LaUnionCanary

That's appropriate on this board.

Great idea so long as we avoid relegation. Get relegated and we have blown £20m. Logic says we will be better served by selling him in this window if he will not sign a contract extension. That is the crux of the situation, a new contract.

Elvis.

We didn't buy him. Keep up.

As did Darren Huckerby.

I would guess that many on here will not know what you are referring to when mentioning Boleyn. The pub on the corner with the same name was dangerous even on a non match night, only went in twice before deciding abstinence was a better option.

It amazes me that all posters here are incapable of factoring the cost of salary into the financial spectrum. We buy a player for £10m on a four year contract at £25,000 a week. The total cost of this deal is in fact £15m without any possible salary increase in that time. We have a transfer budget, but that does include all aspects of financial costs. At least I would assume so.

Loan season I was very impresed, buy him for £1m, nothing since.

Post before this, Tilly, was five hours ago and problem still no rectified. Very annoying.

Our greatest goalie is not on that list. I refer, of course, to Michael Theoklitoris.

Michael Bailey has apparently said in the Athletic that Raschica had offers with more pay but DF convinced him his career would be better served at City. Also DF has said that he will play across the front line and a back five is likely, so possibly 5-3-2 by the sound of that.

I'm 77 and I do the hash house harriers run/walk out here in the Philippines on Saturday afternoons. The temperature is usually between 34 and 38° and humidity to match. Last Saturday I completed 7.5km including a steep hill about 400 foot high. But then I am not a pampered pussey footballer.

I'm guessing the idea was tongue in cheek banter. I certainly would be very much against the idea.

Plus add ons (20% I believe ) owed to Getafe for profit from Emis sale = £7m approx. Not sure of the situation with any add ons for Max. Todd of course is one of our own.

I would assume legally whatever Norwich City do on the pitch is their copyright and would be able to re-produce same as they see fit. But who knows what hold the EPL lawyers have managed to finagle to benefit the system for the good of the EPL.

Status Quo are buying the club?

Yeah, Oliveira when he was at Reading, stamped on his face. Got away with that as well.

Have they got it rent free then? And they will certainly be responsible for maintenance and upkeep at the very least. Good luck to them in the playoffs.

One thing I will not miss, but at the same time will miss, is the multiple mid week games. Any time from 1.30am up to 4.00 am for me. Not conducive to a good sleep pattern.

I assume you were USAF at the time stationed where?

Yeah, wtf is a "Shakespearian fulcrum".

Not sure of your logic here. Dowell has not done enough but is improving with each match, but you want us to go out and spend money for a new #10, meaning Dowell would not get game time to improve? I believe he will be very good in the EPL next season.

Fairly certain Sorensen will start on Saturday. To me, he is more of a Bobby Moore player than Jack Charlton. Meaning he reads the game so well be gets in position in time to stop attacks with no apparent rush. One iconic Italian defender, I cannot remember who, said that it he had to make a tackle then he had made a mistake.

Not sure why you want to punish the (innocent, for once) footballers. But surely the owners do not now qualify as owners under the fit and proper, or whatever, so should be disqualified from owning a club.

For Skipp, replace with Mowatt? Aarons almost certainly will not be with us any more.