Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 .....Grant Holt, so that those who actually understand football can enjoy a few weeks of peace while Lambertistas fawn over yesteryear Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YellowNets1901 0 Posted January 8, 2014 Too pathetic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 I mean, seriously though. With Holt back it would make a real difference toOh wait, he''s crap now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YellowNets1901 0 Posted January 8, 2014 Playtime finishes in 15 minutes, mate. Don''t be late back in class. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 Ah, the schoolboy put down, you are mindblowingly original. I must have missed your tenure as Pink Un Jester in Chief Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crabbycanary 2 Posted January 8, 2014 A little giggle was let off inside me CotW, when I read that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 By no means the best effort i''ve seen on this forum, but thanks for not being un phallus enorme like some people ahem...above Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted January 8, 2014 The premise of this thread is almost as bad as the OP''s cover of on the ball city Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 Nope, nowhere near. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rock The Boat 1,332 Posted January 8, 2014 I think the OP was using sarcasm as a tool of humour Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 8, 2014 Might have worked had they written it in English and not that well known language of gobbledygook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 How exactly is my OP written in ''gobbledygook''?Please, explain. Justify by some or indeed any means your strange claim. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city4eva 242 Posted January 8, 2014 [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]How exactly is my OP written in ''gobbledygook''?Please, explain. Justify by some or indeed any means your strange claim.[/quote]If you dont know, there is no hope Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lake district canary 4,826 Posted January 8, 2014 [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]How exactly is my OP written in ''gobbledygook''?Please, explain. Justify by some or indeed any means your strange claim.[/quote]Let me help [:)]Its simple. If you want someone to leave you ask them to resign. If you want them to come back you have to re-sign them.Your play on words - if that it was what it was meant to be - kind of failed.Unfortunately to most of us it was gobbledygook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted January 8, 2014 so was it a joke or not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Big Bad Wolf 0 Posted January 8, 2014 I agreed with every word up to and including the word "resign" - let''s just leave it there! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 How incredibly condescending and exactly what I have come to expect of this forum.You think because I opted not to hyphenate in ''resign'' that I was unaware of the connotations of both meanings?Had I put ''Hughton Needs To Re-Sign'' then it would have been equally guilty of the same crime.Hughton Needs To Resign implies as a standalone statement, whereas the former makes the continuation too obvious.I apologise for assuming you had more intelligence than needing to be spoon fed the pun.I''m not sure it''s me who needs to do the hoping. Best you all get back to incessantly whining about Houghton. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lake district canary 4,826 Posted January 8, 2014 [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]How incredibly condescending and exactly what I have come to expect of this forum. You think because I opted not to hyphenate in ''resign'' that I was unaware of the connotations of both meanings? Had I put ''Hughton Needs To Re-Sign'' then it would have been equally guilty of the same crime. Hughton Needs To Resign implies as a standalone statement, whereas the former makes the continuation too obvious.I apologise for assuming you had more intelligence than needing to be spoon fed the pun. I''m not sure it''s me who needs to do the hoping. Best you all get back to incessantly whining about Houghton.[/quote]I''m confused now. Did you mean "Hughton needs to resign", or "Hughton needs to re-sign Grant Holt?" Or did you mean both? Or neither? [:^)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
littleyellowbirdie 3,138 Posted January 8, 2014 [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]How incredibly condescending and exactly what I have come to expect of this forum.You think because I opted not to hyphenate in ''resign'' that I was unaware of the connotations of both meanings?Had I put ''Hughton Needs To Re-Sign'' then it would have been equally guilty of the same crime.Hughton Needs To Resign implies as a standalone statement, whereas the former makes the continuation too obvious.I apologise for assuming you had more intelligence than needing to be spoon fed the pun.I''m not sure it''s me who needs to do the hoping. Best you all get back to incessantly whining about Houghton.[/quote]I think it''s the sort of pun that works better spoken than written. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 And there''s the same disingenuous baiting as previously seen by the likes of yourself, Nexus_Canary and others. Shame, I actually agree with a lot of your NCFC opinions LDC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lake district canary 4,826 Posted January 8, 2014 [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]And there''s the same disingenuous baiting as previously seen by the likes of yourself, Nexus_Canary and others. Shame, I actually agree with a lot of your NCFC opinions LDC.[/quote]I''m sorry, its a quiet evening with not much going on - no transfer news, no scandal, no arguments - even City 1st is bored...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 I''ve heard we''re set to sign Callum McManaman in a straight swap for Snodgrass after he slept with Hughton''s wife following a bitter row.Allegedly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
havemyhowsonit 0 Posted January 8, 2014 Are you trying to build up the numbers on your posts COTW or do you really have that much time to explain your ballicks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 8, 2014 You have over 3.5 times more posts on here than me, and not once have I ever seen you post anything valuable or even vaguely worthwhile. At least I''ve contributed positively to discussions on other threads. Idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted January 9, 2014 Don''t be so tetchy,gobbledygook in the hands of a politician is an art form. Maybe you should consider a career change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nexus_Canary 1,206 Posted January 9, 2014 [quote user="Canary On The Wire"]And there''s the same disingenuous baiting as previously seen by the likes of yourself, Nexus_Canary and others. Shame, I actually agree with a lot of your NCFC opinions LDC.[/quote]Here fishy fishyMate, you been biting up and down this thread without me even logging in. I would respond to the tosh you posted in your OP but frankly it made about as much sense as a Welsh rapper. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nexus_Canary 1,206 Posted January 9, 2014 Ohhh now i get it... you meant to RE-sign or Sign... rather than RESIGN you mong Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canary On The Wire 0 Posted January 9, 2014 Your emergence on this thread (like an irrelevant and forgotten nemesis, e.g Ipswich Town) followed by a petty insult, constitutes a bite if you ask me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites