Iwan is God 0 Posted October 16, 2009 Anoyone know who the un named injury doubt is? As PL is refusing to name the player I can only assume its one of our most influential players... Hoolahan or Holt perhaps? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canary cherub 1 Posted October 16, 2009 That''s what I thought too . . . unless it''s mind games to keep Leeds guessing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted October 17, 2009 [quote user="Iwan is God"]Anoyone know who the un named injury doubt is? As PL is refusing to name the player I can only assume its one of our most influential players... Hoolahan or Holt perhaps?[/quote]Its Holt.......I know it............waits for post to vanish again![:|] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted October 17, 2009 Its are key man.... Jamie Cureton :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bovril 264 Posted October 18, 2009 they''re are strong rumours it is indeed Grant Holt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
G 0 Posted October 18, 2009 [quote user="The Lord"]they''re are strong rumours it is indeed Grant Holt[/quote]Jesus, just when we need him most, i am a little confused at why Lambert didn''t give any names. Leeds have a few injuries though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
G 0 Posted October 18, 2009 <BLOCKQUOTE><table width="85%"><tr><td class="txt4"><img src="/cs_pinkun/cs/Themes/default/images/icon-quote.gif"> <strong>The Lord wrote:</strong></td></tr><tr><td class="quoteTable"><table width="100%"><tr><td width="100%" valign="top" class="txt4">they''re are strong rumours it is indeed Grant Holt<br></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE> Jesus, just when we need him most, i am a little confused at why Lambert didn''t give any names. Leeds have a few injuries though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted October 18, 2009 holt had a shin injury last week and was struggling a little. If he doesnt play tomorrow it will be a shame but we do have a good "team" and other options, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lambo 0 Posted October 18, 2009 I''d rather have Hoolahan than Holt, as much as I love Holt but I think Hoolahan, Martin then one of Cody or Jamie would see us through rather than Holt but with no Hoolahan pulling the strings.Could also be Rusty??? I beleive he was carrying a knock last week also. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Bump 0 Posted October 18, 2009 You could say it is a bad time to play Leeds with Holt potentially out but they''re also missing Becchio and Snodgrass Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
O.T.B.C 1 Posted October 18, 2009 There is no one who can replace Holt and that is a worry for the whole season. I suppose we could use Martin or Maric, if he is fit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 10,762 Posted October 18, 2009 [quote user="Mr. Bump"]You could say it is a bad time to play Leeds with Holt potentially out but they''re also missing Becchio and Snodgrass[/quote]Now if Doc can give Beckford a good kick in the shins 5 minutes into the game, we should be sorted! [:D] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Woman in the Stands (WITS) 0 Posted October 18, 2009 [quote user="Lambo"]I''d rather have Hoolahan than Holt, as much as I love Holt but I think Hoolahan, Martin then one of Cody or Jamie would see us through rather than Holt but with no Hoolahan pulling the strings.Could also be Rusty??? I beleive he was carrying a knock last week also.[/quote]That''s ok providing the rest of the team don''t forget they haven''t got a target man, if it''s Holt who''s injured, for all those high balls they could hoof up front, like they did at Priestfield for the JPT. What a waste of time that was. Hoolahan, Martin & Cody need the ball to feet for their best playing opportunites. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites