lake district canary 4,830 Posted January 23, 2023 Now that is funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norfolk Dan 336 Posted January 23, 2023 The new Perfect Hatrick! ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dylanisabaddog 6,143 Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, Norfolk Dan said: The new Perfect Hatrick! ? One at the front post, one at the back post and one with the head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
keelansgrandad 6,680 Posted January 23, 2023 Cuthbert obviously not well endowed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheGunnShow 7,377 Posted January 23, 2023 On me head, Harder! 😉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lake district canary 4,830 Posted January 23, 2023 Good grief, I've looked at the origins of this, a match against West Ham and see it has caused a backlash. The Sun originally reported it and caused upset with women's groups. But it is genuinely funny......on a par with "The batman's Holding the bowler's Willie" from cricket a few years ago. Just funny, not s€xist or any other "ist". Would it be as funny if the names were male footballers names, probably not, but so what? It may not be PC in some quarters, but that doesn't take away from the fact that is genuinely funny. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Inch High aka Inchy.. 417 Posted January 23, 2023 Brilliant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dylanisabaddog 6,143 Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, lake district canary said: Good grief, I've looked at the origins of this, a match against West Ham and see it has caused a backlash. The Sun originally reported it and caused upset with women's groups. But it is genuinely funny......on a par with "The batman's Holding the bowler's Willie" from cricket a few years ago. Just funny, not s€xist or any other "ist". Would it be as funny if the names were male footballers names, probably not, but so what? It may not be PC in some quarters, but that doesn't take away from the fact that is genuinely funny. Well said. Funny is funny, it really is that simple. We should be able to laugh at everything. In fact it's about all we have at the moment! PS Dean Smith wasn't funny Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GodlyOtsemobor 2,830 Posted January 23, 2023 Poor old cuthy, always just short an inch 😂 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Petriix 3,219 Posted January 23, 2023 It would be equally funny with any gender or sport; these are surnames after all. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary Wundaboy 1,423 Posted January 23, 2023 2 hours ago, lake district canary said: Good grief, I've looked at the origins of this, a match against West Ham and see it has caused a backlash. The Sun originally reported it and caused upset with women's groups. But it is genuinely funny......on a par with "The batman's Holding the bowler's Willie" from cricket a few years ago. Just funny, not s€xist or any other "ist". Would it be as funny if the names were male footballers names, probably not, but so what? It may not be PC in some quarters, but that doesn't take away from the fact that is genuinely funny. It's funny because of the names and the order, whether it was a woman's match or a men's match it would be funny either way. It isn't sexist whatsoever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FenwayFrank 2,717 Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) We're going to follow this week's Chelsea game hoping for Harder to, er, score again aren't we? Edited January 23, 2023 by FenwayFrank Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Naturalcynic 817 Posted January 23, 2023 Have the Canaries Trust confirmed whether or not it’s funny? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OnDaBall 141 Posted January 23, 2023 If we aren't allowed to laugh at this, we may as well all just go and sit in silence in caves, scared to open our mouths or communicate in any way. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Paddons Beard 2,791 Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) Is this a record for laughing emoji’s? Fantastic effort Dylan 😂 Edited January 23, 2023 by Graham Paddons Beard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chicken 3,086 Posted January 23, 2023 7 hours ago, lake district canary said: Good grief, I've looked at the origins of this, a match against West Ham and see it has caused a backlash. The Sun originally reported it and caused upset with women's groups. But it is genuinely funny......on a par with "The batman's Holding the bowler's Willie" from cricket a few years ago. Just funny, not s€xist or any other "ist". Would it be as funny if the names were male footballers names, probably not, but so what? It may not be PC in some quarters, but that doesn't take away from the fact that is genuinely funny. I had a look too, in all honesty, it'd have been funnier if that was the actual order in which the goals were scored... seems a bit meh now that I know they weren't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB 1,223 Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) 38 minutes ago, chicken said: I had a look too, in all honesty, it'd have been funnier if that was the actual order in which the goals were scored... seems a bit meh now that I know they weren't. Now you have gone and spoilt it............although at least the Chelsea goals were scored in the order stated......... Edited January 23, 2023 by Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted January 23, 2023 9 hours ago, lake district canary said: Good grief, I've looked at the origins of this, a match against West Ham and see it has caused a backlash. The Sun originally reported it and caused upset with women's groups. But it is genuinely funny......on a par with "The batman's Holding the bowler's Willie" from cricket a few years ago. Just funny, not s€xist or any other "ist". Would it be as funny if the names were male footballers names, probably not, but so what? It may not be PC in some quarters, but that doesn't take away from the fact that is genuinely funny. Indeed, it’s just all too much does my head in, it’s funny and should be seen as such! Humour is subjective and this isn’t offensive language. PS I don’t want be pedantic but Batman wasn’t playing! 😂😉👍 it was the batsman’s. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,955 Posted January 23, 2023 4 minutes ago, ron obvious said: Despite the cheers after, you know some in the audience still didn't get the joke! 😀 BTW, PJ is a brilliant artist! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ron obvious 1,711 Posted January 23, 2023 She can't get her usual power singing such low notes which makes it a bit difficult to hear the lyrics. Utterly filthy though. I love it!😜 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrD66M 149 Posted January 24, 2023 18 hours ago, lake district canary said: Good grief, I've looked at the origins of this, a match against West Ham and see it has caused a backlash. The Sun originally reported it and caused upset with women's groups. But it is genuinely funny......on a par with "The batman's Holding the bowler's Willie" from cricket a few years ago. Just funny, not s€xist or any other "ist". Would it be as funny if the names were male footballers names, probably not, but so what? It may not be PC in some quarters, but that doesn't take away from the fact that is genuinely funny. Better than the prank someone pulled on Lineker live on telly, because this was not a prank and every time something naturally happens like this it makes me chuckle 🤣 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
