John Halls

[Bentleys Slicked Back Greasy Hair. 0]

Has been transfer listed by Stoke after rejecting thier latest contract offer. A qaulity centre-bck who can play at right-back, young, strong, quick and described by Arsene Wenger as a hard, hard boy could be the perfect partner for Shackell we have been looking for. IMO Would be a qaulity signing. Come on Worthy, sign him up.

[Ou Est Anselin? 0]

Sign him up without a shadow of a doubt. He is a quality performer and would a great adition to the squad.

[Northern Canary 0]

SOunds good. IF hes transfer listed then Worthy might have a look. How much would he be and isnt he injured?

[KeelansGlove 0]

Just what we are looking for without a doubt. Contract expiring shortly, get him in !

[USA Canary 7]

...BUT, Why is he transfer listed by Stoke? 

[breaker 0]

For once Nigel jump in quickly with both feet and sign the man - he is definately a quality defender - a bit raw but very strong with an excellent footballing education behind him.

[alex_ncfc 686]

[quote]... BUT , Why is he transfer listed by Stoke?[/quote]

Because he could go for free next Summer and they want to try and get some decent money for him now.

[Bentleys Slicked Back Greasy Hair. 0]

As I stated in the original post, he hs been transfer listed because he rejected a new contract, and having less than a year left on his current deal, Stoke dont want to lose him for £nothing.

[AJ 1,358]

[quote]... BUT , Why is he transfer listed by Stoke?[/quote]

because he didnt agree to his new contract.

he didnt sign, thats the simple reason

[Northern Canary 0]

[quote]... BUT , Why is he transfer listed by Stoke?[/quote]

Stoke would rather sell him than let him leave on a free when his contract expires at the end of the month

[DumbleDelia is Magic 0]

[quote]... BUT , Why is he transfer listed by Stoke?[/quote]

Becasue he won''t sign a new contract and they''d rather he left now for a fee instead of leaving next summer for nothing.

Sign him up Nige

[ZLF 334]

[quote]Becasue he won''t sign a new contract and they''d rather he left now for a fee instead of leaving next summer for nothing. Sign him up Nige[/quote]

Isn''t he a right back though?  If we are to sign a defender then it has to be a partner for shacks in the centre.

Wouldnt Calum Davenport be a better option?

 

OTBC

[Dame to Blame 108]

Sorry guys but i have never heard of him.

[Northern Canary 0]

He is a central defender who can play right back i believe. So he would partner shackell ideally

[breaker 0]

Halls is a centre back who has also played midfield recently (and scored) so he fits at least one of Worthy''s criteria - being flexible (small squad, need flexibility blah blah.....).