Monty13 2,235 Posted March 3, 2015 Just cringing at my grammar mistakes, it''s 2015, where the f@ck is the edit button! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maccys Back 0 Posted March 3, 2015 "Sorry officer my speedo says I''m only doinng 30" officer says A "it''s ok ive never heard that one before on your way son" or B "tough sh1t it''s your job to ensure it is working" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maccys Back 0 Posted March 3, 2015 With what''s on the news today and with Rotherham I find it truly shocking that people could even talk about "mitigating" circumstances. I wonder had their daughter been "shared" round a group of older men or even their son''s would they be so accommodating to these same mitigating circumstances? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Angry 1,570 Posted March 3, 2015 Any male who has sex with a girl under 16 has broken the law and if they are charged I would expect them to be found guilty. The circumstances which lead to them having sex are only relevant in determining the sentence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted March 3, 2015 [quote user="Maccys Back"]An escort for a dog? Wow nice to know where my tax money goes, I must remember that enlightening story next time the police are moaning about the force being cut in half under this tory government[/quote][:D] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barbe bleu 829 Posted March 3, 2015 11 pages of earnest discussion about the law and no one has thought of looking at what the law actually says?The sexual offences Act 2003 is really quite sensible. Take a look at it and the associated CPS guidance and you''ll probably all agree with it and each other.Which would make a change.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katie Borkins 1 Posted March 3, 2015 [quote user="lake district canary"][quote user="Maccys Back"]Changing?? No its fine as it is dumbass, is she 16? No then off to jail you go! Its as simple as it gets. You can''t go drink driving and say "well I wasn''t speeding" can you. I can''t believe how difficult some find this law.[/quote]Mitigating circumstances can be real and meaningful in all sorts of situations. Drink driving and speeding are two of them. I got stopped last year on the way to the vets with my dog who had cut her paw and I was hurrying, not drastically, but over the speed limit. Far from getting a ticket, I got a police escort to the vets. [/quote]That''s sorted then, I''m taking an injured dog with me the next time I go out nightclubbing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted March 3, 2015 But if a chap, like Lakey''s dog, could lick it''s own balls then there would be no need to go to a nightclub to meet complicit women below the age of consent.So Indy. You expect club doormen to extract evidence of a patron''s age but not the person who subsequently engages in intercourse with them? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,554 Posted March 3, 2015 The person who subsequently engages in intercourse with them is a victim of the parents and doorman''s wrong doing. I think that''s how it works anyway.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted March 3, 2015 But what age is the dog? Does the law count dog years, or human years? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted March 3, 2015 I bet Lakey''s dog is a cross between a Bull Terrier and a ShihTzu. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katie Borkins 1 Posted March 3, 2015 If I shagged an underage bird then I would blame the booze, the bouncers what let her in, the Bird for dolling herself up all fancy like, putting on slap and that to entice me, and her parents for not raising her right.Never mind jail, i''d f**king well sue the lot of them for making me an accidental paedo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
STFU 0 Posted March 3, 2015 I wouldn''t count on it Barbe bleu, seem to be quite a lot of misogynistic points of view on this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,554 Posted March 3, 2015 There are STFU but people with those views are only stating them. And then we''re discussing them. I know what my views are but I''m quite happy for others to put theirs forward. What''s your problem with it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tony Cottee Woz Ere . . . 0 Posted March 3, 2015 I''ve yet to see one misogynist view. All I see are some people of rational mind who live in the real world and understand basic human behaviour. And some who don''t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katie Borkins 1 Posted March 4, 2015 Perhaps the reason we have laws, values and cultural norms is to mitigate "basic human nature". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Not Born Just Bred 0 Posted March 4, 2015 [quote user="Mr Angry"]Any male who has sex with a girl under 16 has broken the law and if they are charged I would expect them to be found guilty. The circumstances which lead to them having sex are only relevant in determining the sentence.[/quote]At last Mr Angry I agree with someone, and that punishment could be a slap on the wris to a lengthy prison sentance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Not Born Just Bred 0 Posted March 4, 2015 [quote user="Mr Angry"]Any male who has sex with a girl under 16 has broken the law and if they are charged I would expect them to be found guilty. The circumstances which lead to them having sex are only relevant in determining the sentence.[/quote]At last Mr Angry I agree with someone, and that punishment could be a slap on the wris to a lengthy prison sentance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites