king canary

I was at that game and to be honest it sounds a bit like you saw what you wanted to see.

As suspected the standard memberships have been rendered a complete waste looking at those numbers.

Eh? Wasn't that game his first one back from injury and he played for 120 minutes?

Real kit revealed and it won't have a sponsors logo on it. I think I'd take being a 48 hour publicity stunt in exchange for a sponsor free shirt.

Clearly. We wouldn't have gone up if he hadn't scored that 4th against Wednesday or something...

It's Passlack all over again.

There is no way Arsenal are letting a 21 year old international coming off a good season go for £3m.

Palmer is one of those players I’ve heard lots of hype over but has throughly underwhelmed whenever I’ve actually watched him.

Not sure there is a more pointless piece of clothing than the tie at this point in time. Weddings or funerals are the only times I'm wearing one.

Lots of confusing reports with regards to Bielek. It seems Arsenal got badly burnt by the Sanchez/Ozil situation and now don't want to let players get to the final year of their deal and forced to sell at a cut price. So I think they want him to sign a new deal and maybe go out on loan again but if he really doesn't want to extend then they may look to sell now when they can get a bigger fee. I'm not sure why he's being linked with Championship clubs on loan based on that though. I can't imagine he is that interested in signing a new deal to go out to a second tier club.

Only if he plays regularly I guess.

More of a central defender at this point I think.

On the DM subject I'd love us to go in for Matt Grimes from Swansea.

Expectations are low for him so basically if he doesn't come on and **** the bed we're happy. Birmingham is the only time I can remember him making a tangible impact last season- he was just as likely to come on and make zero impact as he was to do anything useful. Such is the life of a perma sub I guess but let's not pretend he has done all that much.

Those are some low, low expectations. And this is some heavy abuse of the word literally.

Oh god I hated them- so cringe, I just felt sorry for a guy desperately trying to be famous off the fact his wife shagged his brother.

He's fine as a third/fourth choice to chuck on for the odd 10 minutes here or there but I really don't see anything more from him.

I wouldn't worry about that, I can't imagine many on this thread are dying to try it out...

God you're weird. Most restaurants offer vegetarian options because it is commercially sensible. Enough of the population is vegetarian that catering for them makes sense as they'll often get mixed groups of meat eaters and vegetarians. Vegetarian restaurants don't offer meat options because there is enough of a market of vegetarians who would prefer to eat in a restaurant that is free of meat. It isn't about being intolerant, it is about what makes commerical sense. If there was a demand for restaurants that didn't serve veggie or vegan options they'd exist. People who like you who enjoy being **** for the sake of it are in a small enough minority that they don't need catering for. I'd imagine your veggie friends probably don't enjoy going out for dinner with you that much.

Got to hand it PP they know how to get attention.

I don't know because I'm not a weirdo who doesn't check people are OK with the menu before booking somewhere to eat...

I don't know what kind of vegetarians you know (I'm leaning towards 'imaginary ones' at this point) but every time I've been out for dinner with a mixed group the vegetarians have never been in 'uproar' about going to a restaurant that serves meat as long as there are decent vegetarian options.

Exactly. This is like the people who ask why there aren't any 'straight bars.'

Think it was the infamous January under Neil when we spent bucket loads on quite a bit of crap.