Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

I don't understand why people moan so much about us selling valuable players like the club should be blamed for it when they know full well this is essential for the club's survival . Frustrating as it is, it's just economic reality.

Yep it's what a mid table championship team have to do. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Big Vince said:

Yes, they are lifelong Labour, the pair of them. Wynnie used to work for The Mirror for pete sake.

Do you even know how a socialist system works?

A core element of a socialist system is common ownership, which, as you know, can take various forms, including state ownership, cooperative ownership by workers and consumers, and community ownership. Common ownership aims to address issues such as economic inequality, exploitation, and the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few. 

So, how do you square this with Delia & Co’s actions and decisions?

Oh wait, you can’t. 
 

Troll Grade: C- must try harder 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ken Hairy said:

So £95 million from a group of players who collectively cost £20 million? Now I'm no Delia fan, but that in any business would be deemed successful. 

Except the business is a football club. That's why they get a free ride , no ambition from fans. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Big Vince said:

You poor fool. You have fallen straight into the trap Delia set for you.

Hahahahahaha!

You’re too funny. The only fools are the one who actually believe that what you have to say has any substance.

You’re so predictable. If your messages weren’t so entertaining, you’d be forgotten.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Big Vince said:

But certainly not with Norwich because as sure as night follows day, Delia will sell.

In fact, Delia is desperate to be in the Championship again next season because it gives her the green light to rake in £95 million from selling Rowe, Sargent, Sara and Sainz.

Can sadly see those players all leaving if we are still in the champs. But who’d have thought we’d have £100 million in value on 4 players a few months back..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Creedence Clearwater Couto said:

Can sadly see those players all leaving if we are still in the champs. But who’d have thought we’d have £100 million in value on 4 players a few months back..

I think you are going way over the top if you think those 4 are worth 100 million,  or is that with the club add ons . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sufyellow said:

I think you are going way over the top if you think those 4 are worth 100 million,  or is that with the club add ons . 

Rowe 20 million… Sainz 15 million… Sara £30 million.. Sargent £30 million… just under, but we should be holding out for those sort of valuations, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CirclePoint said:

Do you even know how a socialist system works?

A core element of a socialist system is common ownership, which, as you know, can take various forms, including state ownership, cooperative ownership by workers and consumers, and community ownership. Common ownership aims to address issues such as economic inequality, exploitation, and the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few. 

So, how do you square this with Delia & Co’s actions and decisions?

Oh wait, you can’t. 
 

Troll Grade: C- must try harder 

Easy. Delia and Wynnie support the Labour Party. And Labour want to stop the rich being rich. But, like all socialists, it doesn't stop them taking money when it suits. Tony Blair being a good example. There's a saying in politics that Conservatives get caught with their trousers down and Labourites get caught with their snouts in the trough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Big Vince said:

Easy. Delia and Wynnie support the Labour Party. And Labour want to stop the rich being rich. But, like all socialists, it doesn't stop them taking money when it suits. Tony Blair being a good example. There's a saying in politics that Conservatives get caught with their trousers down and Labourites get caught with their snouts in the trough.

So what were you up to with your trousers down and who caught you?

Come on Vincey, spill those beans…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Big Vince said:

Easy. Delia and Wynnie support the Labour Party. And Labour want to stop the rich being rich. But, like all socialists, it doesn't stop them taking money when it suits. Tony Blair being a good example. There's a saying in politics that Conservatives get caught with their trousers down and Labourites get caught with their snouts in the trough.

*Cough* 

 

Covid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Big Vince said:

Easy. Delia and Wynnie support the Labour Party. And Labour want to stop the rich being rich. But, like all socialists, it doesn't stop them taking money when it suits. Tony Blair being a good example. There's a saying in politics that Conservatives get caught with their trousers down and Labourites get caught with their snouts in the trough.

But, if they take money when it suits them, then they’re not socialists. So your original accusation of Delia & Co doesn’t align with your conclusion of them.

However, a business owner can do whatever they want with the profits of their business.

But, on further exploration of your point, it seems that you yourself are actually coming across as a socialist, if indeed you are expecting Delia & Co to spend their money on behalf of you (for your entertainment.) Meaning, they’re rich enough to own a football club that turns a profit and you want them to spend that money on your behalf (because you aren’t rich enough to own a football club).

Give it some thought before your ego breaks free again and you start glomming together other sound bites that you found on the internet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Creedence Clearwater Couto said:

Rowe 20 million… Sainz 15 million… Sara £30 million.. Sargent £30 million… just under, but we should be holding out for those sort of valuations, IMO.

30 million each for Sargent and Sara , no chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sufyellow said:

30 million each for Sargent and Sara , no chance.

The funny thing is although you are doing well this year, most of your players are s*** or journeymen. If you get promoted, you will have to spend £20m on a goalie for a start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sufyellow said:

30 million each for Sargent and Sara , no chance.

So you even watch NCFC games a lot as well as continuously hanging around this NCFC forum.

Clearly you must, as you seem to have a knowledge of our players and the Premier League and its transfers that you would not have got from watching your own club in action at the top table since twenty odd years ago.

That's too sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Sufyellow said:

30 million each for Sargent and Sara , no chance.

Not according to people closer than us. 

Sargent will end up on at least 20 goals this season and missed nearly half of it. His goals per minute ratio is currently 1 every 91 minutes. It’s exceptional. Look at how effective he is when he players, ie our win ratio with and without him. Also exceptional. And he’s only 23.

Name me another striker similar in style to Sargent? There aren’t any, he’ll be in high demand. £30 million is not far off.

Sara is EPL bound for sure. His form recently has been exceptional and he’s a naturally gifted footballer. Finish the season at his current rate, and he’ll well have surpassed the goals and assists Emi produced in 20-21. Emi went for £33million… £30 million is also not far off for Sara.

Before you discredit with ‘no chance’ do a bit of research and look at the tangibles. Both players are worth top money.

Edited by Creedence Clearwater Couto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP may well be trolling but there is more than an element of truth in the point he makes in the original post.

Webber used the “he was desperate to leave” line to justify a sale the club needed/wanted to make to fund other transfers. And it shows again how harmful our ownership model was to our prem survival prospects. Meanwhile, the slowest takeover in world history limps on. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Creedence Clearwater Couto said:

Not according to people closer than us. 

Sargent will end up on at least 20 goals this season and missed nearly half of it. His goals per minute ratio is currently 1 every 91 minutes. It’s exceptional. Look at how effective he is when he players, ie our win ratio with and without him. Also exceptional. And he’s only 23.

Name me another striker similar in style to Sargent? There aren’t any, he’ll be in high demand. £30 million is not far off.

Sara is EPL bound for sure. His form recently has been exceptional and he’s a naturally gifted footballer. Finish the season at his current rate, and he’ll well have surpassed the goals and assists Emi produced in 20-21. Emi went for £33million… £30 million is also not far off for Sara.

Before you discredit with ‘no chance’ do a bit of research and look at the tangibles. Both players are worth top money.

He also comes with a dodgy ankle , is that the same ankle he damaged in the world Cup, he also played in the prem for a season even though he was settling in. He is also our main striker where we play to his strengths,  he also misses alot of chances. Add to that if you haven't noticed,  clubs are getting point deductions for over spending. We would probably get under 20 million then plus add ons. Sara the same. They are great for us though. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Well b back said:

The funny thing is although you are doing well this year, most of your players are s*** or journeymen. If you get promoted, you will have to spend £20m on a goalie for a start.

Are you OK? I think Gunn is one of our better players , plus 4 good players have already been named, you are right unfortunately about most of the rest though, Kenny has had a good season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, BroadstairsR said:

So you even watch NCFC games a lot as well as continuously hanging around this NCFC forum.

Clearly you must, as you seem to have a knowledge of our players and the Premier League and its transfers that you would not have got from watching your own club in action at the top table since twenty odd years ago.

That's too sad.

I was watching them before you were born, only just though.  But great thought out comment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sufyellow said:

I was watching them before you were born, only just though.  But great thought out comment. 

Oh dear!

Just aping what others have posted and that previous comment. I haven't "watched" you, as such, so I don't need your history.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, BroadstairsR said:

Oh dear!

Just aping what others have posted and that previous comment. I haven't "watched" you, as such, so I don't need your history.

You obviously did , you thought I was an Ipswich fan. So I don't believe the valuations of our players are realistic? Most of our fans over estimate our players, but that's what fans do. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, CirclePoint said:

Do you even know how a socialist system works?

A core element of a socialist system is common ownership, which, as you know, can take various forms, including state ownership, cooperative ownership by workers and consumers, and community ownership. Common ownership aims to address issues such as economic inequality, exploitation, and the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few. 

So, how do you square this with Delia & Co’s actions and decisions?

Oh wait, you can’t. 
 

Troll Grade: C- must try harder 

You're right. He should have said Champagne Socialist.  That's socialism for others but not for me. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sufyellow said:

Are you OK? I think Gunn is one of our better players , plus 4 good players have already been named, you are right unfortunately about most of the rest though, Kenny has had a good season. 

I was clearly talking about your goalie, you binners do give the game away with the colours you use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23/03/2024 at 12:40, Big Vince said:

Very revealing in Webber's departing interview that he stated Buendia had to be sold by the club whereas at the time it was spun as the player wanting to leave and there was nothing the club could do about it. Just goes to underscore once again the deceitful way in which Delia runs the club. 

Webber also points out what anyone with insight knew at the time, but which was denied by the club, that is, Webber was working with both hands tied behind his back by the Socialists. I mean, how could you possibly successfully stay up with having spent 750K on the boy Byrum as the only signing and then next time round having to sell Buendia to fund the likes of Sargent, Tzolis, Rashica, PLM, who were never going to be up to EPL standard anyway.

Webber now says Mr Norfolk is super-ambitious. Well, let's start seeing the colour of his money then because any successful tilt at EPL survival is now reckoned at £300 million in season 1.

Have you been let out again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Well b back said:

I was clearly talking about your goalie, you binners do give the game away with the colours you use.

Do you really think I am an Ipswich fan? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sufyellow said:

Do you really think I am an Ipswich fan? 

I’ve always been of the opinion it would be more embarrassing to be a City fan mistaken for a binner than actually being one…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Well b back said:

I was clearly talking about your goalie, you binners do give the game away with the colours you use.

What are you talking about? You are so funny. Mind you 10 more minutes and I will be in Ipswich. I guess you have caught me out. Oh and I have been in the North stand a few times. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, nutty nigel said:

I’ve always been of the opinion it would be more embarrassing to be a City fan mistaken for a binner than actually being one…

I would be more embarrassed to be accusing people of it ? And my embarrasun days finished outside the ground a few seasons ago. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sufyellow said:

I would be more embarrassed to be accusing people of it ? And my embarrasun days finished outside the ground a few seasons ago. 

Nope, being mistaken for a binner on a City forum is the most embarrassing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, nutty nigel said:

Nope, being mistaken for a binner on a City forum is the most embarrassing.

Trust me I have done more embarrassing things for the love of club. Rightly or wrongly. But if Delia had listened we wouldn't be having this conversation,  or the racist ones. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...