Jump to content
Note to existing users - password reset is required Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Mervmeister

Norwich, Chelsea, man city after Fraser Forster?

Recommended Posts

http://app.tribalfootball.com/?referrer=http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/norwich-chelsea-man-city-go-celtic-keeper-forster-3967840#article/tribalfootball-3967840

No idea if anything in it.

Would we rather Chelsea directly went for hooper or would we be happier to let ruddy go and get Forster possibly slightly cheaper making small profit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to some press reports this morning, Cheski''s "improved" bid for Ruddy was £6M  - are they taking the pi55???

If I was Ruddy, I''d feel insulted!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Foghorn"]

According to some press reports this morning, Cheski''s "improved" bid for Ruddy was £6M  - are they taking the pi55???

If I was Ruddy, I''d feel insulted!!

[/quote]We should not be taking less than 12 million IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forster better than Ruddy?? I have to disagree he''s a good keeper but he''s not better than Ruddy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Think Forster is at least as good as Ruddy.

Let''s hope we don''t let Ruddy go before a replacement is lined up.

We''ve just done the same with Holt - sold before a replacement is signed - we now need two or three strikers and other clubs know that. Look what happened last season when we loaned Vaughan without a replacement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two or three? We already have two, if CH plays one up front and gets more offensive players in the mould of Toivonen then we only need one other striker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forster would be my choice replacement, but he is not better than ruddy.

We will struggle to find a keeper better than him, fact, but forster has the potential to rival him at international level.

We mustbdo everything to hold onto ruddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Forster would be a better fit for Chelsea than Ruddy.

He''s equally as promising, probably wouldn''t mind being sat on the bench a bit and has a few more years on his side.

I reckon they''d get him for £5m too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="paul moy"]A no brainer. Forster is better than Ruddy but we must get him before we sell !!!!
[/quote]

 

No surprise here. Still clueless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="jedi"]Forster better than Ruddy?? I have to disagree he''s a good keeper but he''s not better than Ruddy.[/quote]

This^^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jedi wrote:

Forster better than Ruddy?? I have to disagree he''s a good keeper but he''s not better than Ruddy.

yep, I agree with the above too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×