CanaryOne

No it all probably depends on how much we get for Clingan , Hoolahan and the rebate money ,when has this club ever had a transfer kitty

Would you sign for Gunn ?

[quote user="city-till-i-die"]Dear Delia and Michael,......F O!!!!!! [:@][/quote] That post says it all , just FO both of you .

Dear oh dear oh dear , just how low can this club sink .

[quote user="Camuldonum"][quote user="PurpleCanary"]canary cherub, I cannot answer for the EDP''s use of English, but what that sentence means is that BOTH have stepped down from ALL their roles. If it meant SOME of their roles but not others that would have to be specified. [/quote] It is also made clear on the official site that Munby will step down as a director when there is a replacement. [/quote] It says when a replacement is sought , so are they seeking one yet or not .

Is there a bigger negative than Gunn , his appointment turned this club into a laughing stock and however many people they drag out to tell us he is the man we know he is not and we would be better off with a football manager in charge.

Yes it is absolutely pathetic , Delia wheels out one of her old cronies to big up the lost cause that is Bryan Gunn . Gunn has the right credentials and should have been given a 5 year contract , what complete rubbish Gunn has NO credentials and has proved he cannot manage a football team , 5 year contract 5 mins of this fool of a manager is 5 minutes to much .

[quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="GMF"] I''m puzzled by a number of comments on this thread. Are people are seriously suggesting that the SCG had a major role in the appointment of BG? Personally, I somehow doubt it. Are the SCG actively seeking to be the "fans representative" on the Board, as some have suggested? Again, I can''t find any evidence of this but I''m more than prepared to be enlightened. I''m also puzzled by the apparent slight directed towards one apparent SCG member, especially as this seems to be from certain prominent members of NCISA! I thought you were suppose to offer a broad church of views, but this only seems to be when it suits!   [/quote] The answers to your first two points are a resounding no.The third point you raise is obviously aimed at me and a certain Miss Q.I am all for the broad church of views policy but i am not prepared to accept snide remarks and comments about my Association as has been done and also to me personally via this messageboard and even Facebook.Ring me up or meet me is my policy but the individual you refer to has not even responded to e-mails that i have sent directly to them regarding the issue they so plainly have with NCISA and myself. [/quote] Having read some of her comments about you on messageboards its as clear as crystal she doesnt like you very much :-) Norwich City one big happy family .

[quote user="The Chirp"]Gunn has been appointed... GET OVER IT!!! This has really... REALLY been done to death on here! You can''t change what has happened, Roeder can say what he likes now... We all know he was dire. Our team had barely any signed players! Crazy! I totally mean this, I would rather go down to league 1, sort out the house and get back in to the Championship with our own players THAN have stayed up using a team full of Roeders loanees... [/quote] People can demonstrate their disapproval of Gunn as manager just the same as they did Worthy ,Grant and Roeder you dont just have to sit back and accept every crap deceision Smith makes .As for rebuilding and getting back to the Championship with our own players , dont expect anything like that to happen untill Smith is gone and Gunn replaced with somebody who knows what they are doing. At a rough guess i would say we will be in league one for the best part of 10 years.

Hayes would do well for us now because we are League 1 , he wont be good enough at Championship level.

[quote user="kdncfc"][quote user="Camuldonum"]Hmmmm....can''t say how you would have got on but three more come down with two years of parachute payments, three more next season, three more the season after that.  Drip, drip, drip..........................[/quote] The parachute payments didn''t seem to do us much good did they? So I presume it''s one rule for good old prudent NCFC and another rule for all the others. Parachute payments are only an advantage if you invest them in players as West Brom have done to enable them to stay one step ahead of most teams in the Chumpionship each time they''ve been relegated. [/quote] And where did our parachute payments go ? Jason Jarrett ,Peter Thorne ,Louis Jean , Andy Hughes etc etc , not much there for £14 million.

[quote user="pete_norw"]It just shows how much they care for the fans and the club, Not a bit interested in giveing back the pride to the many thousands of fans, they blame the big money men for our Demise, when the answer is in the mirrow in the office,[/quote] Correct , Smith and Jones are responsible for this clubs demise more so than money , plenty of clubs with less than us in the Championship .All we can hope is that they see sense and sod off before they take us any lower , after the appointment of Gunn that does not look on the cards though.

No they will not , and the hardest bit to take about Gunn getting the job was it came shortly after they had told us they had learnt from their mistakes and things were going to change. Gunn is probably the biggest mistake they have ever made , hopes of staying up died the day he was given the job and any hopes of promotion next season died the day they reappointed him.

[quote user="jas the barclay king"][quote user="Mister Chops"]Unlike Gunn, Shearer has other career options.  Back to the BBC, for example.Oh, and Shearer is also adored by the fans.  Unlike Gunn.[/quote] Shearer was adored by the fans as a player.. LIKE gunn.... jas :) [/quote] Newcastle fans also love him as a manager and wanted him in the job to start with , a lot Norwich fans did not want Gunn from day one and hardly anybody wanted him reappointed.

Just what i was thinking Wiz , didnt make a start for Col U last season and just 5 appearances as sub , hardly makes him well thought of in my eyes .

[quote user="Mister Chops"][quote user="Camuldonum"][quote user="Buckethead"][quote user="Mister Chops"]I understand that at a recent SCG meeting, each member was asked to say, on a "round the table" basis, whether they would be happy if Bryan Gunn was given the manager''s job on a full-time basis.　LQ, perhaps you could tell us what the yes/no vote breakdown was?[/quote]This is a great question and deserves an answer.[/quote] It would have been a "great question" possibly had it ever been asked.  But sadly, it wasn''t. Don''t let me stop you. [/quote]Cam, I''m not quite sure what you are trying to achieve but perhaps you could wind your neck in on this one.I know someone who sits on the SCG, and they were adamant the question was asked in a recent meeting.  Not May''s meeting, clearly, as this was cancelled (I have though seen the flurry of emails between participants asking whether an EGM should be called - they decided not).  I would like LQ to tell us which meeting it was raised in, and what the votes for and against Gunn''s appointment were.[/quote]  I believe in one of Lqs posts either on here or on the official site messageboard she stated she was genuinely surprised the Board had gone down the route of reappointing Bryan Gunn , which rather suggests if there was such a vote it had gone against Gunn.

[quote user="singing canary"]have a look down the team sheet very few are signed by gunn , roeder was a complete tool[/quote] In fact 10 of the 16 on duty at Charlton were good old Gunnys men , no wonder we had such a no show , if Roeders a tool Gunns a F---ing tool .

[quote user="singing canary"]considerimg it was most of roeders players who got us in this mess , i doubt it[/quote] Think you will find most of the side playing towards the end of the season were the clown Gunners choice .Gunn will never be as good a manager as Roeder because once City see sense and sack him his managerial career comes to an end because no other club would employ him .

[quote user]="missing in action?"]id like him to stay personally.sell hoolahan instead. [/quote I dont think you need worry to much about either they will both leave.

Gunn looks and sounds  like he is completely lost , has not got a clue and why on gods earth he feels he is the right man for the job i will never know , he has just got that taste of power and wont let go whether it harms the football club or not . At least Grant had the decency to walk away , Gunn it seems does not know what the word decency means.

[quote user="Hell yeah"]of course there could. we could get glenn roeder back[/quote] Glenn Roeder is 100 times the manager Gunn will ever be , Gunn will be back doing any little job the club can offer him by xmas .Worst manager ever .

[quote user="ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE"]I thought that NCISA where there to support the club not stir up as much trouble as possible.If transfer funds are not there next season not only will they be able to blame the board they will be able to blame the so called suppopters who have claimed there refunds.I do not agree with all the board have done but we need every penney we can get hold of to build a team for next season. I will not be claiming my refund in fact if i could afford to i would invest more in the club.  ON THE BALL TRUE SUPPORTERS ONLY WANTED[/quote] And its mugs like you that have taken this club to its lowest position for 50 years , club would be far better off without you .

Whatever money we get for Clingan will vanish just like all our transfer money always does.

Delia has already lost her millions she is never going to get them back now , thats if she hasnt already had them back with a few more on top . This club is going nowhere untill she is removed , i dont think we will go out of existence once shes gone thats just what the Delialites want you to believe.

What about Cureton i suppose he gets to stay as he is Gunnys buddy , pathetic.