A Message from NCISA

[morty 0]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing..... and clearly an indication of what has gone wrong with NCFC in 2010.  Never mind the debt and ownership issues.... just as long as we have enough self important ''jobsworths'' to fill 12 irrelevant positions in a pointless organisation.Stunning.[/quote]

I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA.

If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]

I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.It is almost as bizarre as my imaginary PURIST group.... except that it was a theoretical bunch of tossers seeking self importance and superior status. This lot appear to be the real thing![/quote]So, whats worse, being an actual tosser, or just one in theory?[;)]

[. 0]

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing..... and clearly an indication of what has gone wrong with NCFC in 2010.  Never mind the debt and ownership issues.... just as long as we have enough self important ''jobsworths'' to fill 12 irrelevant positions in a pointless organisation.Stunning.[/quote]

I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA.

If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]

I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.It is almost as bizarre as my imaginary PURIST group.... except that it was a theoretical bunch of tossers seeking self importance and superior status. This lot appear to be the real thing![/quote]So, whats worse, being an actual tosser, or just one in theory?[;)][/quote]There is a vast difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it.......Otherwise you''d have your computer shoved firmly up your arse by now wouldn''t you?

[morty 0]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing..... and clearly an indication of what has gone wrong with NCFC in 2010.  Never mind the debt and ownership issues.... just as long as we have enough self important ''jobsworths'' to fill 12 irrelevant positions in a pointless organisation.Stunning.[/quote]

I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA.

If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]

I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.It is almost as bizarre as my imaginary PURIST group.... except that it was a theoretical bunch of tossers seeking self importance and superior status. This lot appear to be the real thing![/quote]So, whats worse, being an actual tosser, or just one in theory?[;)][/quote]There is a vast difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it.......Otherwise you''d have your computer shoved firmly up your arse by now wouldn''t you?[/quote]Oh right, knowing you''re just a tosser in theory clears things up, thank you.Why would I do that? Surely most human bungholes couldn''t manage a computer, probably not even a netbook.Really, you are a silly billy sometimes.[:)]

[lappinitup 629]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing[/quote] I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA. If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.[/quote]I have decided to form a new group called NINNCISANNIINCISAA which is short for Not In Neither NCISA Nor In NIINCISAA.

Fence sitters only need apply........

[. 0]

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing..... and clearly an indication of what has gone wrong with NCFC in 2010.  Never mind the debt and ownership issues.... just as long as we have enough self important ''jobsworths'' to fill 12 irrelevant positions in a pointless organisation.Stunning.[/quote]

I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA.

If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]

I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.It is almost as bizarre as my imaginary PURIST group.... except that it was a theoretical bunch of tossers seeking self importance and superior status. This lot appear to be the real thing![/quote]So, whats worse, being an actual tosser, or just one in theory?[;)][/quote]There is a vast difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it.......Otherwise you''d have your computer shoved firmly up your arse by now wouldn''t you?[/quote]Oh right, knowing you''re just a tosser in theory clears things up, thank you.Why would I do that? Surely most human bungholes couldn''t manage a computer, probably not even a netbook.Really, you are a silly billy sometimes.[:)][/quote]Wrong train of thought.......Most of us on here would be happy to oblige I''m sure....

[ca 1]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload,

[/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[morty 0]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing..... and clearly an indication of what has gone wrong with NCFC in 2010.  Never mind the debt and ownership issues.... just as long as we have enough self important ''jobsworths'' to fill 12 irrelevant positions in a pointless organisation.Stunning.[/quote]

I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA.

If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]

I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.It is almost as bizarre as my imaginary PURIST group.... except that it was a theoretical bunch of tossers seeking self importance and superior status. This lot appear to be the real thing![/quote]So, whats worse, being an actual tosser, or just one in theory?[;)][/quote]There is a vast difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it.......Otherwise you''d have your computer shoved firmly up your arse by now wouldn''t you?[/quote]Oh right, knowing you''re just a tosser in theory clears things up, thank you.Why would I do that? Surely most human bungholes couldn''t manage a computer, probably not even a netbook.Really, you are a silly billy sometimes.[:)][/quote]Wrong train of thought.......Most of us on here would be happy to oblige I''m sure....

[/quote]Cool, I''m working away just now, just let me know when is good for you and we''ll meet up, I''ll bring my computer.[:)]

[YankeeCanary 0]

Morty, I suggest before you meet that first you remove the RAM as a safety precaution.

[Kathy 733]

[quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload,

[/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[/quote]

No.

[Smudger 0]

[quote user="Kathy"][quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload, [/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[/quote]

No.

[/quote]haha whoops bitch fight! Wiz will be along to provide the mud bath so I am told... [:P]

[Beauseant 0]

[quote user="Smudger"][quote user="Kathy"][quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload,

[/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[/quote]

No.

[/quote]

haha whoops bitch fight! Wiz will be along to provide the mud bath so I am told... [:P]
[/quote]

 

Way too much enthusiasm Smudge! You really must cut down on the porn surfing....

[Smudger 0]

[quote user="Beauseant"][quote user="Smudger"][quote user="Kathy"][quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload, [/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[/quote]

No.

[/quote]haha whoops bitch fight! Wiz will be along to provide the mud bath so I am told... [:P][/quote]

 

Way too much enthusiasm Smudge! You really must cut down on the porn surfing....

[/quote]No need to rub it in Beau, the very thought of it makes me feel quite giddy! [+o(]

[TIL 1010 4,746]

[quote user="lappinitup"]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing[/quote] I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA. If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.[/quote]I have decided to form a new group called NINNCISANNIINCISAA which is short for Not In Neither NCISA Nor In NIINCISAA.

Fence sitters only need apply........

[/quote]

I would like to propose Nutty for the position of Chairman[:D][:P][;)][:)]

 

[BlyBlyBabes 0]

[quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="lappinitup"]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing[/quote] I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA. If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.[/quote]I have decided to form a new group called NINNCISANNIINCISAA which is short for Not In Neither NCISA Nor In NIINCISAA.

Fence sitters only need apply........

[/quote]

I would like to propose Nutty for the position of Chairman[:D][:P][;)][:)]

[/quote]

Not on I''m afraid.

Nutty only pretends to sit on the fence. It''s a strategic pose.

You see, his love affair with Worthy supercedes all else.

OTBC

 

[. 0]

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="shortfatb"][quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]Never has so much been said by so many about so few............What a load of waffle about nothing..... and clearly an indication of what has gone wrong with NCFC in 2010.  Never mind the debt and ownership issues.... just as long as we have enough self important ''jobsworths'' to fill 12 irrelevant positions in a pointless organisation.Stunning.[/quote]

I''m thinking of starting up a Not Interested In NCISA Association, NIINCISAA.

If I can get Cluck on board I only need 10 more people to be commmittee (for YC) members and then we can all have a ''mass debate'' for 17 pages amongst the 12 of us while everybody else watches with increasing levels of incredulity.[/quote]

I am very happy to join your NIINCISAA......  although we could not even begin to match the NCISA when it comes to mass debating.It is almost as bizarre as my imaginary PURIST group.... except that it was a theoretical bunch of tossers seeking self importance and superior status. This lot appear to be the real thing![/quote]So, whats worse, being an actual tosser, or just one in theory?[;)][/quote]There is a vast difference between thinking about doing something and actually doing it.......Otherwise you''d have your computer shoved firmly up your arse by now wouldn''t you?[/quote]Oh right, knowing you''re just a tosser in theory clears things up, thank you.Why would I do that? Surely most human bungholes couldn''t manage a computer, probably not even a netbook.Really, you are a silly billy sometimes.[:)][/quote]Wrong train of thought.......Most of us on here would be happy to oblige I''m sure....

[/quote]Cool, I''m working away just now, just let me know when is good for you and we''ll meet up, I''ll bring my computer.[:)][/quote]Just be content that a complete stranger is thinking about your anus.

[can u sit down please 0]

[quote user="Kathy"][quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload, [/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[/quote]

No.

[/quote]Bump [;)]CA, if Kathy gives me permission im sure we could sort something!

[TIL 1010 4,746]

[quote user="can u sit down please"][quote user="Kathy"][quote user="cityangel"]

[quote user="Mr. Chops"].  Appointing a committee member to the post of "Committee Member Responsible for City Angel Liaison" would also be a prudent move in terms of managing workload,

[/quote]

Can I vote for Gary or Danny T please [:D]

[/quote]

No.

[/quote]

Bump [;)]

CA, if Kathy gives me permission im sure we could sort something!
[/quote]

Too much information CUSDP.Have you actually seen how many miles those two have on the clock.You would get a far better performance from a newer model and probably it would be in better condition as well[;)]

[Kathy 733]

Many a good tune played on an old fiddle.

[TIL 1010 4,746]

[quote user="Kathy"]Many a good tune played on an old fiddle.[/quote]

Well i for one will take your word for that but i suppose the old uns give it their best as after all it might be their last go at it.[;)][:P]

[Alf Stewart 0]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[BlyBlyBabes 0]

[quote user="TIL 1010"]

[quote user="Kathy"]Many a good tune played on an old fiddle.[/quote]

Well i for one will take your word for that but i suppose the old uns give it their best as after all it might be their last go at it.[;)][:P]

[/quote]

Speaking for yourself as one now (at least) twice retired?[:$]

What''s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander![+o(]

[O]

OTBC

 

[The Butler 0]

[quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]

Then we would never have had Worthy as manager and look what a big hole in someones life that would have left[;)]

[As my login causes problems [ :o) ] 0]

Ahh no Worthy ....... then I would never have appreciated attacking football if I hadn''t witnessed how a fullback manages

[Smudger 0]

[quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]haha loving it, The Fat Controller!  [:D]

[Alf Stewart 0]

[quote user="The Butler"][quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]

Then we would never have had Worthy as manager and look what a big hole in someones life that would have left[;)]

[/quote]

Most certainly not. No one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football club than me and I can tell you it would have been Gary Megson ad infinitum.

 

[The Butler 0]

[quote user="Bob The Builder"][quote user="The Butler"][quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]

Then we would never have had Worthy as manager and look what a big hole in someones life that would have left[;)]

[/quote]

Most certainly not. No one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football club than me and I can tell you it would have been Gary Megson ad infinitum.

 

[/quote]

There are not that many tea cups in the WORLD

[nutty nigel 7,534]

[quote user="The Butler"][quote user="Bob The Builder"][quote user="The Butler"][quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]

Then we would never have had Worthy as manager and look what a big hole in someones life that would have left[;)]

[/quote]

Most certainly not. No one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football club than me and I can tell you it would have been Gary Megson ad infinitum.

 

[/quote]

There are not that many tea cups in the WORLD

[/quote]

[:D][Y]

 

[. 0]

[quote user="The Butler"][quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]

Then we would never have had Worthy as manager and look what a big hole in someones life that would have left[;)]

[/quote]We wouldn''t have had the indignation of being ruined by a tv cook either.....Worst days work this club ever did was to turn on the one man who made NCFC a genuinely respected force in the game.

[Alf Stewart 0]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"][quote user="The Butler"][quote user="Bob The Builder"]

I had ten fantastic years at the club and had the NCISA of the time had this leadership they would have been the "Chase In Group". Maybe then I would have had ten more because no one, no one, had more ambition for Norwich City Football Club than me.

 

 

[/quote]

Then we would never have had Worthy as manager and look what a big hole in someones life that would have left[;)]

[/quote]

We wouldn''t have had the indignation of being ruined by a tv cook either.....

Worst days work this club ever did was to turn on the one man who made NCFC a genuinely respected force in the game.
[/quote]

During my ten years in control, and I''m not boasting, just being factual - we finished third, fourth and fifth in the top flight, reached two FA Cup semi-finals and during one season stayed at the top of the first division longer than any other club. Rarely does a club as small as Norwich hold the top spot for so long.

Yes, we were "Little Norwich" back then too.....

But we were "Big Bob''s Little Norwich".

 

[PurpleCanary 5,561]

[quote user="Cluckbert Chase"]We wouldn''t have had the indignation of being ruined by a tv cook either.....Worst days work this club ever did was to turn on the one man who made NCFC a genuinely respected force in the game.[/quote]When exactly did the club turn on Arthur South? I must have missed that.