cornish sam

Whereas in the q&a paddy and Connor seemed to say that lampard was not in contention and the club were happy to have the media friendly names out there to avoid them actually outing who we are talking to with very strong hints that it was indeed Knutsen. At the end of the day though, all this speculation makes not a kit of difference to the actual outcome.

This guy in Tw@ted claims to be...

I know everyone's favourite itk has now opined, but, if it isn't Knutson what about Fonseca? I've seen little mention of him in these pages and seems to be very keen to come to the pl. I'm no expert on his preferred style but his CV is pretty good ..

His family is still in Germany so I would imagine he'll try to get something there. Now he has the reputation he has it shouldn't be too hard for him to get a decent job there even of he has to bide his time...

I cheated and I have to say I'm astonished...

Huddersfield for highest perhaps?

I think the problem is he has his style, he saw his style didn't work in the prem last time so he has tried to find a new style that will work and he's not quite found it yet. Against Leeds I would like to see him go back to what he knows and can do well, we're almost getting to the point where we have to go **** or bust, if we're losing we may as well lose in style....

Is the ability to name them though in large part to squads being much smaller, changing a lot less over time through transfers and far fewer substitutes and substitutions?

It's a misaligned laptop, or a cushion that needs plugging in for some reason...

The same Bournemouth owner who cares so little about the club that he was looking to sell it in the summer when they failed to get promoted?

It's funny that, because we didn't change our style or setup last time and signed a similar number of players yet people were saying that we should be changing to a less attacking formation and have signed more...

You lucky fella

It is farcical, and they still may be getting a points penalty for that this season as well, but, I wouldn't feel too sorry for Mr Rooney, he's been getting his 90k per week throughout this ...

Better ask David...

You do know where you are right?

Do we get parachute plastics? Giving us time to shed some of our excess plastics if we get relegated

I joined whilst it was still proactively moderating posts so posted about twice in my first 5 years as it fely impossible to have a conversation. But no matter how bad this gets, there's no way I would resort to 'social' media...

With my suggestion of £12m I did caveat that with a from memory, which was obviously flawed, so ignore that (could it have been £12m including the loans they have had back?). One thing I did mean to ask though, is didn't the turner's have shares whilst they were here? If so what happened to those? Not that it actually matters any...

Is that actually a supercomputer or just ordering teams by their odds?

I think it was actually maldini who said that, tho it's easy to confucius the two.... I had that coat a moment ago...

To be fair to Dixon and sourness, he did struggle with the pace of the game for the first 20 minutes, I thought he would be shagged out by half time, but he really grew into it and was a full on dynamo 2nd half... I suspect the issue is as much still getting used to the farkes tactical intricacies as the pace of the game

@OTBC06with the telegraph if you do the cookie selection then refresh the page you can actually stop it once the article is loaded but before the paywall has. It can take a couple of tries but definitely works on Chrome on my phone ..

Also got man of the match on the beeb report.

Tim Howard looks like one of those faces with magnet/iron filing toys....

You are correct PC, that was (I thought) the total they had put into Norwich of their own money. The inital share purcahse was for a relatively low amount (£300k is the number that jumps to mind but I may have made that up and remembered it as fact).