-
Content Count
9,443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Everything posted by Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man
-
Depends which way you look at it. Took Leicester into the Premier League, had four top ten finishes, won two trophies and took them into Europe, won three SPL titles and three Scottish cups in five years at Celtic despite Rangers being the dominant force when he took over, and then achieved three consecutive top-six finishes with Villa. He spent a lot of money there but they made a combined profit of over £30m on Milner, Young and Downing. Since then, he has failed everywhere and one of the major criticisms at Forest was that he wasn't prepared to adapt to modern football.
-
I suppose it depends what you mean by 'OK'. I'm disappointed that we didn't bring in a defensive midfielder and/or an attacking player, but I'm not exactly furious either. Personally, I would've liked to see us get a guaranteed fee for Cantwell (either a permanent deal or loan with obligation) and then use that money for a defensive midfielder, and then let go of Gilmour and bring in an attacker on loan from a Premier League club.
-
But again, why are you including Bournemouth's option on Cantwell in the 'money in', but not including our options on Kabak and Normann in the 'money out'? It's almost like you're attempting to twist the story in a way that suits you, which is worse than the Pink Un, who even you admitted are being 'factually correct'.
-
Indeed, it was becoming a bit of a circus. The difference between Cantwell and, say, Max Aarons and Ben Godfrey is that the latter pair are motivated by their football career, and being the best players they can possibly be. Cantwell seems to be motivated by fame and fortune, with football being the vehicle that got him there.
-
Is it possible to not be a Cantwell hater, yet still recognise this is for the best? Clearly a talented player, but unfortunately that isn't always enough, which is a shame as it's always nice to see local players in the side.
- 109 replies
-
- 13
-
Very little difference between Kane's today and Pukki's on Friday. In fact, Pukki's nudge was probably stronger. Its the lack of consistency that annoys people, but at the same time, both decisions were left with the on-field referee without VAR overturning anything which is what we want, where possible.
-
VAR
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man replied to The Great Mass Debater's topic in Main Discussion - Norwich City
Well, in some cases, VAR is needed. Lots of people nitpick about the things that VAR get wrong, but I saw this video the other day and seeing incidents like the ones with Vokes, Nani and Oxlade-Chamberlain make you realise why VAR was brought in. https://youtu.be/x5kajRbUMEI I genuinely don't understand the question. But like I said, there are some people who criticise everything VAR does, and those people would use the incident as an anti-VAR weapon for weeks. 'Man City were given a free kick, why weren't we?'