Jump to content

bloodwagon

Members
  • Content Count

    1,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bloodwagon

  1. I find it very funny all the binners come out saying its a rotten deal to have Adams and now Holt at the club.Thats without a ball being kicked lmao.Think they should go back to there own boards, and have a go at there manager and board, and leave us alone.How do I know this ? look at how many new posters are on here since we went down. You are not going to tell me they all City fansJust because we went down ? no.I think myself its a good deal as Adams needs someone good to back him up and Holt has been doing well in the Scottish leagues.As said Holt always gave 110% for us, and cant seeing him doing less as ass manager. Good on him if he comes and us as we will benefit. 
  2. [quote user="The Butler"]So the people who slated CH and his style of football (if you can call it that), continue to slate 1 striker for not scoring. Incredible if you stop and think. Holt left because he couldn''t stand it.....Hooper not scoring...RVW not scoring...none of the strikers managing to get many goals. In fact our lowest goals for I think ever. Yet it''s all RVW''s fault! Try looking at the system. Slow if not no buildup. Our "favourite Snodgrass" holding up every (using the term losely) attack and allowing defenders to get back into position. Plus shaking what confidence he had by snatching the ball away for that penalty. The hype on his back from day one without letting him settle in. Being asked to play in a role not suited to his style (as was Hooper) IF he now wants to stay and Adams plays the style he is saying he will, fast attacking football, then RVW and Hooper will thrive and be the outstanding strikers in the Champs. I hope Snodgrass leaves which would stop the team being one dimensionable and perhaps become a TEAM again. Get off his back and give him support, don''t take your disappointment in the failure of the last two years out on him.   [/quote]I agree 100% with you, shame more people cant see it. But then again most posters have green specs
  3. I think every one knows "Jumbo" is "Wiz" and thats a fact !!Cant see why "Wiz" didnt just keep here as "Wiz".Strange man (well i think hes a man or boy ). !!!
  4. [quote user="FenwayFrank"]Oh look, another new poster who had nothing to say while we were doing well [:P][/quote]Strange all them new posters come here when we go down but had nothing to say when we was doing so bad in the prem.Must be all binners taking the pee, but the boot will be on the other foot when we take  points off them, and they go into administration again   and screw the local companys in 1p5wich.
  5. [quote user="pyjamas"]LDC, it is perfectly acceptable for a fan to not renew his or her season ticket should he or she not agree with the direction in which the club is heading. It''s one of the few legitimate ways of protesting. We see your mentality at work at election time where voters bitch and moan about the state of affairs yet still vote for one of the three main parties. Time after time. Doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results is THE definition of madness. The OP has just found his sanity.[/quote]But dont the OP support 1p5wich ? If he dont he might as well ;)
  6. [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]People seem to think Leeds are. I think they''re still buggered. We''ll see who''s right[/quote]Leeds ? yeah right hahaha  six points for us, thanks1p5wich ? never lmao another six points for us thanks
  7. [quote user="City1st"]It does seem to have calmed down after last''s night''s hysteria - it was like the chimps compound at the zoo during a thunderstorm, with dozens of inane voices shrieking and chattering madly. I presume the schools are still open and they are there at the moment.I doubt there is any genuine supporter who is going to return their season ticket. If any ''fan'' does then it opens up an opportunity for the poor little mites and ''orphans'' who have cruelly been deprived of their chance to watch City because of the lack of spare tickets.And what of those over excited squeaks. Adams has only been a caretaker manager and doesn''t have the experience they cried, conveniently ignoring that was just how MacKay and Lennon started their managerial careers - albeit without the experience that Adams has had working as a coach within the club.They further whinge that Delia lied to them in January about no other candidates. Of course their were other candidates. You only have to watch major games on the telly to see them all sat their. Failed managers, not good enough for other clubs but good enough for City.it would seem.As said before, wiser heads will see this as just another new beginning. myself as looking at a photo of Lol Morgan pictured walking along the train platform. All of them since have been the new messiah. Two of whom were only ever seen as ''backroom staff'' before their appointment. Dave Stringer and Ken Brown, but each in the way gave us some of the finest moments in our history.So hush now children, let the grown ups speak. If you want to be part of all that, then do as was done before. Live up to those who stuck by the club when gates were 12,000, when football was not fashionable and being a supporter meant just that, being a supporter,Roll on August [/quote]Very good post and i agree with every word. Give the man a chance, its worked before and could work again. Trust me, N.A. is not a B.Gunn.I really cant see what all the outcry is about. Best man for the job, in my opinion
  8. Just one thing you lot must remember, the OWNERS are not you, its D.Smith and hubby, so they can do as they wish.YOU dont have a say in it, except not turn up at matches, ( That gives more people a chance to go instead ).I dont think McNasty had much say in the matter so go ahead do as you wish, but to single McNasty out is wrong.Just to add, GREAT on Adams, Good to see D.S. and hubby promoting from the ranks.
  9. [quote user="River End Canary"]You couldn''t make it up. Set your own deadline under no pressure. Don''t meet it and then come up with a load of crap excuses why you didn''t hit it. Another death rather than relegation moment from mchopeless. It is happening way way to often[/quote]You dont know whats going on, Could be contracts, could be holidays, could be anything, so until we find out who it is and why, no good shouting your mouth off and crying like a baby. bet you have missed a few deadlines in your life and didnt get upset about it.Power to the board for taking time to sort it out.
  10. [quote user="Wiz"][quote user="bloodwagon"][quote user="Wiz"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"] [quote user="morty"]So why didn''t you phone in then Wiz, put your money where your mouth is?[/quote]   I want Delia gone, do you really think I would have been allowed to tell her? [/quote]Lol, you really are so full of your own self importance.Do you really think she cares?[/quote]   No.............just as I won''t when she''s gone. [/quote]I really do think you should go and support another team Wiz, as you sure dont like Norwich city, try Leeds, you was on there long enough before you got banned. Or 1p5wich, i know you like them a lot[/quote]   1. I''ve never written on any Leeds site.   2. My first City game was in 1957, way before this motley lot infected the boardroom, so I can''t just switch to another club now, been a canary far too long to change my ways.   3. Don''t even mention bin men. [/quote]Well the truths out now, Wiz has ALWAYS been getting at Norwich city since 1957 !!!!!!Says alot about him dont it
  11. [quote user="Wiz"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"] [quote user="morty"]So why didn''t you phone in then Wiz, put your money where your mouth is?[/quote]   I want Delia gone, do you really think I would have been allowed to tell her? [/quote]Lol, you really are so full of your own self importance.Do you really think she cares?[/quote]   No.............just as I won''t when she''s gone. [/quote]I really do think you should go and support another team Wiz, as you sure dont like Norwich city, try Leeds, you was on there long enough before you got banned. Or 1p5wich, i know you like them a lot
  12. [quote user="City1st"]But if it is out of our hands then there is not much we can do about itThe real question is who we bring in to replace those that leave.We have a good record of bouncing back at the first go and with the right manager every thing else is in place [/quote]Course its in our hands, there under contract, so  there ours. End ofIf they dont want to play for us chuck them in the reserves and lets see how they do.
  13. I must agree Tim, Ok it was the Football league, but rules are rules. The rule must go with both leagues. Need to find another team who played in prem, who had points deduction, who played an ineligible player, and what outcome befell them
  14. [quote user="The Great Mass Debater"]I was thinking just the other day that a points deduction might be our salvation, I was thinking about Palace - but even if they got deducted 10 points it still wouldnt be enough![/quote] What do they do, i must have missed it, or been out of the country
  15. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27192069Didn`t Sunderland just get a fine ?If we go down can we sue Prem league ?
  16. [quote user="mrs miggins"]So Mrs, Are you changing your stance, are you now saying it was the wrong decision to get Adams in but the right one to get Hughton out? ---------------------------------------- I''m not sure Ray, I think, like most people, if Hughton was going to go, it should have been a long time a go, not with 5 games to go, because like one poster says, who is going to come in with 5 games to go. We decided to sack him before the biggest game of the season, i guess to get a bit of a buzz back, but you then have to appoint the right manager. From this result, the answer is that Adams was the wrong choice (not only shown by the result, but by the naive tactics). Again, its not clear if it was right or wrong to sack hughton at this time, but that it was wrong to appoint Adams.[/quote]How the bloody hell can you say that. Today I thought we played with heart, the result was not as bad as we would have got with C.H.As for tactics, its the best i seen them play for 2 years !!!! If only Wolfies shot had gone in.
  17. Good luck Mr Adams, you know you can do it !!!!
  18. [quote user="Wiz"]Not bitter lakey?[/quote]He dont sound it does he Wiz lmao
  19. [quote user="mrs miggins"]why the fuck have they replaced him with adams? adams for crying out load, they''re as deluded as the people on here. I''m not surprised they sacked him, many would say fair enough, good decision, but why adams. Why have we cheapened ourselves to this?[/quote]Dont get your knickers in a twist, its only for rest of season, as we were going down with C.H. we do now stand a chance of staying up were as before there was none
  20. [quote user="lake district canary"]That''s relegation nailed on.  Board has lost its nerve.   Hope you are all happy with that. [/quote]Me, Im very happy as we were certain to go down with him, now we stand a chance of staying up
  21. Sunderland on top now, West spam need a goal
  22. L.D.C.  I agree with you, wish people would just get off  Wolfies back. Just to let you know im an outer, wish C.H would have gone a long time ago, but you are right about Wolfie, but thats the only thing i agree with you on, sorry
  23. [quote user="lincoln canary"]Quite enjoyed reading that. Although classing wes brown as an england international is perhaps a little too much.[/quote]You have to remember it is a Sunderland paper.Still very funny, just think if we had lost. Would we have wrote something like that or, been quing up at Carrow road for C.H. head ?
×
×
  • Create New...