Peregrine Shorts 320 Posted March 29, 2023 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65085346 third in the sustainability ratings 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt. Pants 4,262 Posted March 29, 2023 Very well done City - keep it up and get that no.1 spot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satriales 669 Posted March 29, 2023 Not one current premier league side in there! I guess all of those 30 minute flights up and down the country add up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Feedthewolf 4,861 Posted March 29, 2023 4 minutes ago, Satriales said: Not one current premier league side in there! I guess all of those 30 minute flights up and down the country add up. Er... that's because these are EFL rankings, sir. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,554 Posted March 29, 2023 That can't be right according to what I read on here. Still, City going up and the scum are going down... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satriales 669 Posted March 29, 2023 15 minutes ago, Feedthewolf said: Er... that's because these are EFL rankings, sir. Haha, oops. Clearly too early for me, I'm off for a strong coffee. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,334 Posted March 29, 2023 1 hour ago, nutty nigel said: That can't be right according to what I read on here. Still, City going up and the scum are going down... Is that because failure is sustainable but success isnt Nuttyo? 😉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 497 Posted March 29, 2023 Strange then that our Annual Report states that CO2 tonnes emissions rose from 983.47 in 2020/21 to 1,353.71 in 2021/22. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,334 Posted March 29, 2023 Just now, essex canary said: Strange then that our Annual Report states that CO2 tonnes emissions rose from 983.47 in 2020/21 to 1,353.71 in 2021/22. Maybe it was less than a lot of others?...JEEZ YOU ARE SLOW. But we knew this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 497 Posted March 29, 2023 42 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said: Maybe it was less than a lot of others?...JEEZ YOU ARE SLOW. But we knew this. Yes. A very good and doubtless accurate point. I could have mistaken you for Cambridge or maybe Oxford. If the third best achieves a 37% rise we could all be doomed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,334 Posted March 29, 2023 23 minutes ago, essex canary said: Yes. A very good and doubtless accurate point. I could have mistaken you for Cambridge or maybe Oxford. If the third best achieves a 37% rise we could all be doomed. Believe it or not we are mortals....hence no ST in perpetuity. Stupid boy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GenerationA47 758 Posted March 29, 2023 26 minutes ago, essex canary said: Yes. A very good and doubtless accurate point. I could have mistaken you for Cambridge or maybe Oxford. If the third best achieves a 37% rise we could all be doomed. Pretty much everyone's emissions went up massively in that precise time period - individuals, organisations, countries. Just as they typically went down hugely between 2019/20 & 2020/21 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 497 Posted March 29, 2023 7 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said: Believe it or not we are mortals....hence no ST in perpetuity. Stupid boy. Could go the same way as the dinosaurs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,435 Posted March 29, 2023 1 hour ago, essex canary said: Strange then that our Annual Report states that CO2 tonnes emissions rose from 983.47 in 2020/21 to 1,353.71 in 2021/22. The emergence from the Covid lockdown perhaps? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 497 Posted March 29, 2023 Just now, shefcanary said: The emergence from the Covid lockdown perhaps? To be fair there is a footnote in the Annual Report to that effect. It may nevertheless have been informative to have made cross reference to the pre-pandemic position in order that the reader could have understood the general direction of travel assuming it is favourable. I bet Forest Greens Directors take less flights than ours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,334 Posted March 29, 2023 17 minutes ago, essex canary said: Could go the same way as the dinosaurs. You already have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,334 Posted March 29, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, essex canary said: To be fair there is a footnote in the Annual Report to that effect. It may nevertheless have been informative to have made cross reference to the pre-pandemic position in order that the reader could have understood the general direction of travel assuming it is favourable. I bet Forest Greens Directors take less flights than ours. Stupid is as stupid does. Do you not read things before you whinge? Tillo was right, you have become a laughing stock( and shares). Edited March 29, 2023 by wcorkcanary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crafty Canary 497 Posted March 29, 2023 Shame the team’s performances are ‘t sustainable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PockthorpePete 331 Posted March 29, 2023 8 hours ago, nutty nigel said: That can't be right according to what I read on here. Still, City going up and the scum are going down... Burning straw bales is not the most environmental behaviour. Though it does provide heat for their bored room. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KiwiScot 1,459 Posted March 30, 2023 On 29/03/2023 at 17:35, Crafty Canary said: Shame the team’s performances are ‘t sustainable. Sounds like an agreement with how Webber looks at things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 497 Posted March 31, 2023 To be fair I think our Board should be put of charge of global warming. Then it will come to a halt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KiwiScot 1,459 Posted March 31, 2023 1 hour ago, essex canary said: To be fair I think our Board should be put of charge of global warming. Then it will come to a halt. dunno they'd be a lack of decent demonstrators available for protests, but we'd be building more infrastructure Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essex canary 497 Posted March 31, 2023 2 minutes ago, KiwiScot said: dunno they'd be a lack of decent demonstrators available for protests, but we'd be building more infrastructure At the training ground. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites