Jerzy Krukowski

[quote user="Robert N. LiM"][quote user="JTG"][quote user="Lewie - Holt our saviour"]Radio Norfolk"What do you think of the ref''s kit?""Gay"[/quote]Queue all the nancy boys to start complaining and probably a half time apology for the remark. [/quote]Yes, all those terrible homos ruining all the homophobic fun. Before you know it, we won''t even be allowed to be racist.[/quote]I know, day was when you could beat someone half to death for being different and the police would pat you on the back. PC gone mad. Next thing they''ll be banning a man from disciplining his wife....[:|]

Tory bell-end to boot........[:|]

Non christian catholics, catholic muslims. What are you two on about? Catholics are a subset of christians. You can''t be christian and a muslim! If you mean born catholic, then that is also ridiculous, it''s not genetic. Are you born a capitalist or a liberal democrat too.....

[quote user="Mello Yello"]My hair''s ''fine'' but I still look bald.....[/quote]Fine hair on a secret smile ey....[:|]

[quote user="Tumbleweed"]Thank goodness for some common sense chicken. I thought we played the ball around very nicely in the first half, looked more dangerous than they did but were ultimately undone physically and virtually pushed out of the game. I took a lot of heart from last night, even though we lost, compared to some shambles I''ve seen over the last few years with supposedly more experienced pros.[/quote]Absolutely right TW and Chicken. The doomsayers have had a field-day on this one. On many other days we would have won that game. MK barely had a shot on target til the second half and we failed to capitalise on 3 or 4 good first half chances. Que sera. Without the unlucky injuries, brute-force tactics from Ince and poor refereeing we''d have got something from that match. We''re certainly a bit lightweight in midfield and could do with more pace and width, but the defence was largely solid, Holt and Martin had decent games and no goals conceded from open play shows a degree of organisation that bodes well over the course of the season. Top 6.

[quote user="Marty"]Exams are fine, what is the point of trying to pretend that "failure" in life doesn''t exist? If this lesson is taught early it gives kids the chance to adapt and improve. Why teach these children in a way that doesn''t prepare them the big wide world? You can''t use red ink when marking papers nowadays since it is an aggresive colour and may cause upset, what utter bulls**t. We shouldn''t be encouraging all our children to be medicore, success and failure exist. Bring back school bullying, that sorts out the childhood heirachy, it may seem harsh at the time but you have to be cruel to be kind. Being over protective doesn''t help our children. Rant over. Now what was the thread about?[/quote]So.....You clearly did ok at school, were you a bully too? It''s comments like that wot cause unrest...............

[quote user="Sir Arthur Whittle"][quote user="Nuff Said"][quote user="SPat"][quote user="SirW"] [quote user="Facebook Sam"]As it is such a boring transfer window I thought we could discuss something fun. We all now know who is the longest in the shower, but who is the shortest?[/quote] This is the 2nd time you have started a thread concerning the size of peoples manhood....wahts the matter with you? Are you a poof or something??? [/quote]Manhood [:)] I thought only the New of the World used that term. [/quote]And I thought I must have become part of Life on Mars and be back in the seventies - poof?!? Does anyone still say poof?[/quote] Ok is he bent, a bandit, sausage jockey, whats his obsession with the size of peoples cocks? [/quote]Steady on Art, people might think you''ve moved on with the times if you use these new-fangled terms of homophobic abuse [:P]

[quote user="Dean"]At the risk of being shouted down by a vocal minority on this site who loathe anything that challenges the secular, athestic and permissive attidue of our day: I think you will find it is not footballers per se but all of society, just look at the Mps and bankers. Over the last half century Britain has turned her back on the church but without putting any moral framework or spiritual code in it''s place. When you stop teaching children Christian virtues such as nobility, integrity, honour and faith I think this is what you get. An whilst certain people can do all that without faith most cannot. hence civilisation has always thrived best with a recognized religion[/quote]I think you''ll find you''re the vocal minority. The rest of us have moved on past the fairy tales....

[quote user="SirW"][quote user="Facebook Sam"]As it is such a boring transfer window I thought we could discuss something fun. We all now know who is the longest in the shower, but who is the shortest?[/quote] This is the 2nd time you have started a thread concerning the size of peoples manhood....wahts the matter with you? Are you a poof or something??? [/quote]Manhood [:)] I thought only the New of the World used that term.

[quote user="1st Chief"][quote user="First Jedi"]Not half the player, say, Holt is...[/quote] Exactly, Holt is way better. Leon is an old, crippled t055er.[/quote]Exactly. He''s clearly showing as much loyalty to Cov as to us

On the same note, apparently according to Archant "It was that backing from the board throughout the summer and the subsequent turnaround after just one game that led to an avalanche of protests from fans who were angry at the treatment meted out to a genuine club hero." Really? A couple of snowflakes at Brentford and that was about it I thought...........[:|]

[quote user="chicken"]To be fair Keelan stopped playing in 1980 - I know he was a club legend but at 27 I cant claim to have seen him play. That was now 29 years ago so I would argue that most people 30 and under will have no recollection of him playing.[/quote]Ah the arrogance of youth..........[;)]I''d argue that Keelan and Woods were better than Gunny, but then I never saw Nethercott!

[quote user="Camuldonum"][quote user="TheGoogler"][quote user="cufcone"]It doesn''t matter if Lambert resigned the problem is the agreement said Norwich were not to offer Lambert employment untill compensation was agreed. Compensation was not agreed and Lambert was unveiled as your new manager so Norwich went against what was agreed between the clubs. I think a points deduction is going a bit far but if it is proved Norwich broke the rules then they are looking at having to pay alot in compensation and will probably be hit with a big fine aswell.[/quote]No, not true.We approached Colchester. Colchester said yes on condition we did not offer employment. Lambert returned to Colchester and tendered his resignation then was offered the job. Let''s get our facts straight before we wade into the situation.[/quote]   Not correct, I''m afraid.  You were given the "Permission to speak" by Rob Cowling subject to a condition, faxed to you and acknowledged by Norwich, that no contract was to be offered to Lambert without compensation being agreed between the two clubs first. Colchester''s case is that you ignored that condition and went ahead anyway.  Colchester believe that is in breach of FL Regulation 20 (iii). 20 Club / Employees Relationships20.1 No Club shall take any steps (either directly or indirectly through any third party, includingthe making of statements to the media) to induce or attempt to induce another Club’semployee to terminate his contract of employment with that other Club, whether or not suchtermination constitutes a breach of that contract.   20.2 No Club shall (either directly or indirectly through any third party) make contact with or enterinto negotiations relating to the employment of another Club’s employee. 20.3 The only exception to this Regulation is where the Club has obtained the prior writtenpermission of the Chairman (or in his absence, a director or the Secretary) of that otherClub. Any such permission must set out any conditions attaching to it.    [/quote]and in which section does it mention any points deduction for breaking the rules? Or indeed, an example of a club being deducted points for poaching? Colchester are understandably agrieved but they''re just posturing imo in an attempt to up the compensation.

[quote user="Houston Canary"]At least we agree on one thing, that D''OH-erty has been crap "at times".  The problem is, it is ALL OF THEM![/quote]How many games have you seen Doherty play in?

[quote user="Lineo"][quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]sounds like WLY for MOTM today,  such class.[/quote]I''m really going to regret this but..*Cringe*Who is WYL? :( I need to learn some how.[/quote]We LoveYou...Paul McVeigh. Can this be a sticky? [;)]

[quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]SOunds like Smith has had another storming game, but the defence are far from impressive again against another poor team 2-0 YAY!!! [/quote]"Norwich have defended very well as a team not just as a back 4"  Adams

[quote user="Nuff Said"]Leeds and Charlton both winning again. Too early to predict for sure, but looks like the playoffs is the best we can hope for.[/quote]Every team will go through a bad patch, Leeds n Charlton are no exception

[quote user="SirArthur."][quote user="cityangel"]p.s. He''s not in the squad today and not  even on the bench[/quote] Mook made an interesting point about Gunn going back on his word to sell off the top earners [ Doc and Hooly] and than suggested that Lambert was brought in to do this. Makes sense to me. [/quote]Surely the board/CEO could have gone over Gunn''s head and sold them anyway? If Gunn was that cheesed about it he could resign, thereby saving any compensation money too!

[quote user="city-till-i-die"][quote user="Mister Chops"][quote user="Beauseant"] As we approach the transfer deadline and the inevitable rumour mill on SSN, I thought those of you who don''t read the world''s greatest paper[:P] might enjoy this!   http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/29/transfer-window-dara-o-briain [/quote]In the spirit of reciprocity, Beau, I think you would enjoy this... [/quote]Dear oh dear....what has the world come to...some of the comments "It gives me scant gratification to be proved right in my warnings of a rising tide of filth". "Gorgon" Brown has betrayed Christian families everywhere".  FFS get a grip lol [/quote]Very good, sad that his wife had to sit down as she was so distressed. More likely embarrassed with her hubby.........

[quote user="Beauseant"]As we approach the transfer deadline and the inevitable rumour mill on SSN, I thought those of you who don''t read the world''s greatest paper[:P] might enjoy this!   http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/aug/29/transfer-window-dara-o-briain [/quote]Though he would have had to write fast, it''s remarkably similar to a sketch on the Kevin Bishop show last night......

[quote user="cityislife"]notts county as its still ncfc :D[/quote]me too, lots of luvvery money too [:D]

For a university debate (and another pornstar''s view that''s not quite so negative as the one posted earlier) go to http://www.ucd.ie/lnh/debates/1532porn.htmlFrankly there''s unpleasant people and expoitation in most, many if not all industries. The fact that porn is about sex is what makes it controversial. I don''t think sex is only ok if it''s in a commited relationship. All consensual sex is ok and all non-consensual sex is not ok. I''ve personally known a number of porn stars in my time, and they''ve all appeared and claimed to be having lots of fun, seemed more grounded than many and know exactly why they''re doing it. I''m sure there''s damaged and unhappy people involved, but don''t believe the right-wing religious hype that everyone is screwed up, abused etc etc.

[quote user="DCB"]In relation to the link between porn and rape, perhaps you might explain why most criminologists and psychologists take that seriously.  It is not too say everyone who uses porn will rape, rather that it can trigger such behaviour in the vulnerable and dangerous. Famously Ted Bundy admitted that his desire had stemmed from heavy use of porn, which then moved onto images of pain etc.. You may think that is ''just sex'' - I think it different. [/quote] Wild statements of pure supposition. Correlations are not causations. Show the evidence to back up your use of the term "most criminologists and psychologists" Even if true, the claims of Bundy about what "caused" his behaviour presumably can be treated with caution! I''d be more disappointed if my daughter became an estate agent than a porn star if that''s what she really wanted, was safe and happy doing it. 

[quote user="First Wizard"][quote user="WeAreYellows49"][quote user="First Wizard"][quote user="WeAreYellows49"]   It''s natural, it''s beautiful when in love, and there is northing wrong with porn, sex toys, sexy undewear or dirty magazines, it''s life, it happens, broaden your mind a little. [/quote] I''m quite shocked mate.............delighted for you hubby..........but quite shocked![;)] [/quote] lol why be shocked?  Everyone at one time or another has sex, why is it such a taboo subject I really don''t understand [;)] [/quote] I''m not hung up about sex mate (unless I''m very lucky!) and the thought of crutchless knickers always make me sweat a bit, but you appear to be all sweet and pure.............mind you.............I approve![Y][;)] [/quote]Christ, the thought the knickers with crutches makes me sweat more, tricky getting them on ....!

Ah, sounds like the wheels are starting to come off....shame. Where was this quoted from?