Mr Jenkins

Very confident of a passionate Ciy display. A change of luck and converting a few of those chances we''ve been creating, 2-1 Norwich.

No problem, 2nd April is fine. Please ignore the rather rude pm I sent you 😉

Good luck Cosmic😄 Over three goals would be a reasonable bet for the City game!

I''ve run out of lucky pants now so it could be commando on Saturday.

Craigbrown "We own the club" Whose is this "we" Craig?

Maybe even the press have a better grip on reality than you. Weird 😳

Did Waveney fart?

the following post at 08/03/2016 6:57 AM: And IT HAS AN IP POSTCODE. THE SIGNS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE. Maybe all our dough has been cyphoned off into a Swiss bank account in the name of M Evans.

Too much port wine I suspect.

hogesar wrote the following post at 07/03/2016 9:19 PM: I really don''t see the problem. An adult should pay adult prices. The one thing I do agree with is it should work the other way - if you wanted to downgrade to u21 from adult you should get the difference refunded. Does anyone know I''d this is the case or not? I have used adult tickets for youngsters in the past and never even thought to ask. In the spirit of fair play it should cut both ways, I agree, but are we not getting a bit petty here and wouldn''t the administration of all this ticker swapping be a nightmare to manage and enforce. I suspect the argument would be that if you have an adult ticket you won''t be using for an adult you should get the rebate from the club and they will then sell it on to another adult at full price. If you wish to keep it for a junior then you take the hit. I presume we all have terms and conditions on our information packs which we by implication we agree to when we renew, it''s probably in there somewhere.

Stan wrote the following post at 07/03/2016 7:43 PM: I''ll do my best Mr Jenkins. 👍

ICF Nail on head

Stan wrote the following post at 07/03/2016 6:36 PM: "17? fu*king 17?! we''ll be lucky to get 7 lol" Will you be cheering and encouraging the lads Stan, they need your support now don''t they?

I don''t think this is a recent policy. I''m sure something similar happened to me a long time ago and to be honest I felt cheesed off like you do. Just not sure this is a McNally thing so perhaps we shouldn''t be having a pop at him for this one.

Keith Scott wrote the following post at 07/03/2016 4:41 PM: One thing i do know is Palace haven''t won in 10 prem games. What''s the betting that run extends to 12 before ending against everybody''s favourite gift horse NCFC? If you''ve followed us for any amount of time you know it''s written in the stars. It happens. Every. Single. Time. What a miserable TO$$ER you really are Keith. Why don''t you get behind your team FFS 😜

I''ll be scanning the away section for a Cumbrian with a conductors batton in his hand

hogesar " 13 apps, 0 goals" Mmmm, what could the OP have meant then? 😀

How''s he doing this season?

There is still enough time for us to turn this around, we have had one good run and there is no reason what so ever why we can''t go on another one. I see no signs of the " manager has lost the dressing room" stuff. the real fans that go to games are still supporting the manager even though they don''t necessarily agree with every decision he makes. There is still a good spirit and anything is possible.

I look forward to adding to it😄

Morty Yes they did start with one up front, Paloshci, but with Alan Curtis back at the helm for a couple of games its a bit more difficult to predict what they were going to do, they had six changes from the team that beat Arsenal mid week, amazing really. Also amazing what Curtis taking over for a few games has done for them, saved their season by the looks of it. I know there would have been a risk of us being over run in midfield with a back five, my view though is we have found the small glimmer of light that something seems to be working, then it''s a bit daft to change it.

I can''t work out why we abandoned the 5 man defence yesterday. We have seen that this formation allows Pinto to get forward and still allows for some cover at the back. It also gives Redmond more unshackled freedom. The goal yesterday came from Pintos technique of "jogging back" after he has lost the ball, something which frankly there is no excuse for, but with a different formation there would have been more cover there. Why did Alex abandon a formation that the players were begining to look comfortable with and which suited them.

Strange thing is we had more than enough chances to get something out of that game. Yet again missed opportunities have cost us. Who do you want to blame for the chances that went begging today? The only answer is the players that missed them, Wes, Bamford, Redmond, etc etc. I don''t see how people can be pointing the finger at AN when this happens.

There will be a few surprises before the end, just enjoy the ride and see what happens

3-3