Wings

Definitely let go of Jarvis and Gallacher on permenant deals; I think both have been found surplus to requirements. Beyond that, I''d let Eagle and Halliday out on loan to give them decent match experience. I''d also let Chrissy Martin go out if we secure Ched Evans permenantly. Finally, I''d consider letting Brellier go.

[quote user="Chris Meadows"] Green Steeno, Fleming, Malky, Drury Mcveigh, Holt, Francis, Hucks Bellamy, Iwan [/quote] 100,000,000% agree with that. How any of you can argue against it is beyond me!

You''ve hexed them with strands of your DNA? Great...

Effective protests need credability. Surely protesting on the same day as we should be paying our respects to a Norwich legend is both disrespectful to many and will damage that credability. The protests will become a laughing stock. 

A sad day indeed; my Uncle and I often talk all things City, and his name came up in our conversations just a fortnight ago. Needless to say he went all misty eyed and began telling me with a smile on his face just how amazing he could be and how he''d bleed yellow and green. Let''s hope we come away with three points on Saturday and a performance he''d have been proud of.

[quote user="Geeza"] People! They spent £6 million on him. They are not going to farm him out to a medicore Championship team Get real! [/quote] If you actually read what Roeder says, he does say it''s someone quite young (in tonight''s EEN), who''s moved recently for a lot of money but hasn''t had many chances and may be out of favour. If you can think of anyone else it could be we await with baited breath.

[quote user="Baggie"]Ginger Pele, you really do need to brush up on your command of the English language.......[/quote]English might not be his first language or he might have learning difficulties. Give it a break, will you?

[quote user="fuzzyfelt"]Arthur Whittle:  More Bile and Spittle.[/quote]Replace the word "more" with "pointless" and you''re onto a winner.

Tommy Smith, Darius Henderson and Marlon King. All three are players I''d have here in a shot.

[quote user="1st Wizard"][quote user="Wings"]http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1064267/ShowPost.aspx Nothing but a flip flop fan, I''m afraid. [/quote] All you''ve manage to prove Wings, is your stunning inability to read and digest my posts. I said only a few posts back: Err Wings? where have I ''flip fopped'' on Roeder?, yes, he wasn''t my choice, I said that in a joke thread before he even signed for us! This is the joke thread you''ve linked to, and check the start date of said thread, Roeder wasn''t even here then!. Hell, someone even had to remind you that I started this one!. So stop  pi**ing on our superb performance yesterday by continuing in your childish and petty point scoring, and learn to read properly. Now, lets hammer Watford, I''m pretty sure Glen''s boys will be up for this one too. OTBC. [/quote] Oh come on; that thread is totally sincere and everyone can see that. You''re not fooling anyone, Wiz; not with your stupid attempts to highlight your points with your bold and different colours, not with your claims that the highlighted thread was "just a joke".   So was this a joke? http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1066091/ShowPost.aspx Or this? http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1064020/ShowPost.aspx Or this? http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1065078/ShowPost.aspx But it appears I''m far from the first to notice you''re total lack of credability and conviction. http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1066091/ShowPost.aspx and... http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1065768/ShowPost.aspx ...and my personal favourite.... http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1066225/ShowPost.aspx by Jesse Garon''s twin brother "1st Wizard has always changed his mind like I change my boxer shorts. Although I don''t have many posts now I have been a member on this forum for years under an old password, so I''ve seen many a u turn from him." You "claim" you support the side in the interest of unity. If that were the case, you''d settle on an opinion and stick with it, not pander to the masses. Flip, flop, flip, flop. To be honest, I wouldn''t normally bat an eye lash; but stood there on the stands, feeling the immense pride surging through my veins as my fellow fans around me gave 150% to support their team made me appreciate just how lucky and proud I was to support a side with supporters that showed unflinching loyalty, incredible passion and the sheer determination to do what they can to lift this club out of the misery it finds itself in. You can''t understand my anger at someone who clearly claims to be part of that, when you clearly aren''t. "So stop  pi**ing on our superb performance yesterday by continuing in your childish and petty point scoring, and learn to read properly." I stand up for the fans that have stuck through this club through the bad times; the people on this forum who come here daily and show their support. The people who made the Carrow Road crowd electric; the people up and down the country willing the team on. It''s one thing to be among those who don''t do this; you all know who they are. It''s an entirely different thing altogether to flit between these two camps as and when it suits you, as 1st Wiz clearly does.

[quote user="1st Wizard"][quote user="Wings"] Your flip-flopping of opinion has no weight with me. You are a fan who criticises when it''s easiest to crticise and lumps on the praise during the good times. As soon as it all goes bad again, you''ll be back to sharing the opinions of the aforementioneds and hence I cannot respect you nor deem you someone supporting this side. [/quote] Err Wings? where have I ''flip fopped'' on Roeder?, yes, he wasn''t my choice, I said that in a joke thread before he even signed for us! But I also started a thread supporting him and the players way BEFORE the Ippo game. Likewise, my stance on the board remains the same. As to your lack of respect to me, I do not even value it or seek it, its quite worthless to me, and of no importance whatsoever. I have long since paid my dues in the supporting stakes, home and away, and probably before you were born!.[:|] Now bring on Watford. [/quote] http://new.pinkun.com/cs/forums/1064267/ShowPost.aspx Nothing but a flip flop fan, I''m afraid.

[quote user="itfc_carlin"] Have you just won the FA cup, or have I missed something? Looked like you failed to win at home against a poor Ipswich to me. It was our worst away display of the season by far. You looked very average and will struggle for sure.   And we didn''t hear a peep out of your ''fans'' until you scored. The stands were half empty 5 minutes before half time. Remember now?   BOTLACR [/quote] The day after yours for being promoted. Already. One glance on your message boards last week was like visiting ours when we were promoted.

[quote user="On the Roeder nowhere..."] Of course the players are going to try their best on derby day and the first game of the new manager. I highly doubt they will perform like that against Watford and if they do I will be pleasantly suprised. Don''t get carried away with how amazing Roeder is and how our players are suddenly emerging as great ones.. I think some of you need to watch a few recent performances. But it was a great performance and long may it continue.. [/quote] Frankly I find this post highly hypocritical. You''re blasting the optimists for getting carried away when you''ve clearly gotten carried away yourself with your pessimistic viewpoints. If you cannot accept the positives about today, then I suggest you find another club.  

[quote user="Smudger"]Coz you are about to swing with popular opiniion again maybe???  [+o(][/quote] No, he''s accepting today was a step in the right direction. Few, if any, have overreacted to today''s events - and most have shown the temperance you and Cluck don''t possess to come out and say - right, this is a good sign. But we need more and for the board to back this manager with the money he needs. You and Cluck need a sharp shock; your continued critcism is unwarranted and unnecessary. You fail to recognise any positives and there were alot to come out of today. No one has said the problems are over. Far from it. It is only you who has seemed to construed this and this is why you and Cluck are not Norwich City supporters as you can''t support the club in any circumstance through your narrow minded and stupid viewpoint on this club. In short, you don''t deserve to bare the mantle of a Norwich City fan, as one of the thousands that did this club proud and fans like you bring equal amounts of shame to this club as the board you so viciously villify.

[quote user="1st Wizard"][quote user="Wings"] That''s why Smudger, 1st Wiz and Cluck et al will never have my respect; because they have stopped supporting the side in order to get at the board. Wrong, IMO.[/quote] Please refrain from lumping me in with those 2 posters Wings, the manager, assistant manager and the team all have my backing to get us out of this mess, we have no choice, we must support them. I said this before the scummers game and I don''t intend changing it. The board is a seperate issue. But the club, manager, players and our superb fans come first, okay?. [/quote]Your flip-flopping of opinion has no weight with me. You are a fan who criticises when it''s easiest to crticise and lumps on the praise during the good times. As soon as it all goes bad again, you''ll be back to sharing the opinions of the aforementioneds and hence I cannot respect you nor deem you someone supporting this side.

[quote user="TwoSheds"] Thats it.....one half decent performance. Lets put all the delia and board squit behind us now shall we? Not on your bloody nelly! [/quote] You can support the side without supporting the board you ninny. That''s why Smudger, 1st Wiz and Cluck et al will never have my respect; because they have stopped supporting the side in order to get at the board. Wrong, IMO.

I''ll be there: City til I die and all that, regardless of how bad it gets...

Actually Dave Jones would come here as we can pay more money.

Actually someone on the official site said exactly the same.

It''s Etuhu we''re missing. Fact is the middle of the park needed his presence yesterday.

Yes, because of the News of the World and it''s sister paper (the Sun) have been so right recently, haven''t they?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internationals/7055135.stm

I''d have Pulis in a heart beat. He has the experience we need, an impressive record and has really done well with the teams he''s been in. He''s built good, strong sides. Yes, he can play some unattractive football but frankly we don''t have the luxury of disgarding a candidate who ticks so many other boxes.

[quote user="David Knights"]Why all the negatives about Glen Hoodle - he has a track record - more so than the previos manager [/quote]I think, David, the worry concerning Hoddle is that his heart wouldn''t be in it and his man management skills are atrocious! We need someone capable of building a destroyed team spirit and individual''s confidence. I personally think there would be worse appointments than Hoddle; but equally I think there are far, far better out there.

[quote user="we8wba"] lets keep this norwich based, i got 1st hand opinion on twoddle n his dire football ask any wolves fan and theyll tell you the same, you''ll find it hard to hear a true wolves fan (whos not armchair supporter) to say twoddle was good as wolves board - i think you''ll find the only board which poor hasnt been in helm for last 20yrs, sir jack put in 60m into the team, n morgan has so far provided funds the boards has never signed a player for us unlike yours whos obv bought in hartson you can get all angry n defensive but lets face it mate our board n manager better than yours in the last few years (not saying that wont change though) [/quote]You''re making vast and stupid assumptions.I didn''t question your experiences or opinions with Hoddle, nor did I question his achievements at Wolves. Hoddle was, without a doubt, not the right man for Wolves and that''s why they got rid. Nor did I question about how much your board put in.Our board has not "bought in" Hartson; that was obviously something Grant had started that Duffy sanctioned in his role as caretaker. And frankly I agree with the move. IMO, Hartson is a far better player than Boothroyd.Further, our board and manager in the last few years have taken us to the Premiership. And then gotten us into this mess. It''s a game of change as you rightly say and I think on the balance of things, it''d be hard to argue the superiority of either side in such terms. We''ve both been disappointing, to say the least.My point, however, stands. You cannot comment on being linked with poor managers. Even when Mick was appointed you were being linked with poor managers and prior to that, have hired poor managers. You are being a smug, hypocritical numpty. You''re welcome to post here, but don''t go lording over us as you are now. Frankly, you''re being a bit of a prat; and I''m sure my fellow Canaries here would agree. So stop acting like a nonce or leave this board.