Club Finances in 2008

[essex canary 622]

The attached from the Archive is much more understandable for the layman than the published accounts (wonky photo aside).

[TIL 1010 5,246]

oh my word, get help FFS !

 

[essex canary 622]

8 minutes ago, TIL 1010 said:

oh my word, get help FFS !

 

Always better to discuss St. Andrews Hall from that era.

[TIL 1010 5,246]

2 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Always better to discuss St. Andrews Hall from that era.

On second thoughts you are beyond help.

[norwich canary 171]

Thanks for that Essex I know little about the workings of a balance sheet. Could you give me an in depth explanation why this is better than what is produced today. Thanks 

[shefcanary 2,955]

??????????????

As an FCA, no it ****ing isn't!!!

[TIL 1010 5,246]

The mission to destroy this forum continues by our resident clown.

[Google Bot 3,934]

4 minutes ago, shefcanary said:

As an FCA, no it ****ing isn't!!!

He did say for the layman, to be fair.

It's interesting from a supporter perspective to see it broken down chronologically like that, but ultimately I don't have much interest in it all, my eyes are more drawn to the score and the lineups at the bottom! 🙂

[PurpleCanary 6,386]

35 minutes ago, shefcanary said:

??????????????

As an FCA, no it ****ing isn't!!!

Now you know what the doctor said about reading Essex's posts. Go and have a nice lie down...

[essex canary 622]

1 hour ago, norwich canary said:

Thanks for that Essex I know little about the workings of a balance sheet. Could you give me an in depth explanation why this is better than what is produced today. Thanks 

The first thing is it isn't a Balance Sheet which is a cumulative statement of all years to date. It is a Statement of Profit and Loss for the one most recent year but not in the official format.

The official format advises of Gross Expenditure and Gross Income. This one nets off such items where relevant.

An example is the 'Net Profit on Programnes' of £106,000. This could be made up of Income from Programmes of say  £500,000 less costs of production of £394,000. If these latter 2 figures are correct they will be reflected like that in the official accounts though there is no supporting detail in those accounts showing specifically any figures for Sale of Programmes, they are just aggregated with other items.

@shefcanary reaction seems rather odd as I would have thought seeing these figures work back to Player Wages spend and returns from player transfers like this would be gold dust for him in terms of both last season and this.

[A Load of Squit 6,260]

It was obvious even then that the club were slipping into what became 'cold sausage roll' gate.

[wcorkcanary 4,784]

2 minutes ago, A Load of Squit said:

It was obvious even then that the club were slipping into what became 'cold sausage roll' gate.

I'm surprised  that 'someone" hasn't managed to lay the blame for those sausage rolls at Zoes door, despite it being well before her taking up a position with us. 

[wcorkcanary 4,784]

1 hour ago, norwich canary said:

Thanks for that Essex I know little about the workings of a balance sheet. Could you give me an in depth explanation why this is better than what is produced today. Thanks 

 

6 minutes ago, essex canary said:

The first thing is it isn't a Balance Sheet which is a cumulative statement of all years to date. It is a Statement of Profit and Loss for the one most recent year but not in the official format.

The official format advises of Gross Expenditure and Gross Income. This one nets off such items where relevant.

An example is the 'Net Profit on Programnes' of £106,000. This could be made up of Income from Programmes of say  £500,000 less costs of production of £394,000. If these latter 2 figures are correct they will be reflected like that in the official accounts though there is no supporting detail in those accounts showing specifically any figures for Sale of Programmes, they are just aggregated with other items.

@shefcanary reaction seems rather odd as I would have thought seeing these figures work back to Player Wages spend and returns from player transfers like this would be gold dust for him in terms of both last season and this.

Brilliant , the perpetually dishonest  tries to educate the terminally stupid.

[essex canary 622]

2 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said:

I'm surprised  that 'someone" hasn't managed to lay the blame for those sausage rolls at Zoes door, despite it being well before her taking up a position with us. 

The problem is we still haven't got enough money for any hot sausages.

[wcorkcanary 4,784]

2 minutes ago, essex canary said:

The problem is we still haven't got enough money for any hot sausages.

Speak for yourself. 

[essex canary 622]

2 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said:

 

Brilliant , the perpetually dishonest  tries to educate the terminally stupid.

Treat yourself to a Hot Dog for Lunch. You may find that it is nourishing.

[TIL 1010 5,246]

19 minutes ago, essex canary said:

The first thing is it isn't a Balance Sheet which is a cumulative statement of all years to date. It is a Statement of Profit and Loss for the one most recent year but not in the official format.

The official format advises of Gross Expenditure and Gross Income. This one nets off such items where relevant.

An example is the 'Net Profit on Programnes' of £106,000. This could be made up of Income from Programmes of say  £500,000 less costs of production of £394,000. If these latter 2 figures are correct they will be reflected like that in the official accounts though there is no supporting detail in those accounts showing specifically any figures for Sale of Programmes, they are just aggregated with other items.

@shefcanary reaction seems rather odd as I would have thought seeing these figures work back to Player Wages spend and returns from player transfers like this would be gold dust for him in terms of both last season and this.

As expected someone cannot see that the pi$$ was being taken to induce this response.

[wcorkcanary 4,784]

10 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Treat yourself to a Hot Dog for Lunch. You may find that it is nourishing.

Had live yog n fruit at 05-30 , brunch at 1130، a little kedgeree ,organic brown basmatti of course  , so no , as I don't eat that kind of processed rubbish I will  decline , but not politely,  you tw@. Next meal around 1830 , organic ribeye cooked over home made charcoal...could be worse, Waveney might be my  only ally on here, and as Tillo pointed out he's  mugging you off anyway,now that would be sad.  

 

 

Edited July 31 by wcorkcanary

[wcorkcanary 4,784]

2 minutes ago, TIL 1010 said:

As expected someone cannot see that the pi$$ was being taken to induce this response.

He'll be adopting Waveneys Scampi campaign soon enough under his umbrella of grievances, soon to be moved to the O2 Arena as the only venue with space enough to accommodate them.

[essex canary 622]

4 minutes ago, TIL 1010 said:

As expected someone cannot see that the pi$$ was being taken to induce this response.

So I shouldn't have answered the question. That seems like a double standard on your part but no surprise there.

[TIL 1010 5,246]

12 minutes ago, essex canary said:

So I shouldn't have answered the question. That seems like a double standard on your part but no surprise there.

No double standards from me as i have thought you were a plank from Day 1 and this thread confirms those thoughts.

Edited July 31 by TIL 1010

[cambridgeshire canary 7,798]

I see Essex has yet again snorted one line too many before posting

[essex canary 622]

This is sizzling along nicely.

Has anyone brought along the dynamite?

[......and Smith must score. 1,596]

7 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said:

I see Essex has yet again snorted one line too many before posting

They say don't judge a book by it's cover but I've met Kevin and I'll bet the only lines that interest him are those wrapped round spreadsheets.

Edited July 31 by ......and Smith must score.

[essex canary 622]

2 minutes ago, ......and Smith must score. said:

They say don't judge a book by it's cover but I've met Kevin and I'll bet the only lines that interest him are those wrapped round spreadsheets.

The Spreadsheet is a marvellous invention. Nobody knows that better than NCFC. Problem is sometimes you need to know not just the figures but the value behind it. That is where they are lacking.

[TIL 1010 5,246]

13 minutes ago, essex canary said:

The Spreadsheet is a marvellous invention. Nobody knows that better than NCFC. Problem is sometimes you need to know not just the figures but the value behind it. That is where they are lacking.

Slowly but surely we are getting around to that stick you were desperately seeking for in the opening post .

[wcorkcanary 4,784]

4 minutes ago, TIL 1010 said:

Slowly but surely we are getting around to that stick you were desperately seeking for in the opening post .

It's good fun insulting him while he seeks said stick though. 

Even he can't actually believe  half the stuff he posts surely. 

[essex canary 622]

1 hour ago, TIL 1010 said:

Slowly but surely we are getting around to that stick you were desperately seeking for in the opening post .

Just a reminder of the 'we are all in this together' philosophy

Andrew Cullen's Port Vale Programme Notes - Portsmouth FC

Andrew Cullen's Accrington Programme Notes - Portsmouth FC

[TIL 1010 5,246]

28 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Just a reminder of the 'we are all in this together' philosophy

Andrew Cullen's Port Vale Programme Notes - Portsmouth FC

Andrew Cullen's Accrington Programme Notes - Portsmouth FC

What are Pompey doing that is or has not been done in some way, shape or form at Norwich City ?

[Wibble 153]

3 hours ago, wcorkcanary said:

I'm surprised  that 'someone" hasn't managed to lay the blame for those sausage rolls at Zoes door, despite it being well before her taking up a position with us. 

Here here, the sausage roll situation is a scandal. A little imagination and some chorizo would go down a treat.

Maybe even a touch of black pudding and a nice mustard.