InLambertWeTrust! 0 Posted May 6, 2009 [quote user="No Quarter"]YESSSSSSS[/quote]FOYSC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Binky 0 Posted May 6, 2009 Yes I''d go with Gunn - but for a very limited period during which his team would have to perform. Shackell, McDonald, Mooney, Lee, Gow - even Cureton - and Fotheringham - all great decisions by Gunn IMO and all bar the last had to be taken quickly. (Killin a rubbish one and maybe Pattison should have been allowed a chance ),Tactically he showed his inexperience - but he inherited a depleted side and consequently was not allowed the luxury of a settled side when injuries came. He had no real team captain.He may not be the right man to manage in the Championship but I''d give him a chance to build a tough hardworking team in Div 1around the likes of Lee If we got the likes of Jewell or Ince in now and they also failed on the available budget - who do we blame then? Right now I think changes at Board level - and the Chief Exec - would be more effeective in bringing in new ideas and strategies, than sacking Gunn. His share of the blame for the current mess is relatively small. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shaun Tilly Lace 0 Posted May 6, 2009 It''s a NO for me. He has already proved that he doesn''t have the credentials for the job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NR6Canary 0 Posted May 6, 2009 No no no - get him back behind glass in corporate before we`re in the conference and can`t afford glass Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grantroederdisaster 0 Posted May 6, 2009 [quote user="WiMMiT"]''Want'' is a strong word.I think that Gunn should be given a chance to build a team. Do people honestly believe that gunny & crook et al, would cling onto their positions even if it jeopardised the future of NCFC? No of course not.On that basis; I would like to see them given the summer to recruit, and 3 months of the season to see how it pans out, and if it we''re not in the playoff positions by then, i expect them to fall on their sword in a dignified manner.So, I guess that is: Yes.[/quote] Couldn''t of put it better myself! While I''m far from concvinced about Gunns abilities as a manager I''m also far from convinced that hes no good! Most of our best times in our history have been with managers appointed from within. Roedernowhere was appointed cause he was experienced!!!! I''d seriously doubt whether anyone else would of done that much better in the poisoned chalice that Gunn inherited. I just think we''ve that at this moment in time the club needs some continuity in the manager, a manager that is honest, has experienced backing and someone who''ll know when its time to get out if its not working! If I was the board I''d give Gunn the job for 23 games (half the season). If we''re below 12th in the League after 23 games then he should go if we are 12th or above then he should be given till the end of the season. If at the end of the season we''re not in the top 8 then Gunn should go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
In Dubious Battle 0 Posted May 6, 2009 No but i''m getting sick and tired of the vitriol some on this board spout about him. The decline of this club started when worthington was still manager and is the responsibility of the board i.e lack of investment, poor decisions etc. Bryan Gunn loves this club as much as any of us and tried his best. That wasn''t good enough and he shouldn''t get the job but FFS leave the bloke alone he''s a NCFC legend. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Don,tPanic 0 Posted May 6, 2009 FFS Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
John Boubepo 0 Posted May 6, 2009 Big fat yes from me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lurkio 0 Posted May 6, 2009 I would say no worse win percentage than grant Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Humphrey 13 Posted May 6, 2009 No and should not be anywhere near the playing side of the club. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shareholder-fairy 0 Posted May 7, 2009 YES Gunn and co should be appointed asap we are losing valuable time in the transfer market Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InLambertWeTrust! 0 Posted May 7, 2009 [quote user="shareholder-fairy"]YES Gunn and co should be appointed asap we are losing valuable time in the transfer market[/quote]FOYSC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JJ 0 Posted May 7, 2009 No. Keep him behind the scenes as an ambassador, or working with Football in the Community. He hasn''t been a success in player recruitment, goalkeeping coach or as manager. Not all his fault, but we need a boss who is proven in the lower leagues. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted May 7, 2009 A big fat ....................NO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foxy is a Pleasure 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Depends if we can get Gannon or Robins.. If we can then no. But I dont see the point in changing things unless the right mans available. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time to go Delia 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Lets be honest only this pathetic club would even consider Gunn , the mans a joke as a manager . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iwan is God 0 Posted May 7, 2009 NO!! I would like to see Robins or Ince appointed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GRIFFTER45 0 Posted May 7, 2009 A second big fat ....................NO!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellafella 0 Posted May 7, 2009 yeah but no but............ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reggie Strayshun 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Definitely not,but I''ve got this sneaking feeling he''s going to get the nod. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites