norfolkngood 1,174 Posted July 31, 2016 not really good for his confidence was it he is only young is not his fault the man playing at RB is ****i think this could have been dealt with better than taking off a young player after 19 mins i know it was a friendly but still embarrassing the boy is not good management i was hoping for a good season from him after his spell at Coventry hope his confidence is not shattered Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katie Borkins 1 Posted July 31, 2016 He wasn''t doing his defensive duties, fair enough he was taken off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,784 Posted July 31, 2016 I suppose that if he had already been told to wake up on the defensive side, then fair enough, we were being slaughtered on that side. I only saw it on youtube so cant comment as to whether or not he had been warned, but he should have been before being subbed. Then AN should have a word in his ''shell like ear'' and explain exactly what had occurred, how JM deals with it is another matter. The Club cannot pander to players egos, not saying JM is a problem, just that he was one yesterday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeiranShikari_2 0 Posted July 31, 2016 Felt tactical to me, not subbed off because of his performance alone. Nobody was good in the time before he went off.Nice stick though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chemical Bro 0 Posted July 31, 2016 AN said it was purely tactical, something along the lines of wanting to narrow the midfield o thimk he said. A tactical change in a pre season game, jacob just needs to accept it and crack on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ReadingCanary 0 Posted July 31, 2016 AN said he told Jacob not to take it personally. Was purely tactical. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted July 31, 2016 Not a problem, good character building stuff.AN explained to him it was tactical, I hope he ia as brave with is tactical changes when it matters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted July 31, 2016 It''s a pity that we have such shite right back that we need to take off a major attacking weapon, maybe Whitts should have gone off instead?Still have high hopes AN has the balls to go with attacking options this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeiranShikari_2 0 Posted July 31, 2016 On the bright side Whitts has almost certainly played himself out of the Blackburn game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mason 47 1,924 Posted July 31, 2016 From what I read it sounded tactical- if we were in a league match, and we were 2-0 down after 12 minutes owing to the right side being far too open, would we want to preserve young Jacob''s feelings?Not a chance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Angry 2,017 Posted July 31, 2016 I would have thought that Pinto was pretty much nailed on for a start this season, much improved in the last few games last season and Whitts nowhere to be seen at the end of last season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 335 Posted July 31, 2016 It was tactical, but as result of Jacob not being quite defensively aware enough. it''s a learning point. He was slow to react to their left back and needs to improve his defence game,. Plenty of time to learn and should on that I his development games this season (assuming he doesn''t head out on loan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Salopian 1 Posted July 31, 2016 He was replaced, but at half time Whittaker was replaced. This may suggest that the latter was more responsible for the defensive weakness. Certainly with the pace of Pinto replacing the slowness of Whittaker no further goals came down that wing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted July 31, 2016 I was suprised by Pintos pace, he''s pretty quick, with him and Olsson we must have the quickest two wing backs in this league! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
havemyhowsonit 0 Posted July 31, 2016 Think of it as this. Whittaker should be embarrassed. Neil had to change it up after 19 mins to cover Whittaker as the game plan was to get Jacob attacking. To only then get subbed after 45 mins himself. Whittaker should not ever play for us again to be honest. Let''s hope Martin gets back ASAP to cover pinto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fig Roll 0 Posted July 31, 2016 [quote user="have my howson it"]Think of it as this. Whittaker should be embarrassed. Neil had to change it up after 19 mins to cover Whittaker as the game plan was to get Jacob attacking. To only then get subbed after 45 mins himself. Whittaker should not ever play for us again to be honest. Let''s hope Martin gets back ASAP to cover pinto[/quote]This! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted July 31, 2016 [quote user="Indy"]I was suprised by Pintos pace, he''s pretty quick, with him and Olsson we must have the quickest two wing backs in this league![/quote]Didn''t you watch any games last season Indy? Pinto was pretty quick then but got out of position too much. He improved and learned quickly and I expect him to be a very popular player this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted July 31, 2016 No I knew he was pacy but yesterday, I was suprised just how fast.I love the idea that if needed we could go three at the back, push on these two as wing backs, negate having two holding midfielders and give Wes & Maddison freedom in midfield, not needing wingers! Just an option to go to, nice to have! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted July 31, 2016 Hungry? Sleepy?Do we win a prize if we guess right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJP 79 Posted July 31, 2016 Everyone blamed Whittaker but then they took Murphy off and the goals stopped. But it was probably still Whittaker''s fault they scored their third. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldRobert 38 Posted July 31, 2016 [quote user="Katie Borkins"]He wasn''t doing his defensive duties, fair enough he was taken off. [/quote]^This Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grant Holts Moustache 113 Posted July 31, 2016 I followed Jacobs progress very closely at Coventry last season and the general consensus in the second half of the season was that he didn''t get as many starts because of a lack of defensive awareness. I only saw a little of the game yesterday and he did seem to struggle with this side of the game. He clearly has some learning to do yet and hopefully a season at the club gives him a chance to develop this side of the game as he is very talented when going forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chuggs 0 Posted July 31, 2016 Murphys may have been at the club a while, however I want to see my team playing the best players we have. If we want out of this division this season then anyone coming in to the team has to help improve it. In my honest opinion I am not sure either murphys are up to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites