***

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"] [quote user="The Great Mass Debater"]This board is far too personal a lot of the time. Wish we could stick to discussing the football without squabbles descending into p*ssing contests or a trade of insults. Its sad that people dont want to post here anymore[/quote]   Including me from this evening. [/quote] Flouncing off, as you made an idiot of yourself? Bye. [/quote]   Tis true I bring a lot of flack my way, and yes, its my fault I quess to a point, but there comes a time when you lot just disgust me....that time is now.

[quote user="The Great Mass Debater"]This board is far too personal a lot of the time. Wish we could stick to discussing the football without squabbles descending into p*ssing contests or a trade of insults. Its sad that people dont want to post here anymore[/quote]   Including me from this evening.

[quote user="City1st"][quote user="Wiz"]I often have lunch in Yellows, so no Sky will pi*s me off somewhat.[/quote] dear old Billy Liar ..... only a little while back he was telling us he did not attend games as he could not afford it or was in a wheelchair, but happily was able to climb the stairs to sit in the Barclay ps any photos of you with that cat ? [/quote]   Did I say who paid Pompous?................disengage mouth Pompous..............engage brain.

[quote user="ricardo"][quote user="Eadies Left Huckss Right Iwans Heed"] This is a must win obviously but I feel with the transfer window approaching if we lose then the board need to act and make the change, I would go for Solskjaer before Cardiff snap him up (Although I thing SAF has advised him against it?)   Obviously I want us to win though!!! [/quote] No such thing as a must win at this stage of the season. [/quote]   Sadly, I fear ricardo that your prediction, re CH still here in May will be spot on........if that is the case, we wll have been relegated.   So no, I don''t think its a must win either.

Sadly, us and two others.[:(]

Chippy was right.......oh dear:   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/10541791/Premier-League-report-Telegraph-Sport-experts-give-their-verdict-at-the-halfway-stage-of-the-season.html

[quote user="basil brush"]Its an open secret that Mackay didn''t get on with previous directors and certainly the Stowmarket two. As they are still here I would find it difficult to see how Mackay would be happy to come back to Norwich - if offered - though McNally pulls the strings now. I like Mackay and prefer him to what we currently have in the negative Hughton, but I''m not sure if its the right moment to bring him back to NCFC.[/quote]   I always thought Worthy made that call Basil.

If, as I expect, Palace do us Wednesday, what excuse will LDC come up with then?   The mind boggels.

I often have lunch in Yellows, so no Sky will pi*s me off somewhat.

[quote user="ricardo"][quote user="Wiz"] CH was a coward yesteday, rather than take a risk against a very weakend Manure side and try and equalize, he mentally settled for a 1 nil defeat .   He has to go. [/quote] He will still be here in May old pal, so you will have the entire summer to carry on with your campaign.[;)] [/quote]   His position will be long untenable by then. ....................so don''t be too cock sure.

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"] [quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"]Whats the point?....CH will either bench them, play them out of position or drop them.[/quote] Congratulations. Out of all the ridiculous, petty statements you have made recently, this one wins the award for "Statement that sounds most like a teenage girl folding her arms and sticking her bottom lip out" [/quote]   True............but I''m still right! [/quote] No. You''re really not. [/quote]   Search your inner feelings morty, right, you know I am. [/quote] Give over. You''re not some sort of wise sage, you''re just a silly old man. [/quote]   Oh young man, are you a nice young man, young man?

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"] [quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"]Whats the point?....CH will either bench them, play them out of position or drop them.[/quote] Congratulations. Out of all the ridiculous, petty statements you have made recently, this one wins the award for "Statement that sounds most like a teenage girl folding her arms and sticking her bottom lip out" [/quote]   True............but I''m still right! [/quote] No. You''re really not. [/quote]   Search your inner feelings morty, right, you know I am.

CH was a coward yesteday, rather than take a risk against a very weakend Manure side and try and equalize, he mentally settled for a 1 nil defeat .   He has to go.

[quote user="City 2nd"]Ricardo wrote: I don''t need to prove anything, it''s you that need to prove that sacking a manager improves your results and chances of staying up. Quite plainly it doesn''t. Teams will have little runs of good and bad results................. Errrrrr when exactly have we had a little run of GOOD results in 2013 Ricardo? Seems to me your latter element of this post is quite true, because we have consistently had poor results this year, and there has been NO improvement at all under Hughton. At the AGM I believe Bowkett inferred he expected a top ten finish, and the CEO stated we would soon be in mid table mediocrity. I think both need to converse with each other, and both certainly need to converse with Hughton - but we all know Bowkett has problems talking to the club manager as he couldn''t manage it with Lambert fir over 12 months - if anyone believes Hughton, Calderwood and Trollopeare the man to take NCFC to the next level, they are totally deluded. It will not happen, and relegation will come first.[/quote]   Huzzah! Huzzah! Huzzah![Y]

[quote user="JF"]Completely agree but its hardly the managers fault the players didn''t take the chances is it?[/quote]   But the buck stops with him.

[quote user="JF"]Class is relevant to the team. I would say that Tettey, Pilkington and Turner are major players for us. I want a change of manager and feel Hughton is the wrong man but yesterday we were superb and he got it right.[/quote]   Not for the second half he didn''t, he was insipid, limp of all ideas or tactics, he was cowardly and bloody clueless.....again!

[quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"]Whats the point?....CH will either bench them, play them out of position or drop them.[/quote] Congratulations. Out of all the ridiculous, petty statements you have made recently, this one wins the award for "Statement that sounds most like a teenage girl folding her arms and sticking her bottom lip out" [/quote]   True............but I''m still right!

[quote user="City1st"][quote user="Wiz"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Wiz"] I''m pretty confident that this thread will be reappearing Saturday after another woeful display under Hughton.   You happy clppers like dishing it out, but you just can''t take it back. [/quote]Obvious troll seeking attention, is obvious. [/quote]   Obvious morty the troll seeking attention reply, its obvious. [/quote] Bless. You don''t even know what a troll is. So if we beat Man Utd, will you be changing your stance again? [/quote]   No, because it''ll be just another false dawn.................CH excels in those . [/quote] So, for the record, you are a Hughton outer, and this will never change? Ever? [/quote]   Yes and no.   I want him to do well, he''s a nice bloke, maybe thats the trouble. [/quote] a nice bloke, eh ? one that you have repeatedly referred to as a s od and a b ugger a bloke who you have repeatedly urged the rest of us ''to drive out'' maybe you could explain the contradiction, or maybe not as you have never explained your lies and deceit about supporting the club and attending games at Carrow Road your opinions are worthless as they have NO grounding in belief, principles or reasoned argument - you simply post up what you think will attract the most attention hence the numerous attacks (libellous in some cases) on City players, managers, board members others should see your rantings in the context of those repeated lies and attacks [/quote]   Always the same reply Pompous, no variation, always the same trumped up, and altered allegations, always the dull, pompous replies from a pale shadow of a poster.   My theory is sound, read it again Wednesday!

[quote user="JF"]Pathetic comment Wiz, you can only play who they put out and I would say only missing 2. I believe we were missing a few as well?[/quote]   What, in the Van P, Nani or Rooney''s class JF?

Whats the point?....CH will either bench them, play them out of position or drop them.

[quote user="ricardo"][quote user="Surfer"]Wow. Get out of the wrong side of bed did we ? Today we had 15 shots to their 7 and 8 corners to their 4…[/quote] Don''t confuse people with the facts. There are many on here who have problems with awkward things like facts. [/quote]   You want facts Clappy?   How about Utd missing 4 of their top players yesterday.

I can''t wait to see the excuses from the happy clapppies faithful after the Palace defeat.

[quote user="CDMullins"][quote user="Wiz"] [quote user=" Green and Yellow"]Could the Palace game be Hughton''s last game if city lose ? [/quote]   If we lose?.......bloody hope so, he shouldn''t be here now imo. [/quote] Seriously Wiz, you must have something better to do in your life, than patrolling these boards being a odious boring troll. We know your opinion, its worthless, bore off. [/quote]   Why, because you disagree with it?   Bore off yourself.

[quote user=" Green and Yellow"]Could the Palace game be Hughton''s last game if city lose ? [/quote]   If we lose?.......bloody hope so, he shouldn''t be here now imo.

[quote user="ricardo"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Citizen Journalist Foghorn"][quote user="morty"] I shall counter that with the fact that 4 of their midfielders are easily better than 5 of ours. I think Hughton got things about as right as he could have done today, but you''d never see it that way, would you? [/quote] Well they weren''t in the first half. And yes, if we had made some attempt to change the game in the 2nd half, I would think he did things about as right as he could have done. Sadly in recent games against Fulham and Sunderland we played a 4-4-2, and never switched to a 4-5-1 when the opposition were on top of us in the second half.  Today we played 4-5-1 and with the game running away from us didn''t switch to a 4-4-2 despite the fact the opposition did exactly that. He never trys anything despite being happy to employ both formations in different games. [/quote] The thing is, as someone also said, why should 4-5-1 necessarily be seen as negative? Its generally only 4-5-1 when you don''t have the ball, and more likely 4-3-3 when you do. Its not like flicking a switch just changing formations, especially without making a substitution. You have to have the right players who are comfortable in each system. Depending on pace, ability, spatial awareness etc, some players will play better in some formations, but not in others. I really don''t think he got much wrong today. Personally I think he should stick with 4-5-1, especially if we sign a quality number 10. [/quote] When he goes 451 everyone wants 442, when he goes 442 they want 451. The poor f......r is never going to get it right with some people. At the end of the day, if he keeps us up he will have done o.k. and that''s the bottom line. [/quote]   And if, as I believe, he takes us down?