dylanisabaddog

That's OK! I think it's best left as a lesson to us all. But I'd imagine not many people will have read it. The system allows you to quote someone then change what they have said!

Hello @horsefly I'm a bit baffled by the quote that you have attributed to me. Not something that I wrote! Perhaps someone is having a silly game?

You were number 700. Put it on your CV. Every little helps

The sale of Reeves did i think help to finance the new stand. But I also remember buying some sort of bond that gave me first choice on seats. Which I'm sure is how I ended up with middle block row A upstairs. At least that's how I remember it😂

Oh right. That's OK then, my mistake. I thought it was religion that killed all those people bit it's not. It turns out according to LYB that it's people arguing about religion. I am going to join several others in simply not bothering with you anymore.

I share your pain. A couple of months ago I had a very uncomfortable afternoon at Carrow Road in a forgettable win. When I went to bed I realised I'd had my boxer shorts on back to front. At the next home game I told the people around me about this and they sent me off to the toilets to switch my pants round. This is quite clearly the reason for our upturn in fortunes. That and your cider.

"Religion seems harmless in comparison" That's absolutely laughable. Religion has historically been the root cause of millions of deaths. At the moment the Jews and the Muslims are killing each other in huge numbers in the Holy Land. Perhaps it will be renamed the Hatred Land. Add to that the life changing sexual abuse in the Catholic Church which has affected an enormous number of people and the continued ill treatment of women of Muslim faith. All this over what? A totally unnecessary imaginery friend in the sky.

Just showed this picture to my daughter. She said yes please and asked for him to be delivered. Oh well, never mind.

And 5 years ago today Super Mario scored against Sheffield Wednesday 😊

I like to think of them as non league weekends. But that list is a little bit silly. Nunez is going to spend most of the first half of the season on an aeroplane. God help us if Sara gets in the Brazil squad

We had a council by-election this time last year. The Tory candidates rebranded themselves 'Local Conservatives'. All 3 seats went to local Lib Dems.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2018/02/22/efl-introduce-new-rules-stop-teams-playing-weakened-sides/ We simply need to include 10 outfield players in the 18 who played the game before. So 6 on the bench along with starting the back 4 is OK. I'm sure Josh will be rested but I'd also definitely not play Sainz. He is fouled constantly and is also a red card risk.

There are various ways of looking at it. It's a good warm up for a possible play off game but - Everyone is going to be trying to ensure they don't get injured. Players who are trying not to get hurt sometimes manage to do just that. The only way to ensure no one gets injured is not to play them. James Maddison springs to mind. There are 4 or 5 players we simply can't do without so they really shouldn't be risked. Top of the list is Sargent who should be sitting at home with his feet up.

Hopefully. In fact if things go to plan we will probably be putting out a reserve team.

Nonsense. We'll all club together and buy you a dictionary for Christmas.

Atheism is a lack of belief in God (or God's as there have been around 300 so far). It simply rules out God, nothing else. You can try and make it mean something else but you'd be wrong. You are entitled to your opinion but you are trying to change the simple meaning of a word to support your own views.

One small group of people in the scientific community believe there is a 50/50 chance we are living in a simulation. That is very different from 50% of the scientific community believing it.

Google lens doesn't know who he is. Definitely not Richard Bacon as whoever it is is at work.

If you're not sure, perhaps you could just read it?

S222(6) TCGA92 sets out that spouses or civil partners who are living together can only have one main residence between them for the purpose of private residence relief. If when they marry or register as civil partners they each own a residence and they continue to use both as residences, they can jointly nominate which is to be treated as the main residence. The two year period for making the nomination commences on the date of marriage or the date of registration. 1. The word 'home' isn't used in the legislation or HMRC guidance. In the widest sense of the legislation the only requirement is that one of them spends a night in the 2nd home. 2. A nomination needs to be made within 2 years of the marriage. I don't know for sure but HMRC may accept the address used on a Tax Return as a nomination. She claims to have taken advice so it seems reasonable to assume it was done properly. In general HMRC is relaxed about this legislation. As long as they get CGT on one of the 2 properties they won't be particularly interested. Someone has said that Rayner has now been accused of incorrectly claiming single person reduction on her council tax. I've no idea if that accusation has been made or if it's true. Quite frankly I wouldn't believe anything I read about her at the moment but I'm surprised that the Conservatives are still throwing mud around. She was an electoral liability before this all started and Starmer would be quietly pleased if she is forced to resign. I was astonished to hear Sunak bring the matter up at PMQ'S yesterday. Bearing in mind his personal circumstances he would be better advised to shut up.

Apparently Donald fell asleep in court yesterday. Somehow I doubt Biden will be silly enough to mention it. What a mess

Lovely line from Starmer at PMQ's. Have you read your predecessor's book? I have the only unsigned copy...

Separate Assessment was a form of independent taxation before the introduction around 1990 of what is now called Independent Taxation. I hope that makes sense. It was horrendously complicated but the CG form you refer to became redundant over 30 years ago. There was also something called a Wife's Earnings Election and from memory it was possible to do both. If a client decided on both their accountant would sob quietly in the toilet for half an hour before throwing themselves off the roof. Although Independent Taxation started 30 years ago there were certain exceptions. One of those was the CGT main residence exemption. If husband and wife had been able to elect different residences every married couple with 2 homes (North Norfolk springs to mind) would have avoided CGT on the second home. That would have been expensive. As regards Rayner, I suspect she worried about the rules on selling a council house she'd purchased at a reduced price and the CGT problem. She took advice but a tax planner can't and won't advise on non tax matters other than to encourage people to consider other implications. No one would have thought about the electoral roll. We've no idea what she is alleged to have done. If she used the wrong address on electoral forms she's been silly but if I was her I'd use security as the reason. She and her children are permanently under threat and it would be difficult to argue with. About a year ago I thought I had found the perfect Labour candidate for South Norfolk it's not in my gift by the way but she would have been perfect). She thought about it and did some research and eventually said no because she was worried about the safety of her children. That was nothing to do with Labour, she would have taken the same view if she was Conservative. That's awful isn't it? We need more women in the Labour Party and the one I know would have made an excellent MP.

Who was it in the Labour Party who persuaded Liz Truss to write a book and say she hasn't ruled out coming back as Leader? Probably the greatest political masterstroke this century.

@Fen Canaryis right in that the fact that smokers don't live as long isn't taken into account in studies. That saving is huge both in terms of pension savings and in reducing pressure on the NHS who won't have to deal with those people who would inevitably fill beds with non smoking related issues.