played there were both consistently challenging for headers from Krul's kicks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darth Vadis 151 Posted August 24, 2020 David Freezer reckons the initial fee is £2.6m. Add-ons taking it to £5m. Class deal that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,657 Posted August 24, 2020 Reported as £2.6m upfront with addons - presumably the main one being promotion; seems a pretty decent deal to me and a far cry from some of the figures mentioned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,300 Posted August 24, 2020 Definitely far better deal at 2.6 million, if that’s the striker they want in our range then brilliant, look forward to seeing what impact he has. Can only be good to have options and far more happy to see Hugill then rely on Drmic, hope we can move him on now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary dwarf 221 Posted August 24, 2020 ,I think this is a real good signing ,15 goals last season for a bottom half championship side is decent and from the YouTube vid ,it looks like he scores different type of goals ,but a few with his head too ,good price too ,grant holt mark too,did not have high expectations for this season but I have now.otbc😁 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sgncfc 1,228 Posted August 24, 2020 Our version of Mitrovic perhaps, and look what he did to Champs defences last season. Looks like good business to me - adding Gibson or one other central defender would complete it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sonyc 5,518 Posted August 24, 2020 https://www.pinkun.com/norwich-city/norwich-confirm-signing-of-striker-hugill-1-6806168 A point to prove. I like that kind of talk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 3,820 Posted August 24, 2020 2 hours ago, All the Germans said: He is not anywhere near the same class as Iwan or Holt. Just because he puts himself about, it doesn't make him good enough. Anyone who expects anything close to Holt will be massively disappointed. I genuinely hope that he proves me wrong and contributes massively to our success, but I do not believe that is at all likely. Hugill is 28, as was Holt when we signed him. Hugill's career to date easily betters that of Holt at the same point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
All the Germans 1,075 Posted August 24, 2020 1 minute ago, Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man said: Hugill is 28, as was Holt when we signed him. Hugill's career to date easily betters that of Holt at the same point. And that automatically makes him likely to be as good as Holt? I've watched Hugill quite a few times; he is a million miles away from what Holt was for us. I hope I'm wrong and he gets three consecutive player of the seasons for us. He won't though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gordon Bennett 783 Posted August 24, 2020 Is anyone actually suggesting he’ll be as good as Grant Holt? My take from the thread is that he’s a similar type of player, nothing more. The type of player we've been missing for a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mannings bandy legs 388 Posted August 24, 2020 6 minutes ago, All the Germans said: And that automatically makes him likely to be as good as Holt? I've watched Hugill quite a few times; he is a million miles away from what Holt was for us. I hope I'm wrong and he gets three consecutive player of the seasons for us. He won't though. We might be pleasantly surprised. Shall we just wait and see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary dwarf 221 Posted August 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, All the Germans said: And that automatically makes him likely to be as good as Holt? I've watched Hugill quite a few times; he is a million miles away from what Holt was for us. I hope I'm wrong and he gets three consecutive player of the seasons for us. He won't though. Sometime players take time to develop ,take pukki for example he was voted worst Celtic player ever and was a journeyman with not a great goalscoring record ,maybe you watched hugill a few years ago before he developed into what he is now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sonyc 5,518 Posted August 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, Gordon Bennett said: Is anyone actually suggesting he’ll be as good as Grant Holt? My take from the thread is that he’s a similar type of player, nothing more. The type of player we've been missing for a while. He is kind of player that causes a nuisance to defenders, always harassing. He is mobile and strong. I don't much worry about the Grant Holt comparisons. He is his own person. If anything he reminds me of a Cameron Jerome type...busy, a handful and if not scoring, is creating space for others in taking defenders away. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cambridgeshire canary 6,718 Posted August 24, 2020 Can't say the board and Webber arent making any signings now can we? How it all changes in one season 😉 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kick it off 1,952 Posted August 24, 2020 8 minutes ago, All the Germans said: And that automatically makes him likely to be as good as Holt? I've watched Hugill quite a few times; he is a million miles away from what Holt was for us. I hope I'm wrong and he gets three consecutive player of the seasons for us. He won't though. Not disagreeing with your statement he is not in the same class as Holt - honestly, I've not watched enough of Hugill to pass judgement.... but to say you've watched Hugill and therefore he isn't as good as Holt sort of ignores the point that Holt turned into what he was with us. If you'd watched Holt a year or two before he signed for us (when Calderwood had him playing on the right at Forest for example), would you have said he was going to turn into a player that was good enough to score 17 in the Prem? There's a reason we were able to sign Holt for 400k in League One - his career before us was significantly poorer than he was for us.... I'm not saying Hugill is the same, but surely you have to acknowledge the possibility that he COULD turn into that for us? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hps2031a 2 Posted August 24, 2020 He’s another option to Pukki and Idah, and gives us more threat up top. After some early negative thoughts on the recruitment, things are starting to take shape, admittedly still wish for a centre back or two, and as yet nobody has departed, but certainly don’t think its all done yet. Fingers crossed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TeemuVanBasten 3,327 Posted August 24, 2020 (edited) 35 minutes ago, All the Germans said: And that automatically makes him likely to be as good as Holt? I'd take a new Steve Morison if the alternative is a Drmic. Edited August 24, 2020 by TeemuVanBasten Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheGunnShow 5,940 Posted August 24, 2020 1 hour ago, mannings bandy legs said: To be fair,it does'nt take a lot of planning to launch a ball from the back four up to a unit up front and to get a couple of players up and around him. Paradoxically, a bit of that is something we could use if an opposing team is having a lot of success with a high press. Sure, we prefer to keep the ball and tidily play through the middle, but if that's practically all we do, we become easier to pick off. Premiership teams picked up on that and forced a lot of turnovers in dangerous places as a result. Factor in a decided lack of physicality up top and the ball wouldn't stick up there for too long, so the defence was repeatedly put back under pressure. Sometimes simplicity has a genius all of its own. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward 3 372 Posted August 24, 2020 Yaaay what great news 😔 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TeemuVanBasten 3,327 Posted August 24, 2020 2 hours ago, hogesar said: Ask Forest fans what they thought of Holt. I have no idea if he'll be any good but Holt isn't a good example to use in your argument because he'd never performed well above the third tier of English football until he came to us. I'm not siding with the person you are quoting here, I like this signing a lot. But actually a lot of Forest fans will say that Grant Holt was their best player in League One and they can't believe that Calderwood, a manager that they were very glad to see the back of, played Grant Holt on the right wing after promotion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cambridgeshire canary 6,718 Posted August 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, Ward 3 said: Yaaay what great news 😔 "why arent we signing players?" "Oh no we are signing players" this fanbase confuses me sometimes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drazen Muzinic 1,445 Posted August 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said: "why arent we signing players?" "Oh no we are signing players" this fanbase confuses me sometimes Schrödinger's fanbase 🤔 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ward 3 372 Posted August 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said: "why arent we signing players?" "Oh no we are signing players" this fanbase confuses me sometimes I meant to put a smiling face 😄, I wasn't too excited the other day but to be fair he's actually pretty decent and scores different goals to what we're used to. Maybe farke is going to have a proper plan b Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
keelansgrandad 6,679 Posted August 24, 2020 We certainly looked outmuscled last season and many of us thought that was one of our downfalls. So we have brought in someone who rather than shy away from a challenge actually looks forward to them. Despite our passing game there is still room for a different approach when needed. Last season when Pukki dried up we didn't have an adequate replacement especially in the EPL. Now it appears we have one for the Championship. And that the league we are going to be playing in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites