dpit 1 Posted April 22, 2013 Post championship winning interview and one of the main things the Celtic manager wants to say is that Hooper''s going nowhere. Methinks he is setting his stall out to try and drive up his price again. Let''s follow up on our good work in January and not get dragged into silly money territory. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Wal 315 Posted April 22, 2013 I hope Lennon keeps to his word. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pete 371 Posted April 22, 2013 Hooper not worth £5m, Lennon would disagree of course. Stokes looks a better bet than Hooper and much cheaper sinco out of contract. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 335 Posted April 22, 2013 Can get better for the same cash from overseas - if we need to sign someone else. Would rather simply not go back for him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted April 22, 2013 I don''t want him.He was kind of the right man at the right time, but for the wrong money. I feel we have moved on and I doubt we''ll go back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
birchfest 401 Posted April 22, 2013 We got the pick of the ''january target'' bunch to be honest, RVW is the superior player and frankly Id be suprised if we went for Hooper. Its pace and creativity we need now, Hooper will be over priced and too similar style (though not as good) as RVW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The ghost of Michael Theoklitos 0 Posted April 22, 2013 Straight swap for Holt. Nothing more, nothing less.I think that move would suite both players respective careers as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CDMullins 498 Posted April 22, 2013 [quote user="pete"]Hooper not worth £5m, Lennon would disagree of course. Stokes looks a better bet than Hooper and much cheaper sinco out of contract.[/quote]youre joking right?Stokes is terrible, absolutly dyer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,359 Posted April 22, 2013 RVW > Hooper.I''m glad we didn''t sign him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
......and Smith must score. 1,599 Posted April 22, 2013 [quote user="CDMullins"][quote user="pete"]Hooper not worth £5m, Lennon would disagree of course. Stokes looks a better bet than Hooper and much cheaper sinco out of contract.[/quote]youre joking right?Stokes is terrible, absolutly dyer[/quote]No, that''s Kieran [;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dpit 1 Posted April 22, 2013 What about the Greek guy? No. That Samaras, that Samaras,I do not like that Samaras Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The ghost of Michael Theoklitos 0 Posted April 22, 2013 [quote user="AJ"]RVW > Hooper.I''m glad we didn''t sign him[/quote]But that''s not the question.Surely the question is;is Hooper > Holt or Kamara or Bechio?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,359 Posted April 22, 2013 True, but if the money they were holding out for Hooper on was true, then RVW is a much, much, much better deal! Surely RVW and Hooper are too similar to play up top together? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 8,758 Posted April 22, 2013 I''d still take Hooper- I think having him, Van Wolfswinke, Kamara, Holt and Bechio gives us a good variety of players and styles upfront. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites