Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Making Plans

Barcelona, WTF

Recommended Posts

"How long is he out for?" 

"4 months."

"Make it 5 months 1 day" 

"Yes boss." 

Play the rules. It stinks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So in effect, if a Spanish side fancy strengthening their side prior to a Champions League semi final for instance, they can? WTAF? That really isn’t on at all, what an absolute joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The team they got him from are in the relegation zone and cant replace him. He might have kept them up. Ridiculous rule. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, The Raptor said:

The team they got him from are in the relegation zone and cant replace him. He might have kept them up. Ridiculous rule. 

This. In theory the rule they used is open to any club, this isn’t about big club bias. But there’s no corresponding right for the club who loses a player (every player in Spain has a buyout clause, so the ‘selling’ club has no say in the matter) to buy in turn. Barcelona chose to sell two strikers in the transfer window, they should be the ones who suffer the consequences of that.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It`s their league, they can set their own rules, do not see a problem with it.

He cannot play in any UEFA competition

"The rules allowing Barcelona to sign the 28-year-old stipulated the player they brought in must be a free agent or already playing in Spain and that they can not play in Uefa competition."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Molly Windley said:

It`s their league, they can set their own rules, do not see a problem with it.

He cannot play in any UEFA competition

"The rules allowing Barcelona to sign the 28-year-old stipulated the player they brought in must be a free agent or already playing in Spain and that they can not play in Uefa competition."

Doesn’t mean it’s not a stupid rule though.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The controversy is that the Spanish FA are said to have denied Leganes' request to sign an emergency replacement under the same terms.

I'd say we would probably be livid if that happened to us.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Mason 47 said:

The controversy is that the Spanish FA are said to have denied Leganes' request to sign an emergency replacement under the same terms.

I'd say we would probably be livid if that happened to us.

This is where it does start to look like big club bias.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mason 47 said:

The controversy is that the Spanish FA are said to have denied Leganes' request to sign an emergency replacement under the same terms.

I'd say we would probably be livid if that happened to us.

VAR applied to transfers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other problem in Spain is that they have release clauses. If it was Man Utd or Spurs coming in for Pukki now, we’d tell them where to go. Braithwaite has a release clause of (I think) 15 mil, so the club can’t refuse it. 

That’s what swings it in favour of big clubs. If there were no release clauses, chances are Barca would only be able to go out and get a back up player who wasn’t needed or a shorter term loan. Chances are a smaller club would probably bring in a loanee anyway (because that’s more cost effective for them than triggering a high release clause as injury cover), so it would be much fairer.

With the release clauses though, perhaps the rule ought to be limited to loaning someone in?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...