Newton 0 Posted December 28, 2014 With this midfield set up we qare going nowhere = yes we fortunately beat a very poor Wigan team 1-0But with exactlly the same team & tactics we haveLost to Notts Forrest awayDrew first half at home to HuddersfieldLet in 2 against derby in 53 minsLet in 2 in first half todayADAMS IT DONT WORK U FOOLWe must start every game with either Redmond or Hooly in team (if not both)Only an idiot leaves all our attacking flair on the benchAdams its time to go & take Delia with youFalling income year on year - this club is on a downward spiral with those 2 in post Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary 2,035 Posted December 28, 2014 ...apparantly not....there are plenty on these forums who seem to favour this midfield away from home .....(and even for some at home).....as it apparantly enables us to "keep it tight in the first half ...and then make changes and go for the kill in the second".....of course this plan rather falls down somewhat if we go behind in a match.lets see how many are championing this approach for the next game?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tony Cottee Woz Ere . . . 0 Posted December 28, 2014 It was a negative, cowardly, Hughtonesque line up and approach that got exactly what it deserved. Not very in keeping with Neeyul''s ''We''re going to play to our strengths and attack teams from the off'' guff that he has continually spouted along with many other empty, ill advised pr statements to keep the deluded happy clappers dribbling. He is so out of his depth it''s embarrassing. Still it''s not his fault he has been thrust into a position he had no right in being in the first place. What a shambles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary Wundaboy 1,423 Posted December 28, 2014 Attack is the best form of defence in this league. When we are going forward we look like league-winners. When we''re going backwards we''re an utter shambles. Adam''s needs to see that and play to our strengths, not really on a tight defence because this team just isn''t up to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted December 28, 2014 If i was Redmond i wouldnt hang around at NCFC for too long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kanadyan Kanary 129 Posted December 28, 2014 I like the fact that when we lose, it''s down to Adams'' tactical naivety but when we win it''s all down to Phelan''s influence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary 2,035 Posted December 28, 2014 [quote user="CJRV 2014"]If i was Redmond i wouldnt hang around at NCFC for too long.[/quote]couldnt agree more....Redmond is one of the most powerful weapons in this league.....yet we have a manager who apparantly cannot find a away of incorporating him into our team. thats failing on the managers part......Redmond may aswell be sitting on the bench at a Premier League club like Southampton or Stoke than sit on the bench here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Year of the tiger 66 Posted December 28, 2014 I thought it was all down to Phelan..oh yes that''s right that was when we won. I suppose he must have been missing today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted December 28, 2014 Would start for every team in this division and even a handfull of prem sides every week. But not for us. Just poor. Just dont understand. Had to come on and change the game vs Huddersfield and Derby. And was good when starting vs Millwall. That 4 CMs has only worked once and that was against the only team in the league on a worse run than us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Wal 315 Posted December 28, 2014 We seem to have some very nice pieces of a jigsaw but unfortunately they just won''t fit together.It almost looks as if we have the pieces of two, or even three jigsaws, but not the pieces to create the final puzzle that we need.Too many of our players are not complimenting other players and are not being complemented by other players.It needs a shake up and that could well mean getting rid of some of the ''better'' players to improve the overall team.And, as anyone who does jigsaws knows, if the pieces don''t fit, whatever you do you can''t force them into place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted December 28, 2014 - Redmond HAS to start- Howson needs to be in the middle- Need to fit Hoolahan into the side- 4 CMs please no more- Martin isnt a CBRuddyWhittaker Bennett Cuellar OlssonRedmond Tettey Howson JohnsonHooper Jerome Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted December 28, 2014 most combinations that we logically have available to us can beat any team in this league, even when we have 4 centre mids playing, however why make it harder for yourself? I wish this question was put to Adams. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 457 Posted December 28, 2014 just back from this ''home'' fixture and saying We must start every game with either Redmond or Hooly in team (if not both) FYI Hooly is not the answer if he plays as he did today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary 2,035 Posted December 28, 2014 i can''t see what the complication is ??i think its generally agreed that if we play 2 strikers,Redmond and Hoolahan in the team , we were too open.On the other hand ,when we ,like we did in the first half today, play 4 central midfielders , we''re too negative as we have no width,pace or creativity to link the midfield to the attack.the happy medium was the one which we played only 48 HOURS AGO !!...by play with Redmond as an out and out winger on one side,with Johnson counter balancing it on the left..................ad then today Adams decides to change that side which won 6-1..unbelievable Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted December 28, 2014 Not really, they went with the team which should have performed but yet again were not at the races. I fully praised the players on Friday today they didn''t turn up. Even Redmond and Wes were lachlustre again when they came on.Down to our inconsistant performances this year.2014 has been frustrating to say the least and I for one can''t see us threatening to top 2, it will be good just to finish top 6.Not being negative just realistic that tjis squad does have the tallent on paper but can''t deliver on a consistant bases.I''ll keep my fingers crossed for continuing winning at home and hope to pick up enough points to get into the top 6. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland Canary 78 Posted December 28, 2014 As must have become obvious to all this is the natural outcome of the board''s managerial appointment strategy. If we had appointed Lennon we would be heading back to the PL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tony Cottee Woz Ere . . . 0 Posted December 28, 2014 No question of that Highland. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 11,136 Posted December 28, 2014 Yes there is! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted December 28, 2014 That makes me laugh when people are so sure......never any gaurantees to whoever is the manager.Our performance today didn''t deserve anything. But other games we have played we should have won.....it wouldn''t have mattered who was on the sideline.We have to accept that we have a big squad off good players who for whatever reason can''t be consistant.The one thing we are missing is a leader on the pitch that I do believe needs addressing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newton 0 Posted December 28, 2014 Indy - the one thing we are missing is a Manager with any tactical nouceFirst 10 games he went gung-ho all out attack did well until teams worked out how to play usNext 8 games - absolutely clueless as far as tactics were concerned, results appealingLast 8 games results improved, gone ultra negative, but not good enoughDelia why is he still there - he don''t know what he is doing ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 8,754 Posted December 29, 2014 I did do a double take when the team was announced- I understand games are coming thick and fast but who changes a team that won 6-1? Baffling decision but not the first this season and not exactly unexpected. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted December 29, 2014 [quote user="king canary"]I did do a double take when the team was announced- I understand games are coming thick and fast but who changes a team that won 6-1? Baffling decision but not the first this season and not exactly unexpected.[/quote]Cueller is injured, and Tettey suits the tactical formation we prefer, especially away from home.That baffling? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary001 0 Posted December 29, 2014 [quote user="Newton"]Indy - the one thing we are missing is a Manager with any tactical nouceFirst 10 games he went gung-ho all out attack did well until teams worked out how to play usNext 8 games - absolutely clueless as far as tactics were concerned, results appealingLast 8 games results improved, gone ultra negative, but not good enoughDelia why is he still there - he don''t know what he is doing ?[/quote]Couldnt agree more Newton , he is in a job because Delia and Hubby wanted him and however badly we do this season he will still be here for the same reason . No he hasnt got a clue , his level is managing a school football team , worst manager City have had for years and arrogant with it , blames everything but his 5hit management . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 851 Posted December 29, 2014 [quote user="GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary"]i can''t see what the complication is ??i think its generally agreed that if we play 2 strikers,Redmond and Hoolahan in the team , we were too open.On the other hand ,when we ,like we did in the first half today, play 4 central midfielders , we''re too negative as we have no width,pace or creativity to link the midfield to the attack.the happy medium was the one which we played only 48 HOURS AGO !!...by play with Redmond as an out and out winger on one side,with Johnson counter balancing it on the left..................ad then today Adams decides to change that side which won 6-1..unbelievable[/quote].. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted December 29, 2014 I am seriously wondering just how many appreciate that there is a difference in playing a game away from home, as opposed to at home.Really people? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newton 0 Posted December 29, 2014 Those that go to games see with there eyes the difference the team plays with either Hooly or Redmond in the teamBasically yes it is foolish to play both as is opens up midfield, Millwall had there best spell when we had those 2 on the pitch and 2 forwardsWhat most of us can see is that u can only play one up top if u play Hooly (he needs to be behind the striker for goodness sake and not left wind a la Reading), or u can play 2 forwards with Redmond on the right as MillwallOne plays the other on the bench to come on later - to not start with either & keep throwing both on at half time is stupid - is it a ploy to give the opposition a head start before we smash them ?This highlights again that he is clueless, as a defensive set up in midfield does not keep the game tight as performances show Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted December 29, 2014 Morty talking about our tactics away from home. The only time 4 midfielders gas worked was vs Wigan who were on a worse run than us. We had to bring Redmond on to change things vs Huddersfield and Derby. Arguably the best player in this division and our manager cant find a way of getting him in. I understand wanting to change tactics for some away games but we were playing a poor Reading side. Why dont we try taking the game to them. We went with 4 midfielders away from home and conceded 2 goals again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 10,762 Posted December 29, 2014 Not sure about the rest of this thread - but I agree that Redmond needs to be incorporated into the starting line-up.Not only is he something none of the top teams in this division can match - like someone said, if he''s sitting on the bench here for every away game he might as well go do that for Southampton with a massive pay-rise and potentially a better place to develop.Again, quite simply I think we''ve been naive in thinking because playing 4 central midfielders has worked a couple of times, it''ll continue to work. The art to management is changing things BEFORE they fail. It''s hard but i''d have thought with confidence now re-installed and the back 4 looking far more solid than previously it''d be right to start playing at least one out-and-out winger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newton 0 Posted December 29, 2014 Hogesar HOORARThats exactly how I feel - u have got it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted December 29, 2014 [quote user="CJRV 2014"]Morty talking about our tactics away from home. The only time 4 midfielders gas worked was vs Wigan who were on a worse run than us. We had to bring Redmond on to change things vs Huddersfield and Derby. Arguably the best player in this division and our manager cant find a way of getting him in. I understand wanting to change tactics for some away games but we were playing a poor Reading side. Why dont we try taking the game to them. We went with 4 midfielders away from home and conceded 2 goals again.[/quote]We conceded a dubious penalty, but for the second we lapsed back into stupid mistakes. Which, in my opinion, bears out the management''s decision to keep playing things slightly cautious, for the minute.Unfortunately pretty much everyone had an awful game yesterday, Redmond included, but thats not something you can legislate for.Fans (and this isn''t aimed primarily at you) really need to be getting over this "we are better than everyone else, we should just attack" attitude. Mainly because it is fairly obviously not the case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites