EFL TV money

[essex canary 497]

The attached is interesting plus goes on to say that Clubs receive £75,000 for each televised game.

[A Load of Squit 5,189]

In what way is it interesting?

[TIL 1010 4,767]

Is this not part of the new deal struck eleven months ago in May 2023 so why bring it up now as previous TV income and EFL payments show in the accounts ?

[Well b back 3,239]

FFS

[Mello Yello 2,297]

£75,000 for a televised game?....That'll probably just about cover an average team an' klingon's weekend away game costs.....

  plus  

 

 

and not forgetting.......Oh....an' some other stuff....

...."Chin up!"...."and now the other one two"..... 

Edited April 17 by Mello Yello

[......and Smith must score. 1,349]

1 hour ago, A Load of Squit said:

In what way is it interesting?

If you're an obsessive accountant like Kevin anything concerning money is pretty orgasmic.

[NewNestCarrow 202]

2 hours ago, essex canary said:

The attached is interesting plus goes on to say that Clubs receive £75,000 for each televised game.

 

It is widely reported that the Home side gets a substantially bigger fee for live games than the visitors, so your Sunderland Echo figure ("£75,000 to both home & away") is unlikely to be accurate.

If you had looked at the 2018/19 accounts you would have seen that Non-PL tv income was around £8.4m.

From August 2024 the new EFL tv deal is "a 50% increase on the value of the current rights agreement", but the split of cash among the clubs is unlikely to guarantee that all will benefit to the same percentage.

[Badger 2,407]

2 hours ago, ......and Smith must score. said:

If you're an obsessive accountant like Kevin anything concerning money is pretty orgasmic.

I think that football finance is very interesting too - but point made by the OP is not "news."

[essex canary 497]

On 17/04/2024 at 13:01, NewNestCarrow said:

It is widely reported that the Home side gets a substantially bigger fee for live games than the visitors, so your Sunderland Echo figure ("£75,000 to both home & away") is unlikely to be accurate.

If you had looked at the 2018/19 accounts you would have seen that Non-PL tv income was around £8.4m.

From August 2024 the new EFL tv deal is "a 50% increase on the value of the current rights agreement", but the split of cash among the clubs is unlikely to guarantee that all will benefit to the same percentage.

Not sure where you get your 2018/19 figure from since the entry in that year's accounts (from doubtless a slightly lower price base) was £9.351 million.

It would be interesting to know how the new EFL shakes down relative to the loss of Canaries TV.

[NewNestCarrow 202]

35 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Not sure where you get your 2018/19 figure from since the entry in that year's accounts (from doubtless a slightly lower price base) was £9.351 million.

It would be interesting to know how the new EFL shakes down relative to the loss of Canaries TV.

£8.4m (base sum) + live games fees = £9.351m

My point was that the figure for non-PL tv income is hardly newsworthy.

[TIL 1010 4,767]

58 minutes ago, NewNestCarrow said:

 

My point was that the figure for non-PL tv income is hardly newsworthy.

Unless of course you have an agenda to pursue.

[essex canary 497]

58 minutes ago, TIL 1010 said:

Unless of course you have an agenda to pursue.

With 60% of Championship matches on Sky next season, more people may decide to watch at home.

[JonnyJonnyRowe 451]

On 17/04/2024 at 13:01, NewNestCarrow said:

It is widely reported that the Home side gets a substantially bigger fee for live games than the visitors, so your Sunderland Echo figure ("£75,000 to both home & away") is unlikely to be accurate.

If you had looked at the 2018/19 accounts you would have seen that Non-PL tv income was around £8.4m.

From August 2024 the new EFL tv deal is "a 50% increase on the value of the current rights agreement", but the split of cash among the clubs is unlikely to guarantee that all will benefit to the same percentage.

I've just tried to verify this figure and £75000 is actually the fee that Rugby Championship clubs will get next year from the broadcaster Premier Sports to screen rugby games. I think Essex Canary and/or Sunderland Echo might have their wires crossed completely.

Edited April 19 by JonnyJonnyRowe

[NewNestCarrow 202]

1 hour ago, JonnyJonnyRowe said:

I've just tried to verify this figure and £75000 is actually the fee that Rugby Championship clubs will get next year from the broadcaster Premier Sports to screen rugby games. I think Essex Canary and/or Sunderland Echo might have their wires crossed completely.

Forever trying to fit a square argument into a round hole

[If wed kept Howie.. 208]

On 17/04/2024 at 09:48, essex canary said:

The attached is interesting plus goes on to say that Clubs receive £75,000 for each televised game.

the only thing interesting is the shocking standard of writing..

[essex canary 497]

2 hours ago, JonnyJonnyRowe said:

I've just tried to verify this figure and £75000 is actually the fee that Rugby Championship clubs will get next year from the broadcaster Premier Sports to screen rugby games. I think Essex Canary and/or Sunderland Echo might have their wires crossed completely.

It is of little consequence since it is clear that revenue from existing EFL contracts works out at around £1 million per year for a Clubs such as NCFC and Sunderland.

[JonnyJonnyRowe 451]

1 hour ago, essex canary said:

It is of little consequence since it is clear that revenue from existing EFL contracts works out at around £1 million per year for a Clubs such as NCFC and Sunderland.

Do I need to explain that Rugby and Football are different sports Essex?

[essex canary 497]

23 minutes ago, JonnyJonnyRowe said:

Do I need to explain that Rugby and Football are different sports Essex?

I know nothing about the finances of Rugby other than that some of their Clubs that have gone bust recently have done so with far more modest debt than NCFC currently have.

[TIL 1010 4,767]

3 hours ago, essex canary said:

I know nothing about the finances of Rugby other than that some of their Clubs that have gone bust recently have done so with far more modest debt than NCFC currently have.

Have we external debt then that could cause us to go bust ?

Edited April 19 by TIL 1010

[essex canary 497]

4 hours ago, TIL 1010 said:

Have we external debt then that could cause us to go bust ?

Put it this way. The Government - daft though they are - want to see viable going concern sports clubs. Following the demise of Rugby Club's such as Worcester (probably equivalent to the likes of Peterborough in football terms) the DCMS will be in high alert which is doubtless why the EFL is taking an eternity re our approval.