norfolkngood

Exactly i imagine Man Utd or chelsea would be happy to spend 60 mill on either of those two compared what they have paid for players Like Anthony or Mykhailo Mudryk

If Ipswich fluff the chance of Automatic spot , lose in the play offs and we go up would be the biggest laugh ever

i agree ownership has moved on in the modern game

i thought he worked for government before the photography ,have you ever seen the those cameras in the bond films ha !

that would have been a total nightmare ! unless he really was James bond and won 150 million in a poker game and ploughed it into the club

yes i am sure MA and businessmen have the legal eagles will be all over it what they can and cannot do , i have a feeling since this Started i do not know how long MA will stick around no evidence but if he is buying into the club fairly cheaply then he may flip to a investor who is in the group ?

seems as if it is sort of sailing close to the 3rd party ownership that used to happen with players from south America ?

Attanasio's group have now formally been allotted 195,012 shares, which will see his shareholding rise from 21.5pc to 40pc. The American has spent £5m ($6.02m) on the shares. The agreement also saw Attanasio's group provide the club with a £33.64m debt payment package that has helped to ease the burden on their financial situation so he has paid around 25 pound a share 18.5 pc only cost 5 million is only about 25 / 30 million for the club seems cheap to me ? the debt of 33.64 mil must be a loan that will be wiped off unless he is going to get the club very cheaply ? i know i am thick it seems i am missing something

i think the bigger worry is we must have scouted him must of liked him and someone must of thought he was good enough ! SVH not being good enough even though we have not seen enough of him is not the main problem here for me , The main Problem knapper and his staff had months of searching the world of football for a striker and he came up with SVH , not talking about splashing millions but i am sure we could of got better value for money than someone who hardly ever plays even when striker is substituted ,

look like he has just put his jacket back on "That's Webber taken care of who is next ? "

For me someone who plays in Barnes position he has to create or score more , Having said that if he is bringing out the best of Sarge i can understand not changing system , my thoughts are a winning team should not be changed , Rowe is one if not the best player i understand but if we are winning then keep it as it is , we might be better with Rowe instead of Barnes or we could be worse again big call for Wagner

i get your point hopefully his injury can be managed we need him for sure i think i read a interview that he sad sometimes days after games it is at its worse

Not complaining wagner and medical team know far more than i do , just saying i think i would have benched him after a tough week and this injury that seems to keep flaring up

Sarge has not fully recovered from his injury which kept him out i would say

i know we have not got play offs in bag yet but sarge might have another 5-6 games where he is needed, i think because he missed training through he could of been benched i do agree we need him though without him upfront we look a totally different side