Xavi- Poor Mans Ian Crook

Why should we be that worried. Omozusi has looked solid at centre-back recently.

[quote user="we are rubbish"]who cares what you think we8wba....sod off[/quote]He appears to have more sense than you. So if anyone should sod off.

[quote user="Jimmy Smith"]what happens when they''re put in and can''t hack it tho?[/quote]Then we''re in no worse a position than we are already.

[quote user="grantroederdisaster"][quote user="Fabregas- Poor Mans Ian Crook"][quote user="grantroederdisaster"] Football is a results business end of the day and most of the time this season we aren''t getting good results!   On Tuesday night other than the goals we were by far the better team, playing good football while Watford were very limited. But at the end of the day they one more goal than us so deserved to win end of story.   I find it worrying that we dominate a cr*p team like Watford yet still lose - thats relegation form!   It annoys me when fans go on about "I wouldn''t want us to play like Stoke" bullsh*t!   I would like to us play like Stoke cause they have been successful while we haven''t. Stoke are only direct in the final 3rd, which is where you should be direct in my opinion and its one of Norwichs biggest failings in recent years. You don''t win games by dominating pocession but being powderpuff in the final 3rd and not putting the ball in the net which was us at Watford the other night!   Stoke probably play more football than us at the back and in midfield if the truth be said. [/quote]Why don''t you go and support stoke then. Norwich are a footballing team and so they should be. People like you who just want results are glory hunters who don''t care about the club. You just want to be able to say, i saw the good teams play not that Norwich play like a good team and hopefully become a good team.[/quote]   I won''t support Stoke because I''m from Norwich and thats why I support Norwich. If I came from Stoke then I would support either them or Port Vale!   If you''ve been to more games than me - 5-600, been on 4-5 pre season tours, seen Norwich play on more than 90 grounds then you''d of done well sir, but calling me a glory hunter is laughable and to say I don''t care about the club is equally so!   I''ve probably forgot more games than you''ve been to and I''d guess you are more than likely still going to school! [/quote]Why is it laughable to suggest you don''t care about the club. You want the clubs reputation to be demolished by playing hoofball. Carrow Road will be a fortress again if we keep playing proper football.

[quote user="grantroederdisaster"]Football is a results business end of the day and most of the time this season we aren''t getting good results!   On Tuesday night other than the goals we were by far the better team, playing good football while Watford were very limited. But at the end of the day they one more goal than us so deserved to win end of story.   I find it worrying that we dominate a cr*p team like Watford yet still lose - thats relegation form!   It annoys me when fans go on about "I wouldn''t want us to play like Stoke" bullsh*t!   I would like to us play like Stoke cause they have been successful while we haven''t. Stoke are only direct in the final 3rd, which is where you should be direct in my opinion and its one of Norwichs biggest failings in recent years. You don''t win games by dominating pocession but being powderpuff in the final 3rd and not putting the ball in the net which was us at Watford the other night!   Stoke probably play more football than us at the back and in midfield if the truth be said. [/quote]Why don''t you go and support stoke then. Norwich are a footballing team and so they should be. People like you who just want results are glory hunters who don''t care about the club. You just want to be able to say, i saw the good teams play not that Norwich play like a good team and hopefully become a good team.

[quote user="jas the barclay king"][quote user="We Want Worthy Back"] Disagree with you SM. Would hate to see Stoke-style football being played at Carrow Road. Traditionally we are a proper footballing side, and thats how it should stay. For more aesthetically pleasing than hoof ball, and dare I say more effective if plyed properly. Problem is that too often this season we have resorted to our hoof ball game - stick to the good performances and the results will follow. [/quote] would you rather get relegated passing the ball or win the league playing hoofball???? success is sweet is it not? if we had to get it by being like Stoke then so be it... the same stoke who have beaten Arsenal thi season... the gunners defence are used to quick passing play and short throw ins.. for a supposed "big 4" side they looked pretty clueless when faced with a bunh of hoofing lugs who keep things physical. jas :) [/quote] I would rather we got relegated playing football, than got promoted playing like stoke.

[quote user="Eggy"]Play Lupoli and sell Russell never really rated Russell and certainly not as a striker. He''s not in my team on Football manager. Lappin is though where is he?[/quote]Sadly life isn''t like Football manager. You can''t just search and find all the prospects. Look at stats given to chilean youngsters like Nicolas Millan and then get him.

[quote user="1st Wizard"][quote user="Fabregas- Poor Mans Ian Crook"][quote user="IBA"]I''ll stick to football thanks[/quote]Agree I would hate to see Norwich start playing like Stoke. If they did i would stop coming. [/quote] So you wouldn''t watch City in the Premier then? sorry, I just don''t believe you! [/quote]If i had the choice of watching Norwich playing hoofball inthe Prem or not going. Personally i wouldn''t go because it would be embarassing to watch.

[quote user="IBA"]I''ll stick to football thanks[/quote]Agree I would hate to see Norwich start playing like Stoke. If they did i would stop coming.

[quote user="grantroederdisaster"][quote user="Alex"][quote user="grantroederdisaster"] Hes taking a big risk on a 31YO, Cort[/quote] How''s that then? I fail to see what a ''big risk'' a free player is. If it doesn''t work out, so what?????? [/quote]   From the clubs point of view if it don''t work out it will be wasted money and add to our struggles so far this term could lead to possible relegation!   From Roedernowheres point of view it will infuriate fans like myself who know that in the real world it was a crap deciaion to release Hucks. We all know Roeder does favourites and ultimately it could be another sorry episode in Roeders managerial career that all added up makes the fact that hes a crap manager and no good for our club! [/quote]Still disagree that releasing Hucks was a bad move. It was the righht time for him to move, the money freed up from his wages has allowed us to bring in more players like Hoolahan and probably Bell, not sure about exact amounts

[quote user="SuperWesIrishWizard"][quote user="Alex"][quote user="USAcanary"] LOL, I dont think they will be talking for a while. In my opinion it sounded like Clarke never told Roeder about going for the Huddersfield town job. Why else would Roeder come out in the press and say the press stories were total rubbish. Turned out they were completely true. Roeder would not lie if he knew it would make him look bad. (which it has) In his post match interview last night he said both he and Lee had "moved on" He didnt sound happy about it.   [/quote]   Agreed USA - you have it bang on. It''s quite obvious Roeder knew nothing about all of this and Clarke/Huddersfield etc orchestrated this behind Glenn''s back... He''s been royally stitched that''s for sure. LIKE Roeder knew secretly about Clarke''s meetings with Huddersfield and thought ''Right, i''m going to make myself look a right prize cock and announce to all Canary supporters the speculation is b0110ck5, even though we''ve all signed his leaving card in the office''... [/quote] Exactly. In addition, didnt we have 730 applications to manage after Worthy left?  I find it likely that Clark sent a copy of his CV and a letter begging to be given to chance to get out of Norwich. [/quote] How many of the 730 were wiz under different names?

Great shot stopper. Just doesn''t have the confidence to take balls in the air or come and claim them.

It''s gotta be playing good football. If we don''t resort to route 1, keep passing the ball, Carrow Road will be a fortress again.

[quote user="pete_norw"][quote user="Beauseant"] [quote user="tribes"]What is the big blokes name who does fitness with team?. He is on pitch with team before match. The one who looks unfit.[/quote]     Jabba the Hut [/quote] I think he''s the Goal keeper coach [/quote] No joke. I think he is the Nutritionist.

I think Lee Clark is quality, i have never seen someone with more passion. I am disappointed that he is going but he wants to be a manager. I hope we can bring in a new assistant with some passion as well.

[quote user="john"] Fabregas- Poor Mans Ian Crook wrote the following post at 09/12/2008 10:27 PM: Carl Cort will play 5 minutes and be injured for the rest of the season   and how do you know that? have you a crystal ball? you must be a PRICK, give the bloke a chance before you slate him, he was once bought for 7 million so someone saw something in him.   [/quote] Firstly where in my post did i slate him, i didn''t so maybe you should learn to read you thick ****. Secondly Carl Cort is about as injury prone as Darren Anderton and chances are will get injured again.

[quote user="Tipster101"] [quote user="dhickl"]I wasn''t impressed with his action when Ips had a one on one.  He was playing the player onside, and instead of tracking back he was stood still with his hand up looking at the linesman.  Once he realised that he wasn''t offside he started running.  By then it was too late, but fortunate that Marsh made the save.[/quote]   what are you talking about. When Walters went clean through, it was from his own header on. He couldn''t be offside as he was the one who headed the ball. The player who was offside stood still and the defence looked to call for offside, but it wasnt given as the other attacking player did not affect play. Walters saw this and ran through onto his own flick on. So Doc was not playing him onside at all as he couldn''t be offside anyway [/quote] Although you are right about the offside I did find it hard to work out how Walters won his own flick on. Both Doc and Omozusi had great games. So I can let them off the mistake.

[quote user="ncfcrule"]He is one of the only players that i believe can change a math your opinions?? [/quote]Not sure he can change a match. You know what you''re getting with Croft. A lot of running, a lot of bad final balls and maybe a couple of good crosses.

Carl Cort will play 5 minutes and be injured for the rest of the season

In terms of importance gotta be Goss in Munich, Europe, in Munich, no english team had ever beaten Bayern in Munich, Crofts was good but not the best ever by a long way.

Agree, simply can''t be dropped after an outstanding performance against scum.

He is old and well past him prime. If he wasn''t he would still be playing for a good team. His previous exploits in England were not that productive. Why we would even think about wasting money on him is beyond me. If we had to play a target man i would rather play Renton, young, something to prove not someone whos just looking for a bit more money before retiring.

Curo is past it. Even Paul Daniels couldn''t convert him into a good player. I''ve said it before, i''ll say it again i''d rather start a game with 10 men than let Jamie start.

Elliot and Doc were outstanding today. Clinkers and Hoolahan quality as well. Disappointed with Bertrand, Bell and Semmy, just didn''t seem as up for it.

[quote user="jas the barclay king"]years ago! is that tw*t Nick Stone still there? language teacher. sheffield Wednesday fan.. i used to laugh through all his lessons as the blokes a plonker! ask him on Monday if he thinks James Beattie is any good.... jas :) [/quote]Yeh he is. On the topic of good target men, what about Sibierski. Only joking he is useless.