Membership Details For Next Season 2024/25.

[TIL 1010 4,776]

https://www.canaries.co.uk/content/memberships-on-sale-for-2024-25

I  cannot see any changes whatsoever from this season.

How long before you know who shows his face on here to have one of his favourite whinges ?

[Robert N. LiM 4,432]

I don't recall this last year but maybe I'm misremembering.

Quote

In addition, non-adult season ticket holders will be able to purchase a top-up membership for £15, which entitles them to access for away tickets, and the further benefits of a being a member.

Not entirely sure why that benefit is only available to non-adults.

[......and Smith must score. 1,349]

2 hours ago, TIL 1010 said:

https://www.canaries.co.uk/content/memberships-on-sale-for-2024-25

I  cannot see any changes whatsoever from this season.

How long before you know who shows his face on here to have one of his favourite whinges ?

No that can’t be right Tilly……..Kevin said ‘ toodle pip ‘ on Easter Sunday didn’t he ?

[Greavsy 2,418]

1 hour ago, ......and Smith must score. said:

No that can’t be right Tilly……..Kevin said ‘ toodle pip ‘ on Easter Sunday didn’t he ?

Hes not the first person to make a return over the Easter period............

[Google Bot 3,298]

1 hour ago, Greavsy said:

Hes not the first person to make a return over the Easter period............

Did this other person have holes in their palms from gripping money too tight, too?

[Greavsy 2,418]

7 minutes ago, Google Bot said:

Did this other person have holes in their palms from gripping money too tight, too?

Good shot sir.

I salute you. 🫡 

[GMF 756]

16 minutes ago, Google Bot said:

Did this other person have holes in their palms from gripping money too tight, too?

⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

Nailed it… 

[Greavsy 2,418]

Turns water into whine........

[essex canary 504]

Aside from the points that have been made many times, shouldn't shareholder entitlements be made clear in this announcement otherwise there is a risk of purchase when unnecessary?

[Yobocop 1,105]

17 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Aside from the points that have been made many times, shouldn't shareholder entitlements be made clear in this announcement otherwise there is a risk of purchase when unnecessary?

I genuinely have got no idea what you are talking about on any of your messages on this forum. 

the amount of b0llocks you talk is quite something 

[Greavsy 2,418]

6 hours ago, essex canary said:

Aside from the points that have been made many times, shouldn't shareholder entitlements be made clear in this announcement otherwise there is a risk of purchase when unnecessary?

Entitlement sums it up well..........

[essex canary 504]

8 hours ago, Yobocop said:

I genuinely have got no idea what you are talking about on any of your messages on this forum. 

the amount of b0llocks you talk is quite something 

The Articles of Association- the Club's Bible - entitles shareholders to free membership.

Edited April 5 by essex canary

[essex canary 504]

Priority for a play-off Semi Final could go to someone who has attended NIL matches over the past 2 years but has simply paid the Club a one-off £25. Maybe that is their intention for the Final too albeit there is then a fresh opportunity to pay £25. If Leeds ran such a scheme Wembley would need a capacity in the millions.

[......and Smith must score. 1,349]

9 hours ago, essex canary said:

Aside from the points that have been made many times, shouldn't shareholder entitlements be made clear in this announcement otherwise there is a risk of purchase when unnecessary?

Hello ? 

Kevin said he was signing off. Are accountants dishonest ?
 

 

[......and Smith must score. 1,349]

9 hours ago, essex canary said:

Aside from the points that have been made many times, shouldn't shareholder entitlements be made clear in this announcement otherwise there is a risk of purchase when unnecessary?

I’m sure someone who’s been awash with entitlements for over 20 years wouldn’t begrudge the odd £25 to slip back under the radar.

[essex canary 504]

15 minutes ago, ......and Smith must score. said:

Hello ? 

Kevin said he was signing off. Are accountants dishonest ?
 

 

Is 'Toodle Pip' in the Oxford English Dictionary?

[king canary 7,644]

Interesting that those purchasing now would also be able to get a play-off final ticket if we got there. 

[GMF 756]

2 hours ago, essex canary said:

Is 'Toodle Pip' in the Oxford English Dictionary?

Actually, yes.

Toodle-pip. Originates circa 2002, a verb, 1. to ramble, incessantly, often with an overwhelming sense of entitlement. 2. to say something that one has no intention of doing.

Edited April 5 by GMF

[GMF 756]

3 minutes ago, king canary said:

Interesting that those purchasing now would also be able to get a play-off final ticket if we got there. 

If memory serves me correctly, for the last play-off final, the first round of sales was for season ticket holders, then members. There was then a second round of sales, again for season ticket holders and members, who could buy additional tickets. There were no general sales in 2015.

[Greavsy 2,418]

1 hour ago, GMF said:

Actually, yes.

Tootle-pip. Originates circa 2002, a verb, 1. to ramble, incessantly, often with an overwhelming sense of entitlement. 2. to say something that one has no intention of doing.

3. The gift that keeps taking.................

[essex canary 504]

2 hours ago, GMF said:

Actually, yes.

Toodle-pip. Originates circa 2002, a verb, 1. to ramble, incessantly, often with an overwhelming sense of entitlement. 2. to say something that one has no intention of doing.

Perhaps try 'full free'. The original concept of course being that shareholders are 'ultimate members' therefore cannot be members twice.

As junior members can't be shareholders it must also be a mockery to be charging them £15 for the right to attend away matches. Why not invest in the Supporters of the future?

[essex canary 504]

2 hours ago, GMF said:

If memory serves me correctly, for the last play-off final, the first round of sales was for season ticket holders, then members. There was then a second round of sales, again for season ticket holders and members, who could buy additional tickets. There were no general sales in 2015.

So where is the consultation process this time round? Is it not the case that existing ST holders and current year members could potentially exhaust the allocation thereby leaving no scope for an 'opportunity to purchase' based on a 2024/25 membership?

[GMF 756]

2 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Perhaps try 'full free'. The original concept of course being that shareholders are 'ultimate members' therefore cannot be members twice.

As junior members can't be shareholders it must also be a mockery to be charging them £15 for the right to attend away matches. Why not invest in the Supporters of the future?

Full free?

Actually, under 16’s can be shareholders (there’s numerous examples in the shareholders register) however, they are listed under the name of the parent, with a/c of with the juniors name.

[GMF 756]

6 minutes ago, essex canary said:

So where is the consultation process this time round? Is it not the case that existing ST holders and current year members could potentially exhaust the allocation thereby leaving no scope for an 'opportunity to purchase' based on a 2024/25 membership?

You’re the accountant, you do the sums for yourself!

Hint - the answer is No! 

[essex canary 504]

6 minutes ago, GMF said:

Full free?

Actually, under 16’s can be shareholders (there’s numerous examples in the shareholders register) however, they are listed under the name of the parent, with a/c of with the juniors name.

So therefore, presumably, under Article 8 of the Articles of Association (appended to my earlier posting) any such junior, like any shareholder adult, is entitled to free full membership of the Football Club and doesn't have to pay an extra £15 for the right to attend away matches? £25 in the adult case.

[essex canary 504]

5 minutes ago, GMF said:

You’re the accountant, you do the sums for yourself!

Hint - the answer is No! 

The match allocation seems to be around 37,000, sometimes nearer 36,000. Given our marketing material claims 22,000 shareholders and 14,000 members the available headroom must be very low.

[GMF 756]

3 minutes ago, essex canary said:

So therefore, presumably, under Article 8 of the Articles of Association (appended to my earlier posting) any such junior, like any shareholder adult, is entitled to free full membership of the Football Club and doesn't have to pay an extra £15 for the right to attend away matches? £25 in the adult case.

My memory isn’t as good as it used to be, but I’m sure that this point was tested somewhere before? And you lost? 

[TIL 1010 4,776]

18 minutes ago, essex canary said:

 

As junior members can't be shareholders it must also be a mockery to be charging them £15 for the right to attend away matches. 

You have been banging on about the membership was not needed as apart from Scum away tickets went to general sale but now all of a sudden it appears it will cost them £15 for the right to attend away games so which is it, needed or not needed ?

[GMF 756]

1 minute ago, essex canary said:

The match allocation seems to be around 37,000, sometimes nearer 36,000. Given our marketing material claims 22,000 shareholders and 14,000 members the available headroom must be very low.

Season ticket holders, presumably?

You’re double counting with your 14,000 members. The figure includes season ticket holders with away memberships, plus members who hold both home and away membership, so, no, there’s plenty of headroom. 

[essex canary 504]

36 minutes ago, GMF said:

Season ticket holders, presumably?

You’re double counting with your 14,000 members. The figure includes season ticket holders with away memberships, plus members who hold both home and away membership, so, no, there’s plenty of headroom. 

Of course there is double counting. Shareholder Members are doubtless not being counted at all and I suspect even the Club don't know the duplicate tally there given they are in a different database. 

The Club doesn’t know the headroom and could be inundated. If its claims about the worldwide diaspora is correct they should be even given that we are someway behind Leeds in this regard.