Jump to content

CanaryCuddles

Members
  • Content Count

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

20 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yes we should have got rid of him after the bizarre interviews and slagging off the fans started. I guess the point where he himself wanted to leave but Delia begged him to stay is where it really should have ended. Unfortunately the owners should have sold the club years ago they are too or of touch and became too dependant on others to run the thing. Too stubborn to sell it to someone who might take a shot at making a success of it i.e. sell out to the evil Premier league , they seem to be rather reluctantly ceding power now they have found someone of equally modest ambition and shallow pockets to buy in to the club
  2. Experienced PL strikers available to loan probably in limited supply though. I think the real issue is not already having a second striker who could step up to cover Sarge in the squad already (Barnes filling a different role and Idah not being ready).
  3. It's fine. Looks much sharper on digital media especially when reduced to smaller size. I mean, it's barely changed anyway, imagine if had it been a fresh design the meltdown would have been immense
  4. I think the exciting news was never anything to do with this. It was the Partnership with the Brazilian club and something else possibly even the signing of Hayden if that was sufficiently advanced it looked like a done deal. I doubt Webber would have been hinting about the investment being imminent if it was still being negotiated, isn't going to be a real investment in the club anyway and likely might come to nothing. I suspect that the pinkun did think that was what he was referring to which is why they rushed ahead to get the story out while it was still an exclusive. If the pinkun hadn't got wind of it and in the end the investment comes to nothing we would probably have never known about it and the club still telling us there is no interest from anyone tu buy Norwich.... Who knows
  5. Sounds fair enough. I think if he had said that he had a grand old time it was a great laugh being at Norwich, then it would be more annoying
  6. Not necessarily. I would however say that only a fool would invest in the club without proper corporate governance being put in place as a prerequisite. Also I assume they would require the right to appoint a representative to the board.
  7. I can't say exactly what fans were hoping for from this interview, but I would guess a lot were expecting Webber to take a major share of responsibility for the poor season instead of making a series of excuses and finger pointing. It's not about the 'fans' comment in isolation, it was yet more disasterous PR from him. We keep hearing that most sporting directors don't give this level of transparency, week maybe Webber should take note and stay out of the limelight. Not really sure what he thought was gained by this interview, certainly not appeasing the fan base
  8. We need an outsider who can bring a fresh perspective. Really hope Adams is just the holiday cover rather than being groomed for the job full time
  9. Good points although I don't think we need to abandon the loan system altogether. Really we should have loaned out Sorenson (and Idah?) to get game time when we were last in the championship. Then when Skipp departed we may already have had a replacement ready to go
  10. He says he tried to leave but Delia and Michael begged him to stay. The owners seem happy for him to give 90% and pursue his other interests instead of replacing him.
  11. No. As should have happened this season we need a proper defensive midfielder. That will help sort out defence.
×
×
  • Create New...