Xavi- Poor Mans Ian Crook

[quote user="WeAreYellows49"][quote user="sam"] Even though i am probably Fotheringhams number 1 hater, i would start him ahead of Russell for the next game, he was diobolical yesterday. And i would also think about dropping Otsemobor, he has been useless for the last few weeks now, he takes so much time on the ball and only shows his pace in flashes, so inconsistent. [/quote] Hmmmm yes Semmy hasn''t been as good this season as last, not really sure what his problem was yesterday but I lost count the amount of times he just stood and watched the ball without running or even jogging.  Maybe he''s not been well or had a niggling injury, but if he wasn''t 100% he shouldn''t have been played.  He was in the whole inaffective [:|] [/quote] Or maybe he is just overrated and not a good footballer.

Grow up Barclayman. They weren''t match fit got about 10 minutes and were trying to do what Cort had done so well all game. What is the point is just saying they were awful when the team were desperate for a goal and were just lumping it up without order or discipline.

Did anyone else notice how when Marsh palms the ball out the wolves players were there to score whereas when we had shots yesterday Basso was palming them out but with no-one following up. Maybe that''s why they are top and we are where we are.

Marsh is a good keeper who just needs to learn to kick.Wiz, with marsh being a keeper his mistakes nearly always cost goals whereas JC his makes a mistake he can just turn round and hope to try again. So he would cost more points than a striker but he does throughout a season will save us more points than he loses. Unfortunately i can''t say the same about Curo.

[quote user="TheMarshmallowMonkey"][quote user="sheringhamcanary"]The single most frustrating player I have ever seen!! he has the ability to be the best full back in the league.. But he is so incapable of tracking the left midfieder. So that says to me that he has to be in the team for his brilliant attacking support to the winger. He has pace to burn and could leave any full back for dead but he seems to need the crowd to tell him to run with the ball. If it was up to him he would just float about in his own little world. [/quote]Totally right [Y] People who say Otsemobor is a poor player aren''t watching him. He''s a great full back, capable of so much more. But he never shows it. [quote]Seems to me that under Roeder he was scared to attack in fear that if he made a mistake he would be dropped. Basically his confidence is shot and i pray for the day he bombs past crofty and supplies a great cross!! I can dream..[/quote]Don''t agree with this though. I don''t see how his confidence comes into it. It''s a simple case of laziness if you ask me. [/quote] If he''s NEVER shows his ability doesn''t that make him a poor player.

I am desperate to get anyone in who can play RB. Jon is awful and his pace seems to be a myth because we never see it and he gets beaten in races to the ball by wingers every week.

I think Cort would have stayed on if he wasn''t completely shattered because he was by far our best player yesterday.

[quote user="ricky knight"] [quote user="Mr. Bump"]Lets play Gunn in goal, he''s a nice guy Lets play Butterworth in defence, he''s a nice guy Sod it, let''s just play everyone who''s nice and likes Norwich City, regardless of the result. Anyone free for a game on Saturday? [/quote] Ok, In the same way all Wolves goals came from mistakes, do we then drop half the team, no, we say its a great result at the league leaders and hope to push on saturday [/quote] The people in question mafe mistakes but have played well and made up for those errors in other games. Whereas Jamie has scored 1 goal missed chances that anybody would score and ran around anonomously when he does play. We need to play someone who will score goals. Not just the easy chances and the half chances as well this you will not get from JC.

I don''t think Wiz would do a worse job than Curo.

[quote user="TheMarshmallowMonkey"][quote user="lincoln canary"] there should be two changes - hoolahan for bertrand as he did not deserve to be dropped last night, and gow/killen/mcdonlad for cureton [/quote] LC, Hoolahan wasn''t dropped for anything other than tactical reasons. Wolves main attacking threat comes down the right side, Gunny was totally right playing Drury and Bertrand to make us solid down that side. Against Bristol, though, I think I''d be looking at Hoolahan. [/quote] Exactly we played Drury and Berty to try to stop Kightley from tearing us to bits. When he went off we didn''t need the defensive cover so we could bring on an out and out winger.

[quote user="Gentleman Jim"] [quote user="Fabregas- Poor Mans Ian Crook"]JC has not been scoring and wasting great chances since he left colchester. That''s not a bad patch that''s a bad player.[/quote] A bad patch can be any length of time, he is not a bad player his team contribution is good he just isn''t scoring unfortunately. Nearly every week ,a little while back, it was Doc who was having a bad time but now he is in favour, if we had dumped him we would be all the poorer. We always seem to have to get on the back of one player don''t we ? So I suppose we will drive Jamie away then find someone else for a whipping boy eh ?     [/quote] How can you call running around anonomously a good team contribution.

JC misses the sitters because he is sh*t and past it.

JC has not been scoring and wasting great chances since he left colchester. That''s not a bad patch that''s a bad player.

Curo is just not good enough for this level. The chances he wastes are awful. He is anonymous when he is on the pitch. We need to give Cody or Gow a chance alongside Cort. Try to find some mugs who want to pay to take JC away from us.

Whatever we payed for him like 700k or something in that region you don''t expect him to miss sitters which he has done on too many occassions.

Mistakes from the defence but how on earth does Jamie manage to miss them.

He couldn''t score in a brothel.

[quote user="we are rubbish"][quote user="grantroederdisaster"] [quote user="Buckethead"]Not happy. His goals to minutes played ratio was far better than anything we''ve seen here for years and you never felt out of it when we just needed the odd goal and Lupes was playing.  Sorry but it smacks of favouritism to me not valid footballing reasons that JC was picked ahead of him, and I like many others reallly struggle to understand how Rusty could be picked for a start as a Striker over somebody who has turned up and done his job every time he was given half a chance. Good player poorly managed.[:(] [/quote]   Very true!   One of my biggests problems with Roeder was inability and/or refusal to play his best 11.   Lupolis a different level to Cureton!   Very disapointed that a capable player has left! [/quote]different level to cureton.........you talk crap,selfish,hog and hot headed,glad he has gone[/quote] Different level as in able to finish chances that don''t have to be absolute sitters. Actually looks comfortable on the ball and can use it with some quality.  When he plays he actually touches the ball instead of running around anonomously. We have missed a trick with Lupoli. I think he will do well at Sheff Utd if given the chance.

Maybe if we renamed Carrow Road, The Bernabau we could confuse foreign players and get some quality.

Do you know there were clauses in the contract or is that speculation. But Omozusi probably should be started following the rubbish Jono has given so far this season.

I don''t think that the loan players were the problem. People like Bell (when he played) and Otsemoboor put in less effort and have less passion than all the loans and compared to how much enthusiasm Leroy had when he was here are an absolute disgrace.

I don''t think it is unfair. Bell was so lazy and if he needed surgery and could not run then he should have got it sorted because the effort he was putting in was minimal at best.

Easier said than done, good experienced strikers cost money.

[quote user="shortfatb"]How f***ing hard is it to spell Cullum? [/quote]Apparently too hard.

Glad he has gone, didn''t look at all interested when on the pitch. Put in a few good corners and a few good crosses nowhere near as much quality as some on here make out. The quality balls are nearly as few and far between as croft but without the passion. I''d play Croft over Bell anyday.