Lessingham Canary 108 Posted January 5, 2017 Wow here is a combination, for our Chairman, first strictly (national tour coming soon) now loose women, hope we get our transfer business done soon.http://the72.co.uk/71446/norwich-city-chairman-set-to-appear-on-loose-women/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tumbleweed 106 Posted January 5, 2017 Explains a lot about the priorities of the current management hierarchy. Talk about fiddling while Rome, well, smoulders............. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted January 5, 2017 Who are these loose women and how do you know them? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 108 Posted January 5, 2017 VW, I wouldn''t have a clue, never met a loose woman in my life ;-p Think Ed is looking for his next dance victim / partner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,358 Posted January 5, 2017 It is a bit worrying. McNally and Bowkett screamed business and did a very good job.Balls and Moxey? Hmm... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 First we had Moxey with his promotion,promotion,promotion and now we have Balls with his self promotion,self promotion,self promotion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="AJ"]It is a bit worrying. McNally and Bowkett screamed business and did a very good job.Balls and Moxey? Hmm...[/quote]It''s all a bit confusing now, didn''t McNally & Bowkett waste Lamberts golden legacy?Also, this screaming they did, was that the incident a Watford? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 What should he be doing?Not a loaded question but I have no idea what it is that everyone expects our non-exec Chairman to be doing at the moment. The board have (seemingly) decided to stick by the manager and any decisions regarding transfer negotiations in or out will be carried out by Moxey I presume? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
? 0 Posted January 5, 2017 Be fair! Ed''s role is a non paying chairman''s role, its not like we pay him £90k for a months work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"]What should he be doing?Not a loaded question but I have no idea what it is that everyone expects our non-exec Chairman to be doing at the moment. The board have (seemingly) decided to stick by the manager and any decisions regarding transfer negotiations in or out will be carried out by Moxey I presume?[/quote]Must be a pretty important role i would have thought as we have a vice chairman in Michael Foulger so are you suggesting Ed is surplus to requirements now the AGM is over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 No, not at all. Never mentioned the AGM? He''s a non-executive Chairman, what is it you want him to be doing at the moment?Simple enough question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 108 Posted January 5, 2017 Non exec chairman will be there purely to chair board meetings and act as a sounding board for advice, surely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Lessingham Canary"]Non exec chairman will be there purely to chair board meetings and act as a sounding board for advice, surely.[/quote]Yes i agree with what you say Lessingham but swanning around the country on the Strictly Tour and pop up on our TV screens every five minutes which he is doing hardly has him being available for that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 Didn''t realise you managed his diary Tilly. Perhaps you can post up all the board meetings he is missing in order to further his TV career; once we know that I''m sure we can all share your concern. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 108 Posted January 5, 2017 That''s the bit we don''t know, how often do the board speak between meetings? how much of the day to day stuff is left with Jez and he speaks with Delia and MJW weekly ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Apples 1,407 Posted January 5, 2017 Shock news - man who does one thing, does other things!!!Balls In (the Boardroom)!Balls Out (and about)!Apples Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Lessingham Canary"]That''s the bit we don''t know, how often do the board speak between meetings? how much of the day to day stuff is left with Jez and he speaks with Delia and MJW weekly ?[/quote][Y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 Quite. We don''t know. Which is why it''s absurd that people are using this as yet another thing to have a dig about. For all we know it could be having zero impact on his role at the club. I mean, video calling, conference calls, emails and even landline telephones are all open and available. Presumably you could have a board meeting with each member in a different country? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PurpleCanary 6,378 Posted January 5, 2017 I don''t remember this question being asked of Bowkett, who - while he was chairman of Norwich City - was also (not all at the same time) chairman of six or more other companies. With Bowkett the assumption was he could fit all that in, or perhaps posters were so ignorant they didn''t realise he had this other work and would have objected if they bothered to make themselves better informed... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 Bowkett wasn''t a Labour politician though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Bristol Nest 597 Posted January 5, 2017 Silly op. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"]Bowkett wasn''t a Labour politician though.[/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 It''s not fishing John, it''s true.Some people can''t see past his party political allegiance much in the same way as I suspect that people can''t see past Delia Smith being a woman. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"]Bowkett wasn''t a Labour politician though.[/quote]How do you know he was not a Labour voter though ? I mean i am fairly sure if Delia had not been open about her socialist views with her lifestyle and moderate wealth you would have her down as a conservative voter Duncan.So yes as you brought politics into it i think you were fishing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
? 0 Posted January 5, 2017 "Some people can''t see past his party political allegiance much in the same way as I suspect that people can''t see past Delia Smith being a woman."I can''t believe anybody in this day and age can be that misogynistic, after all Delia made her money by being in the kitchen, where every woman should be!😜 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted January 5, 2017 But she''s a cook, not a chef... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,424 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="Duncan Edwards"]Bowkett wasn''t a Labour politician though.[/quote]How do you know he was not a Labour voter though ? I mean i am fairly sure if Delia had not been open about her socialist views with her lifestyle and moderate wealth you would have her down as a conservative voter Duncan.So yes as you brought politics into it i think you were fishing.[/quote]How ridiculous.Tony Benn was born into wealth and would have Inherited a peerage had he not renounced the title and he is one of the truly great Labour politicians. It''s attitudes like this - she''s rich, she must be a Tory - that I''m talking about. So thanks for proving my point. 👍 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"][quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="Duncan Edwards"]Bowkett wasn''t a Labour politician though.[/quote]How do you know he was not a Labour voter though ? I mean i am fairly sure if Delia had not been open about her socialist views with her lifestyle and moderate wealth you would have her down as a conservative voter Duncan.So yes as you brought politics into it i think you were fishing.[/quote]How ridiculous.Tony Benn was born into wealth and would have Inherited a peerage had he not renounced the title and he is one of the truly great Labour politicians. It''s attitudes like this - she''s rich, she must be a Tory - that I''m talking about. So thanks for proving my point. 👍[/quote]No what is hilarious Duncan is you drawing a comparison between the chairmanship of Bowkett and Balls and using politics as the basis. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hoola Han Solo 448 Posted January 5, 2017 It''s true though. Many Norwich fans base their opinion on Balls'' political party. Completely absurd, NFN view of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 5,246 Posted January 5, 2017 [quote user="Hoola Han Solo"]It''s true though. Many Norwich fans base their opinion on Balls'' political party. Completely absurd, NFN view of course.[/quote]Very true HHS. I have my views on Ed Balls the Chairman and Ed Balls the politican. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites