RugbyCanary 106 Posted July 17, 2023 Do you agree? I'm not so sure.....but worth a look. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satriales 993 Posted July 17, 2023 Looks a little bit like how the league table could end up. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stratton canary 162 Posted July 17, 2023 12 minutes ago, Satriales said: Looks a little bit like how the league table could end up. Yep I'd be happy with that! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 622 Posted July 17, 2023 (edited) Amazing how Southampton have apparently got a squad 4 times the value of ours but still had a wage bill £5 million lower than ours in 2021/22. All things considered we may be happy to lose the play off final v Leeds. Edited July 17, 2023 by essex canary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Holt 580 Posted July 17, 2023 Suspect Leicester, Leeds and Norwich's totals will head south before the window closes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 5,958 Posted July 17, 2023 25 minutes ago, Satriales said: Looks a little bit like how the league table could end up. Ipswich one place lower please! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greavsy 2,645 Posted July 17, 2023 11 minutes ago, essex canary said: Amazing how Southampton have apparently got a squad 4 times the value of ours but still had a wage bill £5 million lower than ours in 2021/22. Same stick different thread! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt. Pants 5,004 Posted July 17, 2023 Means nothing really, although I guess I'm heavily influenced by Luton Town and what they achieved. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 4,614 Posted July 17, 2023 25 minutes ago, essex canary said: Amazing how Southampton have apparently got a squad 4 times the value of ours but still had a wage bill £5 million lower than ours in 2021/22. Obviously you know why that is, but you still feel the need to attempt to criticise the club anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 4,614 Posted July 17, 2023 21 minutes ago, Captain Holt said: Suspect Leicester, Leeds and Norwich's totals will head south before the window closes. And Southampton's. We still have Aarons and Rashica in that total, and the relegated trio still have plenty of players between them that are likely to leave. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 622 Posted July 17, 2023 6 minutes ago, Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man said: Obviously you know why that is, but you still feel the need to attempt to criticise the club anyway. Must be the false news society when the facts become a criticism though those squad values may not be factual. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 4,614 Posted July 17, 2023 9 minutes ago, essex canary said: Must be the false news society when the facts become a criticism though those squad values may not be factual. But you're comparing the wage bills of two seasons ago to the transfer values of now, which is not an accurate comparison. I'm sure you're intelligent enough to realise that you're deliberately misrepresenting these figures to criticise the board, but it doesn't make your point valid. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 622 Posted July 17, 2023 18 minutes ago, Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man said: But you're comparing the wage bills of two seasons ago to the transfer values of now, which is not an accurate comparison. I'm sure you're intelligent enough to realise that you're deliberately misrepresenting these figures to criticise the board, but it doesn't make your point valid. More like 1 year ago in terms of published accounts. I doubt whether Southampton have acquired that value in the past 12 months. Either way their VFM is a complete shambles. Let's hope we get them rather than Leeds in the play off final especially with the man in charge who likes to put a plaque on a wall when his team scores after 50 successive passes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Google Bot 3,927 Posted July 17, 2023 Probably not far off, even if you took value from Aarons you could probably add the difference on to Gunn, particularly based on his performances for Scotland since being called up. Our top 10 valued players make up nearly €75m of that total:- I think that Sarge seems a little high perhaps(?), but then, based on what Webber said post season Omobamidele should be higher so that balances out, too. People like to **** on our squad but we've got some gems here, and many of them, are still young - Just consider Tzolis, Omo and Gibbs are all 21 or under, and collectively they're easily worth a combined value of £12m. (That list is euros). Probably is so many people are so down on the club and many players, and unable to differentiate between how we played and the results earnt pre and post injury crisis at the end of the season. Bottom line is that we should be competing around the top 6. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,781 Posted July 17, 2023 3 hours ago, Greavsy said: Same Tw@ different thread! Sorted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewNestCarrow 290 Posted July 17, 2023 Transfermarkt gets much of its data from boys-in-bedrooms. An example of how wildly wrong much of it is: Declan Rice: Transfermarkt value of £70m, Arsenal paid £105m + add-ons Viktor Gyökeres: Transfermarkt value of £11.2m, Coventry sold him for £17.2m Ben Godfrey: Transfermarkt value of £13.75m, Everton paid £23.6m Buendia: Transfermarkt value of £2.15m, Everton paid £1.3m + add-ons Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 5,958 Posted July 17, 2023 34 minutes ago, NewNestCarrow said: Buendia: Transfermarkt value of £2.15m, Everton paid £1.3m + add-ons Eh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,950 Posted July 17, 2023 Omo, £10m, Aarons £10m, Sara £20m; hmmm, only set out a reasonable potential value of 3 players which have been regularly quoted on here and already over their valuation. I've said the accounting carrying value on the balance sheet is actually reasonable, certainly at least £50m. Rashica should raise £6m. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewNestCarrow 290 Posted July 17, 2023 35 minutes ago, Nuff Said said: Eh? "We paid ...." cut n paste SNAFU Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 622 Posted July 18, 2023 14 hours ago, shefcanary said: Omo, £10m, Aarons £10m, Sara £20m; hmmm, only set out a reasonable potential value of 3 players which have been regularly quoted on here and already over their valuation. I've said the accounting carrying value on the balance sheet is actually reasonable, certainly at least £50m. Rashica should raise £6m. Surely the actual squad value should be higher than recorded on the Balance Sheet for 2 reasons: 1. Players developed by the Club have never been subject to an incoming transfer fee and therefore are not on the Balance Sheet but will be deemed to have a value. 2. Amortisation schedules on average are likely to be prudent in nature and players will retain value to a greater extent than implied by the schedules. This is one reason why Clubs must be worth more than on the declared Balance Sheet though Derby County apparently revalue players on their Balance Sheet according to their own estimates. The difference in Southampton's case still seems staggering. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
