F.A.O LINKNR9 ...YOU R EITHER AN IDIOT OR LIAR AS SECTION 5 WAS ABOUT IN 70`S

[Barclaybred 0]

bro was arrested against spurs at home nov 4th 1978 ,for instigatin a riot,and was charged with section 5!!!

Plus he was also arrested against derby the same season and was again charged with causing damage(threw  crate threw clarence window were derby fans had ran),and....Section 5 causing an affray! there are 3 more in 70`s and 80`s against west ham in early 83, and most made the eastern evening news...so go to libery and read em yourself!...bro now in New zealand but he will send copies to me if you cant be       to read em at libery.....

[ncfcstar 342]

Your brother sounds like a true football fan :rollseyes:

[Badger 0]

What is section5?

[lappinitup 629]

Probably the five sections of this thread that appears to have got broken up!

[AndyJR 0]

I think this has to be a contender for ''strangest thread 2008''.

[Barclaybred 0]

Section 5 covered causing a riot, bro tried to meet spurs fan on pitch,but spurs fan went back into pen leavin bro to be arrested, and causing an affray, which againgst west ham he ran at a group of west ham fans (83),from a group of norwich,with his hands swinging,and a west ham fan fell to the floor,and an under cover police officer arrested bro....read june july/ eastern evening news in libery achives...ive got copies for 4 of his little troubles,and he has the away ones as well..

[ncfcstar 342]

Why are you proud of this?

[Icecream Snow 777]

[quote user="Badger"]What is section5?[/quote]I think this thread fits more with "sectioning", whereby under the Mental Health Act, people with mental disorders can be detained in hospitals for treatment.

[DDD In The Fine City 1]

[quote user="Barclaybred"]Section 5 covered causing a riot, bro tried to meet spurs fan on pitch,but spurs fan went back into pen leavin bro to be arrested, and causing an affray, which againgst west ham he ran at a group of west ham fans (83),from a group of norwich,with his hands swinging,and a west ham fan fell to the floor,and an under cover police officer arrested bro....read june july/ eastern evening news in libery achives...ive got copies for 4 of his little troubles,and he has the away ones as well..[/quote]

Your brother sounds like a prick!

[Barclaybred 0]

Hmmm good question, no i dont condone his behavior or his mates, but he put it down to youthfull exhubrance and he reckons it wasnt as evil as it got in the late 80`s when it became organised and nasty

[Show Me What You Gooot! 0]

I assume this is to do with another topic. Why not just post this in there?

Why do people keep starting a new topic to reply to something in another?

[Barclaybred 0]

Jus incase in didnt bother to go back to the thread...this way he knows he has been caught out for lying when he said section 5 wasnt around in 70`s, when it was!

[john 0]

bro was arrested against spurs

 he was also arrested against derby

and was again charged with causing damage(threw  crate threw clarence window were derby fans had ran),

there are 3 more in 70`s and 80`s against west ham in early 83,

 

!...bro now in New zealand

bloody good job by the sound of it. i bet you look up to him dont you.

whats he doing in nz now he is a big boy.. fighting sheep..

[Barclaybred 0]

 In time honoured tradition i will answer that with a  x

[lucky green trainers 0]

from what i can see, many posters responding to BB on this thread clearly believe they are ''above'' this bor and have been unfairly judgmental, abusive, insulting and patronising in my view...even maybe a tad hypocritical???

[Unhinged Canary 375]

I don''t think the other posters feel they are above BB, just above his dickhead of a brother.

[Beauseant 0]

Sorry,has the forum turned into some sort of self help therapy clinic while I was having tea? I really enjoyed the whole Iron John nature of the original post.Lets all strip naked,run into the woods and roar!

[LinkNR9 0]

[quote user="Barclaybred"]

bro was arrested against spurs at home nov 4th 1978 ,for instigatin a riot,and was charged with section 5!!!

Plus he was also arrested against derby the same season and was again charged with causing damage(threw  crate threw clarence window were derby fans had ran),and....Section 5 causing an affray! there are 3 more in 70`s and 80`s against west ham in early 83, and most made the eastern evening news...so go to libery and read em yourself!...bro now in New zealand but he will send copies to me if you cant be       to read em at libery.....

[/quote]

Dear Barclaybred,

I am neither an idiot nor a liar; I am a professional in matters relating to the law. No ''Section 5'' public order offence existed before 1986, because offences such as affray were COMMON LAW offences, not statutory offences. Here is an extract from the statute that explains it - 

Public Order Act 1986

1986 CHAPTER 64

''An Act to abolish the common law offences of riot, rout, unlawful assembly and affray and certain statutory offences relating to public order; to create new offences relating to public order; to control public processions and assemblies; to control the stirring up of racial hatred; to provide for the exclusion of certain offenders from sporting events; to create a new offence relating to the contamination of or interference with goods; to confer power to direct certain trespassers to leave land'' et al. Affray became a statutory offence with the introduction of this Act (Section 3); Section 9 abolished the previous common law offences. I suggest that you go to the "libery" to look it up for yourself.

 

 

 

[lucky green trainers 0]

[quote user="Beauseant"]Sorry,has the forum turned into some sort of self help therapy clinic while I was having tea? I really enjoyed the whole Iron John nature of the original post.Lets all strip naked,run into the woods and roar![/quote]don''t forget to hug the trees lol!!!  peace can be found in such pursuits?<>

[lucky green trainers 0]

[quote user="Clipped Canary"]I don''t think the other posters feel they are above BB, just above his dickhead of a brother.[/quote]apologies if i''ve read it wrong people.,/

[Syteanric 1]

[quote user="Barclaybred"]

bro was arrested against spurs at home nov 4th 1978 ,for instigatin a riot,and was charged with section 5!!!

Plus he was also arrested against derby the same season and was again charged with causing damage(threw  crate threw clarence window were derby fans had ran),and....Section 5 causing an affray! there are 3 more in 70`s and 80`s against west ham in early 83, and most made the eastern evening news...so go to libery and read em yourself!...bro now in New zealand but he will send copies to me if you cant be       to read em at libery.....

[/quote]

does your brother have a sloped forhead, nuckles dragging on the floor and answers "ug" every time you ask him a question?

jas :)

[norfolkbroadslim 225]

If ever a thread epitomised the need for more regular moderation this is it!!!!

I didn''t like the old format where you waited an age for your post to appear, but how about a middle ground somewhere?  Perhaps with some of the more long term posters acting as moderators in some capacity or another, been mentioned several times before I know.

Like I say I didn''t like the old format of moderation but it was better than putting up with rubbish like this.

Pete please can you consider making moderation some kind of priority, otherwise I fear this board may end up going only one way, down the Wensum.

[Syteanric 1]

maybe not moderating eahc post slim.. but a "community team like they hacve on the playstation boards who can tidy the place up when needed.. they have 20 or soand the board is nearly always "watched" 24/7

jas :)

[pennywise 0]

1st wizard gets to edit what goes on here ?  what an excellent idea

[norfolkbroadslim 225]

[quote user="jas the barclay king"]

maybe not moderating eahc post slim.. but a "community team like they hacve on the playstation boards who can tidy the place up when needed.. they have 20 or soand the board is nearly always "watched" 24/7

jas :)

[/quote]

I agree Jas, I didn''t mean moderate each post. 

[norfolkbroadslim 225]

[quote user="ched seven"]1st wizard gets to edit what goes on here ?  what an excellent idea[/quote]

There would obviously have to be some parameters

[pennywise 0]

maybe web team pete could do a  "nostalgic look at hooliganism "thread   like the "hucks at san jose" thread, all misty eyed nostalgic  lookbacks at kicking the ---- out of people as they lay defenceless on the ground could be posted on that thread, and people who don`t like that sort of thing could give it a wide berth.

[macdougalls perm 0]

[quote user="ched seven"]maybe web team pete could do a  "nostalgic look at hooliganism "thread   like the "hucks at san jose" thread, all misty eyed nostalgic  lookbacks at kicking the ---- out of people as they lay defenceless on the ground could be posted on that thread, and people who don`t like that sort of thing could give it a wide berth.[/quote]

What a hilarious post! [:D]

[The Fish Seller 0]

From the other thread on the matter.There was no "Section 5 of the POA 1986" prior to 1986 because it was only brought into statute in Nov 1986.The "Section 5" to which the OP refers would be a breach of "Section 5 of The Public Order Act 1936, "An Act to prohibit the wearing of uniforms in connection with political

objects and the maintenance by private persons of associations of

military or similar character; and to make further provision for the

preservation of public order on the occasion of public processions and

meetings and in public places".                                    {Section 5 of this Act was repealed by Public Order Act 1986 (c. 64, SIF 39:2), s. 40(3), Sch. 3}

Hope this clears the matter up.

[Badger 0]

[quote user="norfolkbroadslim"]

If ever a thread epitomised the need for more regular moderation this is it!!!!

I didn''t like the old format where you waited an age for your post to appear, but how about a middle ground somewhere?  Perhaps with some of the more long term posters acting as moderators in some capacity or another, been mentioned several times before I know.

Like I say I didn''t like the old format of moderation but it was better than putting up with rubbish like this.

Pete please can you consider making moderation some kind of priority, otherwise I fear this board may end up going only one way, down the Wensum.

[/quote]

Please NO! At least this way we get to hear what people say and think. In the old days, if you posted against certain "favourites" your post got removed. Be interesting to see if this is still here in the morning!