Team News

[morty 0]

Holt, Becchio AND Hoolahoop start.Shove that in your poop pipe, negative ninnies![;)]

[BroadstairsR 2,201]

[quote user="morty"]Holt, Becchio AND Hoolahoop start.

Shove that in your poop pipe, negative ninnies!

[;)]
[/quote]

 

and Howson, according to Stelling just now.

[morty 0]

[quote user="BroadstairsR"]

[quote user="morty"]Holt, Becchio AND Hoolahoop start.Shove that in your poop pipe, negative ninnies![;)][/quote]

 

and Howson, according to Stelling just now.

[/quote]Yeah Tettey didn''t make it.Could this be the return of the diamond?Interesting.

[star_manic 0]

a real change in personnel, and looks like tactics as well. very interesting team, looking forward to this.

[technika 0]

if its 442 and hoolahans on the left garrido is going to have a very busy afternoon

[morty 0]

It will be interesting if we lose what the people who were calling for two up front, will say on here later.

[Mister Chops 7]

Norwich City

• 28 Bunn
• 02 R Martin
• 05 Bassong
• 06 Turner
• 18 Garrido
• 04 Johnson
• 07 Snodgrass
• 08 Howson
• 14 Hoolahan
• 09 Holt
• 19 Becchio

Substitutes

• 42 Camp
• 03 Whittaker
• 24 R Bennett
• 12 Pilkington
• 15 Fox
• 17 E Bennett
• 16 Kamara

I don''t see a lot of width in that starting XI, which may be good news for Leighton Baines in a marauding/counter attacking left back role.  On the plus side, attacking intent all through that City team.  Perhaps Martin and Garrido will get forward to provide width.

[morty 0]

[quote user="technika"]if its 442 and hoolahans on the left garrido is going to have a very busy afternoon[/quote]Everton are very strong down the left, it would be suicide to play Hoolahan there lol.

[Mister Chops 7]

[quote user="morty"]It will be interesting if we lose what the people who were calling for two up front, will say on here later.

[/quote]I think it will be less interesting and more predictable...

[morty 0]

Best I get my jacket on and get there!

[technika 0]

[quote user="morty"]It will be interesting if we lose what the people who were calling for two up front, will say on here later.

[/quote]

for me he should be playing with two wingers as well, still dont know why he cant play snodgrass on the left and bennet on the right

can play 5 up front but it doesnt matter if they are sat deep and sent out to draw

[technika 0]

[quote user="morty"][quote user="technika"]if its 442 and hoolahans on the left garrido is going to have a very busy afternoon[/quote]Everton are very strong down the left, it would be suicide to play Hoolahan there lol.[/quote]

if hoolahan was on the left he would be playing against evertons right ;)

[morty 0]

[quote user="technika"][quote user="morty"][quote user="technika"]if its 442 and hoolahans on the left garrido is going to have a very busy afternoon[/quote]Everton are very strong down the left, it would be suicide to play Hoolahan there lol.[/quote]

if hoolahan was on the left he would be playing against evertons right ;)[/quote]Lol[:$]

[pete 320]

If Wes on our left will be up against Everton right side therefore not so much too worry but still worry about it.

[NorwichNorth 0]

Cant see CH play the diamond or anything other than 442. I think he will play wes left side. Not confident that it will work but we shall see!

[Highland Canary 76]

Yo -looks like we''re going to try and win today! And a 3G signal too!

[technika 0]

like i said garrido is in for a long afternoon if wes is in front of him, apart from the fact he will wander hes also proven many times in the past he doesnt really get the positioning & chasing back needed out there

really dont understand why a left footed player (snodgrass) cant be played there, we have right wingers, bennet would cope with baines pace as well

should drop hoolahan to the bench and bring him on if its going wrong, change of formation and a plan B

[First Wizard 0]

[quote user="star_manic"]a real change in personnel, and looks like tactics as well. very interesting team, looking forward to this.
[/quote]

 

This seems positive.[Y]

[the bristol nest 0]

I am pleased to see a home selection but worry that a simple 442 may leave us light on Wes''s side. Let''s hope that this resembles a less predictable system with Holt maybe providing extra cover if not the diamond.

Can''t moan though as I for one was wanting to freshen things up. Typical that boredom gets replaced by anxiety!

[lincoln canary (& Golden Coppel) 0]

We''re playing all 4 ex Leeds players. Couldn''t win league one, couldn''t get promoted from the championship and now all starting for a club who had players he did both but now deemed not good enough. Strange hey.

[Highland Canary 76]

some positivity and a victory:-)) if only we''d have tried this against Newcastle we wouldn''t have found ourselves in such a predicament.

[Mister Chops 7]

[quote user="Highland Canary"]some positivity and a victory:-)) if only we''d have tried this against Newcastle we wouldn''t have found ourselves in such a predicament.[/quote]If you consider Becchio and Kei Kamara weren''t here when we played Newcastle United, you might have some idea of why we didn''t try this against Newcastle United.

[Highland Canary 76]

Clearly, the personnel are different but the tactics needn''t have been in my opinion.

[morty 0]

[quote user="Highland Canary"]Clearly, the personnel are different but the tactics needn''t have been in my opinion.[/quote]Rubbish.We didn''t have two good enough strikers to play, thats the point.

[Bill 1,788]

[quote user="Highland Canary"]some positivity and a victory:-)) if only we''d have tried this against Newcastle we wouldn''t have found ourselves in such a predicament.[/quote]

 

what predicament ?

 

bar having whingers like you claiming that we would finish in the bottom three

 

somewhere we have not be in since early Octber (20 games ago) - nor been near there since either