Miss Bum Bum 0 Posted May 18, 2015 Was debating this yesterday are there any in their squad that are or could be premier league quality?That Teddy Bishop looks like he could develop into a half decent player and Mings with the right coaching and guidance could be useful. Thought the rest were donkeys to be honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lappinitup 629 Posted May 18, 2015 [quote user="Harry Kidd"]Was debating this yesterday are there any in their squad that are or could be premier league quality?[/quote]Were you mass debating while thinking of the scum Waveney? That''s what living in Lowestoft does for you. [:D] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ellis206 0 Posted May 18, 2015 Obviously not basing this on his games against us but Christophe Berra would be decent. Thats it for me though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BroadstairsR 2,273 Posted May 18, 2015 There is only one for me and that''s McGoldrick. When he came on on Saturday his quality made him stand out amongst the rest of quite an ordinary buch. The problem is that he seems injury prone and his overall attitude is suspect. I do, however, feel that he is desperate to taste PL football.Berra is a dirty, shirt-tugging player who seems to be having a slight renaissance in his career, but it may not last.Bishop is too slight and disappears frequently in games. He could make it to the top level but is some way away at the moment.I wouldn''t touch Mings in a million years. He has all the attributes except discipline. Fundamental for a defender. A disaster waiting to happen.Murphy is 33 and reaching the end.The rest are nonentities aka Mccarthy work-horses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horse Renoir 1 Posted May 18, 2015 I''d take Mings and Sears in a heartbeat. McGoldrick is too injury prone and Bishop could go either way, I couldn''t see him getting past Howson for years. I''d love to be able to poach those two but I wouldn''t go near any of the rest of them, they perform as a team but individually they''re poor and would look shocking in a different team Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KeiranShikari_2 0 Posted May 18, 2015 None of their squad are Premier League quality but Bishop and Mings seem to have decent futures in the game. I''d like to see what Mings could do where tactics don''t dictate that he moves the ball forward a few yards before punting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 335 Posted May 18, 2015 The highlights regualrly mentioned (Mings, Sears & Murphy) had their limitations magnified these last two games and simply dont match up to our current levels. Very early days on Bishop but not that great from the little I have seen - I would prefer Oliver Norwood from reading everytime. McGoldrick is a possibility - before his injury a far better player than either murphy or sears - if he recovers then he is a possibility. Beyond that the ONLY player who would make my starting XI ahead of our own would be berra - an organised leader who reads the game well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,902 Posted May 18, 2015 Not a single one. Signings are meant to improve the squad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimDim 0 Posted May 18, 2015 [quote user="Ricky Spanish"]I''d take Mings and Sears in a heartbeat. [/quote]Mings ! ! !I wouldn''t have him as a ball boy. He has the positional sense of a six year old playing blind man''s bluff. A walking disaster area.[quote user="BroadstairsR"]I wouldn''t touch Mings in a million years. He has all the attributes except discipline. Fundamental for a defender. A disaster waiting to happen.[/quote]Take another look at the highlights His desperate and failed lunge atWhittaker which Whittaker skipped over and set up the move that led to the penalty. His dithering in the box for the 2nd where all he did was block his keeper''s line of vision. And the third where his involvement was to disinterestingly dance on the spot without making a challenge. Time and time again he wasted the ball, in both games. He seems to have one thought that if you can''t stop the opposition by foul methods then use foul methods again. His off the ball attack on Whittaker could well have seen him sent off were Whittaker to have made more of it. As it is he has the second worst disciplinary record this season for the binners. A clueless clod hopping idiot, who despite all the hype is still a clueless clod hopping idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,471 Posted May 18, 2015 Only Mings, just to pi55 them off even more!The rest not a chance, to be fair Mings could be very good, he''s got pace and also heart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana (All Grown Up) 0 Posted May 18, 2015 Kevin Bru, looked much better than anyone else in a blue shirt on Saturday! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baywing 0 Posted May 18, 2015 Possibly Berra could be ''handy'' if Ruddy did go ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kick it off 2,062 Posted May 18, 2015 None of them are good enough for us whichever division we are in. I wouldn''t mind poaching Mings, Sears and Berra though. Not to have them in the squad, they could train with the kids for all I care, just as long as it winds the scummers up ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ron obvious 1,711 Posted May 18, 2015 Mings?? The one who elbowed Whittaker in the face when nowhere near the ball?Judging by other incidents, I thought he looked a nasty piece of work before that as well. A real bona fide scummer. No thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted May 18, 2015 Without the super mick "master plan" (snigger) they all to a man looked dazed and confusedThought they were all pretty shyte Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horse Renoir 1 Posted May 18, 2015 Mings will be a good player even if he isn''t there yet and would be great competition for Olsson.I think Sears is a good player to be honest that''s struggling under McCarthy''s tactics, the opposite of Murphey a donkey that suits their game down to the ground. He''s also a different type of forward to what we have now who''s capable of something out of nothing.The question related to the SQUAD by the way which is why I said those two, they wouldn''t be regular starters by any means, I''m just saying I''d definitely take these two Share this post Link to post Share on other sites