Injuries ahead of Northampton. Starting 11?

[Crazy Eddie 0]

No Lisbie, Marney, Davenport for definate through injury/suspension, and ? over Ashton and McVeigh who are also carrying knocks and might not make it. Supposing we were without ALL of those, what 11 would you field?

[Pete Raven 276]

Green

Colin, Shackell, Doherty, Drury

Jarrett, Hughes, Safri, Henderson

Huckerby, Jarvis

Although I reckon McVeigh and Ashton will play, so replace them with Henderson and Jarvis.

[DumbleDelia is Magic 0]

I''d play:

      Greeno

Colin  Doc Shacks  Drury

   Saf  Hughes  WLY

        Hucks

    Deano  Jarvis

IMO we can''t take tonight lightly.  We found that out a couple of seasons ago

[ZLF 335]

[quote]I''d play: Greeno Colin Doc Shacks Drury Saf Hughes WLY Hucks Deano Jarvis IMO we can''t take tonight lightly. We found that out a couple of seasons ago[/quote]

I''d take it lightly - getting up the league and winning against reading is the key game this week; injuries - sminjuries - allows us to play a weakened squad without getting censured bythe football league. 

                       Gallagher

Cave-Brown Fleming Shackell  Brennan

         Jarrett Rossi Jarvis  Hughes 

                         WLY 

                 Jarvis   Henderson 

Mix of experince and inexperience (and a chance for Flem & shacks to regain confidence) while protecting our best players - play to win but not bothered if we dont - excellent development opportunity for our younger players.

A defeat for a full sgrength team would also hit confidence

OTBC

[Mark .Y. 375]

Totally agree Zipper, golden opportunity to give some of the lads a rest and some others a game. I had been wondering whether Ashton has been carrying a slight knock and I see no point at all in risking him.

I would actually rest Hughes as well and give JB another game.

Mark .Y.

[shyster 0]

[quote]No Lisbie, Marney, Davenport for definate through injury/suspension, and ? over Ashton and McVeigh who are also carrying knocks and might not make it. Supposing we were without ALL of those, what 11 w...[/quote]

5-3-2 Attacking formation:-

Green

Drury - DCL

Doherty - DC

Colin - DCR

Brennan - DML/Attacking

Hughes - MC

Jarrett - MC

Huckerby - DMR/Attacking

Safri - AMC

Henderson

Jarvis

Subs: Whoever''s fit

[alex_ncfc 686]

I reckon that tonight will see the return of Craig Fleming. Don''t know why, just have my suspicions!!

[shyster 0]

[quote]I reckon that tonight will see the return of Craig Fleming. Don''t know why, just have my suspicions!![/quote]

You can bet your bottom dollar on it, which is a shame, because if anybody should play in defence with the inform Doherty, Colin & Drury it should be Shackell -- Assuming Worthers will inevitably be playing 4 across the back, which is a negative in my opinion as City should be all out attack in this particular tie -- Depending on availability, the formation, players & tactics I''ve suggested I''m sure would work in building a two goal lead then maybe revert to 4-4-2 with Shackell coming on for a midfielder to save some legs -- Fleming should be 2nd choice sub & maybe come on in the latter stages, once again, to save weary legs.

[Meeky 0]

Ho hum more rumours.

Team for tonight

-Ward is in goal
-Fleming is playing right back and rossi jarvis is on the bench and will replace him after half time. Docs is def centre back, probably partnering shacks.
- Jarrett is playing in midfield, with safri on the bench
- Hendo is playing just behind the strikers, which are Hucks and Jarvis
- Deano on bench

[AJ 1,359]

[quote]Green Colin, Shackell, Doherty, Drury Jarrett, Hughes, Safri, Henderson Huckerby, Jarvis Although I reckon McVeigh and Ashton will play, so replace them with Henderson and Jarvis.[/quote]

in that case id do this:

Green

Colin, Shackell, Doherty, Drury

Jarrett, Hughes, Safri, Huckerby

Mcveigh, Ashton

[Northern Canary 0]

                     Ward

Colin   Fleming   Shackell   Drury

[Northern Canary 0]

                     Ward

Colin   Fleming   Shackell   Drury

[Northern Canary 0]

                     Ward

Colin   Fleming   Shackell   Drury

Marney  Jarrett   R.Jarvis   Huckerby

         McVeigh    Jarvis

[Tom Blazak<P><IMG src="http:new.pinkun.comforumsimagesline.gif"><BR>Tom Blazak<P><P>Ronaldinho - The Huckerby Of The Nou Camp<P> 0]

meeky - stunning - u must be insider of some kind!! totally right again as u were with ur rumours for the scummers - are u worthy or something?!?! lol

[Northern Canary 0]

what do you guys think of the line up?

Im very pleased, i dont take carling cup too seriously so i think its the perfect time to give hendo and jarvis''s a run out. Along with Jarrett getting a full game.

btw, huckerby just scored a penalty.

[Meeky 0]

[quote]meeky - stunning - u must be insider of some kind!! totally right again as u were with ur rumours for the scummers - are u worthy or something?!?! lol[/quote]

Ha ha Tom, Worthy I''m not, just pick up little snippets of information from time to time.

[gazzathegreat 0]

[quote]meeky - stunning - u must be insider of some kind!! totally right again as u were with ur rumours for the scummers - are u worthy or something?!?! lol[/quote]

tom

i can categorically state that meeky is NOT worthy

please consider that i would have more taste than that 

[YankeeCanary 0]

Hi gazza. I know your response was directed to Tom but I also found myself pondering whether your taste could possibly extend to Worthy. Let''s see now....Worthy repeats the same gibberish constantly, when others have a different point of view to him he refuses to speak to them, when it comes to the dance floor he''s too much of a hoofer and last, but certainly not least, he''s obviously got one favourite position that he refuses to change. Okay, I tend to agree with you....I think you must have better taste than that so Meeky, therefore, can not be Worthy.

[Meeky 0]

[quote]Hi gazza. I know your response was directed to Tom but I also found myself pondering whether your taste could possibly extend to Worthy. Let''s see now....Worthy repeats the same gibberish constantly, ...[/quote]

That made me chuckle Yankee. You wait til Gazza reads it though.

;o)

[gazzathegreat 0]

[quote]Hi gazza. I know your response was directed to Tom but I also found myself pondering whether your taste could possibly extend to Worthy. Let''s see now....Worthy repeats the same gibberish constantly, ...[/quote]

Hi yankee

no my taste is only directed to meeky at the moment, as you know, worthy isn''t my kind of guy!!

i prefer balls to feet myself and if i had stuck to the same person for as long as worthy does i would probably be married and going for a long service award  lol

nice to hear from you yankee, and yes, you made me laugh! 

[Meeky 0]

[quote]Hi yankee no my taste is only directed to meeky at the moment, as you know, worthy isn''t my kind of guy!! i prefer balls to feet myself and if i had stuck to the same person for as long as worthy do...[/quote]

Blimey! Didn''t realise you had a foot fetish Gazza. Looks like I will have to have a serious look at the tactical side of things?

Hmmm perhaps a visit to that new club opening in Prince of Wales Road will be in order, perhaps I might learn something?

Thinking of it, perhaps Worthy might get some ideas as well. I''m sure balls and feet will figure somewhere!