is it time to listen?

[The gut 0]

Now that we are undisputedly top of the division, perhaps we should listen to all the posters who want half the team dropped, Hoolahan, Russell and Doc sold, and the diamond scrapped. After all we don''t want to be predictable and complacent so maybe a skake up and change of strategy is what we need to stay top.[;)]

[The gut 0]

What about electing to go into administration, that might also be a good idea now that we''d be unlikely to get relegated after a points deduction.[;)]

[Smudger 0]

Maybe if we had of seen a shake up by now then we could of had Automatic Promotion and still gone in to administration before the mid March cut off point??? [:^)]

[ZLF 334]

Its an option I guess but does feel wrong - perhaps the rules should be changed so you cant get promoted if going into admin, otherwise you could spend the earth in getting a good squad then start again in the summer once promoted.  Just does not appeal to my sense of fair play.

And how does going into admin work? Would we have to realise the value of some of our assets,  so would we be forced to sell to satisfy some debts?  No point getting promoted and losing Smith, Holt, Hoolahan or Martin or leasing back FCR is there?  

[whoareyou? 0]

You don''t ''elect'' to go into administration, it''s a situation forced on a company when they can no longer pay their creditors!

It''s not something done lightly either as it effects your long term credit availability and worthiness.

[Messiah 0]

You lot talk a load of pants!

1. Bring back Gunny and Grant in a joint managerial partnership.
2. Roeder as mis-director of football.
3. Start playing a 2-1-5-1-1 formation with the ball punted straight down the middle evertime - the theory being that at some point the oppsition will think that we must boot it somewhere else other than the middle.
4. Theo as new goalie coach.
5. Nick Leeson as Chairman.

What could possibly go wrong?[:P]

[Matt Morriss 69]

Anyone who suggests a ''shake up'', or dropping of certain players, is 100% an absolute fool, doesnt know their football and doesnt know Norwich City.Thankfully Lambert does, and thats why were top of the league and were going to win the title by a long distance.

[Lambert is King 0]

Well said Barclay and the same for going into administration - those talking about it do not understand. All of our debts that can be repaid still have to by the sale of any assets.Those with secured loans on the ground will be given the ground or force a sale. Lambert would probably leave.

As far as the team goes in Lambert we trust - anyone wishing to object to his face can go to the question and answer session in March with him McNally and some of the players

[The gut 0]

whoareyou? wrote the following post at 17/02/2010 8:04 AM:

You don''t ''elect'' to go into administration, it''s a situation forced on a company when they can no longer pay their creditors!

It''s not something done lightly either as it effects your long term credit availability and worthiness.

a little pedantic youare

[The gut 0]

[quote user="Smudger"]Maybe if we had of seen a shake up by now then we could of had Automatic Promotion and still gone in to administration before the mid March cut off point??? [:^)]
[/quote]

only you smudger could come out with that and probably believe it beyond any doubt

[The gut 0]

[quote user="Barclayman"]Anyone who suggests a ''shake up'', or dropping of certain players, is 100% an absolute fool, doesnt know their football and doesnt know Norwich City.

Thankfully Lambert does, and thats why were top of the league and were going to win the title by a long distance.
[/quote]

eggszackerly

[Indy_Bones 444]

[quote user="Messiah"]Roeder as mis-director of football.[/quote]That''s not as daft as it might sound.Roeder often had a good eye for talent and potential, and clearly had some decent contacts in the prem, the problem was that he struggled to manage the players when they got here.I''m not saying we should even consider however, and although I don''t agree with the DOF idea in general, I have to say that Roeder might do well in the role.

[Jack Barak 46]

[quote user="Messiah"]You lot talk a load of pants!

1. Bring back Gunny and Grant in a joint managerial partnership.
2. Roeder as mis-director of football.
3. Start playing a 2-1-5-1-1 formation with the ball punted straight down the middle evertime - the theory being that at some point the oppsition will think that we must boot it somewhere else other than the middle.
4. Theo as new goalie coach.
5. Nick Leeson as Chairman.

What could possibly go wrong?[:P][/quote]Not a bad idea at all, but we will need to move quickly...I saw a guy who once spoke to Peter Grant in Asda and he was sure Ipswich were looking to implement this very plan! Come on Delia, pull your finger out.

[Smudger 0]

Gap down to 3 points... 3 points out of the last 9... poor in many other games this year... maybe it is time you started to listen??? [:^)]

[NorwichRat 4]

Smudger you are a complete a***e.

You post so much on here so you can say at some point " i tould you so". Everybody knows that 9 times out of time we can all say"smudger you was wrong".

We are top of the league on merit. We have been there only a few weeks.

No side can win them all, look what happened to Leeds this year.

Go support another team. You might think your passionate but your just an arrogant fool looking for the limelight behind your keyboard.