norfolkngood 1,087 Posted January 20 (edited) Gibson in !! and Barnes ! open in Midfield i can only see us losing with that line up Edited January 20 by norfolkngood Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert N. LiM 4,385 Posted January 20 (edited) deleted - Kiwi Scot got there before me. Edited January 20 by Robert N. LiM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,322 Posted January 20 I’m sorry but he is a complete idiot. Nunez our best midfielder. Sara has his vest game for weeks when pushed forward. But no sodding Barnes behind Sargent leaving us exposed in midfield again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cambridgeshire canary 6,735 Posted January 20 Just now, Jim Smith said: I’m sorry but he is a complete idiot. Nunez our best midfielder. Sara has his vest game for weeks when pushed forward. But no sodding Barnes behind Sargent leaving us exposed in midfield again. You forgetting Nunez played only a few days ago? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert N. LiM 4,385 Posted January 20 Good to see Dimi back. I'd have Nunez for Barnes, but other than that it's ok. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,609 Posted January 20 Just now, cambridgeshire canary said: You forgetting Nunez played only a few days ago? So did Sara? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norfolkngood 1,087 Posted January 20 Just now, Jim Smith said: I’m sorry but he is a complete idiot. Nunez our best midfielder. Sara has his vest game for weeks when pushed forward. But no sodding Barnes behind Sargent leaving us exposed in midfield again. Throw in Gibson at CB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rock bus 854 Posted January 20 Every time I have a bit of hope we are moving forward, Wagner ruins it. Why do Nunez and McCallum get dropped no matter how well they play? Why do Barnes and Gibson get played no matter how rubbish they’ve been? 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken Hairy 3,773 Posted January 20 1 hour ago, Capt. Pants said: Looking forward to the social side (beer), the game is normally secondary 😉 Yep, can tell I think it's going to be a long slog too as I'm on the Gin 😁. This has 0-0 all over it for me (that should guarantee a goal fest ensues 🤣) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norfolkngood 1,087 Posted January 20 Sorensen Nunez Sara Kenny CB i would have been more hopeful like that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary 1,768 Posted January 20 Unless we're playilng a 3 man midfield, McLean shouldnt be in the team unless he's at the back. Wagner has ducked making the big choice we know should have been made between Nunez and McLean 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,301 Posted January 20 1 hour ago, cambridgeshire canary said: Jokes aside given they're in the top two a draw against them isn't a bad result They were ****e then, not sure they’re that poor now! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Peregrine Shorts 315 Posted January 20 The tombola machine spins again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike w 46 Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, rock bus said: Every time I have a bit of hope we are moving forward, Wagner ruins it. Why do Nunez and McCallum get dropped no matter how well they play? Why do Barnes and Gibson get played no matter how rubbish they’ve been? Before I saw the team I was going for 3-1, but having now seen this set up we might score 1 but not 3. Absolutely agree with your comments. Barnes slows down the play and is not quick enough. optomisitic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarydan23 4,060 Posted January 20 He really is a ****ing moron. Nunez has been one of our best performers and is one of our fittest players. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Feedthewolf 4,846 Posted January 20 8 minutes ago, rock bus said: Every time I have a bit of hope we are moving forward, Wagner ruins it. Why do Nunez and McCallum get dropped no matter how well they play? Why do Barnes and Gibson get played no matter how rubbish they’ve been? To be fair, I thought Barnes had a really good game against Hull. Right, off to the ground... COYY! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mason 47 1,382 Posted January 20 2 hours ago, Mason 47 said: Happy birthday Hog. Don't happy clap too hard now, ya hear? Team I'd like to see- Gunn Stacey Duffy McLean McSam Sorenson Sara Nunez Rowe Sainz Sargent Foregoing the argument over the best LB, I believe this to be the best setup possible with these players. I doubt it will be though, I had to laugh at the official club 'predict the lineup' thing from yesterday- it'll be the usual 4-2-4 with Barnes up front. Easiest bet going. Hopefully I win the signed football. Head says plucky defeat. Heart says weird 1-0 win with a slice of luck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,322 Posted January 20 7 minutes ago, GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary said: Unless we're playilng a 3 man midfield, McLean shouldnt be in the team unless he's at the back. Wagner has ducked making the big choice we know should have been made between Nunez and McLean No. The problem is shoe horning in Barnes. Kenny and Nunez should both play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grumpy 122 Posted January 20 I was really hoping that he would be trying McLean and Sorensen in midfield with Sara in the no10 role Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
norfolkngood 1,087 Posted January 20 Against strong in form teams you have to pack midfield not let them run at will at Gibson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,609 Posted January 20 Feels like a worst of both worlds team. If he wants to play Barnes then surely you just set up like you did against Hull again? Instead we get McLean back into midfield and Barnes in at 10 meaning we're back to the deeply ineffective set up we had v Millwall. Don't get it at all. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Samwam27 527 Posted January 20 Imo that line up.weakens our defence and weakens our midfield. Weve played much bettter wirh Mclean in defence and to me we could go with Sorenson in midfield to iffer more protection 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary 1,768 Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, Jim Smith said: No. The problem is shoe horning in Barnes. Kenny and Nunez should both play. Hence why i said 'unless we're playing a 3 man midfield'. If we're not and its a straight fight between nunez and mclean , there 'should' only be one winner Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,301 Posted January 20 Gibson & Barnes why! Barnes has been chuffing awful, far better playing McLean at the back and playing Nunez & Gibbs and psh Sara up to ten! McCallum has been far better recently and doesn’t deserve to be dropped. ****e team selection in my opinion! We shall see! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike w 46 Posted January 20 6 minutes ago, Grumpy said: I was really hoping that he would be trying McLean and Sorensen in midfield with Sara in the no10 role I fully agree. Too easy decision for Wagner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,410 Posted January 20 Yep, chopping and changing looks good theoretically, but practically momentum counts for more. That midfield is just nonsense. Nacho had changed things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
By Hook or Ian crook 917 Posted January 20 29 minutes ago, KiwiScot said: Arguably our strongest 11. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Monty13 2,235 Posted January 20 Don’t like this setup and personnel choice, but still hopeful we can get a result. Lot of weight on Sarges shoulders. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,410 Posted January 20 (edited) 2 minutes ago, By Hook or Ian crook said: Arguably our strongest 11. I'll argue with you on that! No Nacho & Big Sam, and includes Barnes. Edited January 20 by shefcanary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
