Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 1, 2016 Have I missed something or have they already been released? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FenwayFrank 2,716 Posted August 1, 2016 Nobody has got a squad number as none of them are good enough and the club couldn''t afford them anyway as the wallets empty Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diane 500 Posted August 1, 2016 Alex,I overheard a lady in the club shop on Sat tell someone who wanted a number on their shirt that they would be released early this week, so shouldn''t be long to wait Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 1, 2016 So that''s the reason we''re holding up the arrival of McCormack, Frank - it''s that fine balance between giving Fulham the straight up £15mil and deciding which squad member will be treated to printed shirts 😉Cheers Diane, appreciate the info 👍 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 1, 2016 Looks like the squad numbers are up on the official site, with just a few more to be announced.http://mobile.canaries.co.uk/team/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hoola Han Solo 448 Posted August 1, 2016 They''re last season''s numbers, Alex. We''ve got two number 25s if you look carefully. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 1, 2016 Well spotted Hoola Han Solo - though what made me think it''s partially correct is that there''s no RvW and they''ve included the likes of Canos and Maddison (though admittedly they''ve not been given numbers yet). It''s certainly been recently updated though, that''s for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nat_canaries 0 Posted August 1, 2016 If the preseason numbers are anything to go but it looks like there could be a few changes:Olsson 3, Klose 4, Bennett 15, Dorrans 16, Pinto 18, Vadis 23, Jacob 25, Josh 26, Maddison 28, Toffolo 31, Canos had 9 but I can''t see that being his final number so who knows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 5, 2016 So, with the Championship starting today(!), I take it we''ve abandoned squad numbers this season then? 😉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 108 Posted August 5, 2016 You are right Alex, I haven''t seen a thing on it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 5, 2016 Bit bizarre isn''t it mate?! Don''t remember it being left so late before? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 108 Posted August 5, 2016 Looks like most will have their old numbers, and there will be a few gaps, but I thought they had to be registered with the football league before the season starts ? and new signings pick up whatever is left during the remainder of the window.... obviously works differently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lake district canary 4,824 Posted August 5, 2016 Funny old thing, squad numbers, creates an impression of an order of worth of the players. To prevent the impression of a heirachy at the the club, squad numbers ought to be done alphabetically, then there is no notion that one player is better than another. ie - take the number 1 and whichever goalie you give it to, it is going to create the impression he has more about him than the goalie who has the squad number 2. Simply removing the impression of elite members of the squad is bound to have a good effect on the squad as a whole. Andrue number one, Whittaker number 25. No problem, no favouritism, no heirachy, just a squad of 25 players, all vying for the first team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 5, 2016 I understand where you''re coming from LDC but numbers such as 9, 10, 11 etc go hand in hand with certain positions, have done for many years, and for that reason I don''t think it''ll ever change though it''s a nice idea 👍 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hoola Han Solo 448 Posted August 5, 2016 LDC, have you been at the drugs again? Christ almighty, what was that post? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 5, 2016 That''s what I thought too, G - that''s why I''m a little puzzled with a day to go till kick off nothing''s been mentioned? But... I''m wondering if with Brady and Olsson likely to leave, and a centre forward coming in etc, that this week was perhaps expecting to see more movement then there was, and they''ve just got a little caught out finalising the squad numbering - I can sort of see why it''s hard to allocate Olsson''s and Brady''s numbers etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
STAN 30 Posted August 5, 2016 Delias probably forgot, clubs in crisis. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,358 Posted August 5, 2016 There was an interesting articles on the BBC about squad numbers I saw yesterday, detailing a team who once gave their squad numbers on an alphabetical basis. Bet that was a good one for the OCD sufferers! Based on logic from previous years and that it''s unlikely existing players would switch numbers now (due to marketing and what not) I imagine it''ll look something like this;1 Ruddy2 Whitaker34 5 Martin6 Bassong7 Naismith8 Howson910 Jerome1112 Brady13 McGovern14 Hoolahan15 16 Jarvis17 Klose18 Dorrans19 Lafferty20 Andreu21 Mulumbu22 23 Olsson24 Bennett25 Pinto26 Turner27 Tettey28 VadisSo we need to allocate numbers to;JonesGodfreyMaddisonMcGrandlesPritchardCanosMorrisand both Murphy''s Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cornish sam 1,039 Posted August 5, 2016 Yeah, it was Argentina in the 1982 world cup, so Ossie Ardiles was number 1 for example... That was for every player other than Maradona who had to have the number 10 shirt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Moss 2,167 Posted August 5, 2016 You''d think with Klose being first choice central defender, he''d now get 3 or 4 now? Or is he a ''superstitious'' footballer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Klose 0 Posted August 5, 2016 Timm Klose confirmed the other day he is 15 this season, as opposed to 17 last season. Also, all his tweets have #tk15 on them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mason 47 1,921 Posted August 5, 2016 Squad numbers are an odd little thing in football where an awful lot can be read into something so trivial, rightly or wrongly.The ''First XI'' will always have something read into it, as will any player that is higher than 25 and players that take unusual numbers for their position, like Morison when he first signed.I imagine it a PR move by the club- firstly, as we would no doubt see nobody on #9 and starting rabidly baying for a striker, and secondly, because it will potentially give another little kick in shirt sales when fans can get proper names and numbers.Having said all that, it''ll be announced today. Sod''s Law. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy_Bones 444 Posted August 5, 2016 If we were to allocate the squad numbers in the ''correct'' way, we''d get something like this:1 Ruddy2 Pinto3 Olsson4 Bassong5 Klose6 Tettey7 Canos8 Howson910 Hoolahan11 Pritchard12 Martin13 McGovern14 Jarvis15 Bennett16 Thompson17 Jacob Murphy18 Naismith19 Whittaker20 Jerome21 Toffolo22 Maddison23 Dorrans24 Jones25 Mulumbu26 Josh Murphy27 Morris28 Lafferty29 McGrandles30 Andreu31 Turner32 GodfreyWith the gap at 9 for our new main striker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bethnal Yellow and Green 2,424 Posted August 5, 2016 I always felt defensive midfielders should have 4 and 6 should be a centre back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted August 5, 2016 Hoolahan has literally always been number 14 and you''ve got him as number 10 #goodjob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy_Bones 444 Posted August 5, 2016 [quote user="Buh"]Hoolahan has literally always been number 14 and you''ve got him as number 10 #goodjob[/quote]That''s because they''ve been listed in order of how the theoretically ''should'' be allocated, rather than how they have been.Something I clearly stated with the opening sentence... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crabbycanary3 994 Posted August 5, 2016 A lady in the Club Shop merchandise hut on Saturday, explained to a parent that the numbers hadn''t been released yet, to avoid a "Bradley Johnson situation" referring to last year when there were a few grumbles that he had been sold , late on, and kids (and adults!) had his name on their Number 4 shirt. By that logic, we won''t hear anything until 1st September. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crabbycanary3 994 Posted August 5, 2016 As if by magic!!http://www.canaries.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/norwich-city-squad-numbers-3227123.aspx Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Browno 37 Posted August 5, 2016 1 - John Ruddy 2 - Steven Whittaker 3 - Martin Olsson 4 - Graham Dorrans 5 - Russell Martin 6 - Sebastien Bassong 7 - Steven Naismith 8 - Jonny Howson 10 - Cameron Jerome 11 - Matt Jarvis 12 - Robbie Brady 13 - Paul Jones 14 - Wes Hoolahan 15 - Timm Klose 17 - Sergi Canos 18 - Youssouf Mulumbu 19 - Kyle Lafferty 20 - Tony Andreu 21 - Alex Pritchard 22 - Jacob Murphy 23 - Harry Toffolo 24 - Ryan Bennett 25 - Ivo Pinto 26 - Michael Turner 27 - Alex Tettey 28 - James Maddison 30 - Carlton Morris 31 - Josh Murphy 32 - Vadis Odjidja Ofoe 33 - Michael McGovern 34 - Louis Thompson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crabbycanary3 994 Posted August 5, 2016 1 - John Ruddy 2 - Steven Whittaker 3 - Martin Olsson 4 - Graham Dorrans 5 - Russell Martin 6 - Sebastien Bassong 7 - Steven Naismith 8 - Jonny Howson 10 - Cameron Jerome 11 - Matt Jarvis 12 - Robbie Brady 13 - Paul Jones 14 - Wes Hoolahan 15 - Timm Klose 17 - Sergi Canos 18 - Youssouf Mulumbu 19 - Kyle Lafferty 20 - Tony Andreu 21 - Alex Pritchard 22 - Jacob Murphy 23 - Harry Toffolo 24 - Ryan Bennett 25 - Ivo Pinto 26 - Michael Turner 27 - Alex Tettey 28 - James Maddison 30 - Carlton Morris 31 - Josh Murphy 32 - Vadis Odjidja Ofoe 33 - Michael McGovern 34 - Louis Thompson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites