CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Holts sending off i rewound it several times, yes he went down 2 footed but doesnt seem to get the player at all, and the player gets straight up!!! Not impressed! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted January 23, 2010 2 footed tackle, the intent was there...simples Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Largey 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Was you at the game? He was down for a few minutes. Two footed and miss the ball, you are asking for a red unfortunately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="Largey"]Was you at the game? He was down for a few minutes. Two footed and miss the ball, you are asking for a red unfortunately.[/quote]yesah i was there, down to get holt sent off! he got up wth out a limp! or hop! think the ref should have looked at the 2 foot over the ball before Holt went in! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="Largey"]Was you at the game? He was down for a few minutes. Two footed and miss the ball, you are asking for a red unfortunately.[/quote]if he caught him or not...INTENT is enough im affraid...they r the rules Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lurd 0 Posted January 23, 2010 If someone did that against one of our players, you would be livid.. it was reckless and pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Yeah Intent was there [N] But the other guy went in 2 footed, studs up? [:|] Both should''ve got reds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Largey 0 Posted January 23, 2010 You would have seen the other chap down for a few mins then. I think anyone would be feeling the pain after that, lucky he could carry on! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="city-till-i-die"][quote user="Largey"]Was you at the game? He was down for a few minutes. Two footed and miss the ball, you are asking for a red unfortunately.[/quote]if he caught him or not...INTENT is enough im affraid...they r the rules[/quote]so why wasnt the rule applied to the brentford player coming over the top of the ball???? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="Largey"]You would have seen the other chap down for a few mins then. I think anyone would be feeling the pain after that, lucky he could carry on![/quote]just wind your tv back...HE WASNT IN PAIN!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted January 23, 2010 I love Holt but the ref called it correctly and I''m relieved we are not talking today about a Brentford player with a broken leg. The includeds Holts benefit because he would have to live with it and I honestly think he''s better than that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
G 0 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="CANARYCHARGE"][quote user="city-till-i-die"][quote user="Largey"]Was you at the game? He was down for a few minutes. Two footed and miss the ball, you are asking for a red unfortunately.[/quote]if he caught him or not...INTENT is enough im affraid...they r the rules[/quote]so why wasnt the rule applied to the brentford player coming over the top of the ball????[/quote]cause the referee is a tw4t. Besides, like Lambert said, the whistle should have been blown before Holt was neer the player. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="Brendan"]Yeah Intent was there [N] But the other guy went in 2 footed, studs up? [:|] Both should''ve got reds.[/quote]like i said in another thread...Holty got in before the other guy did....silly but these things happen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="AVFC-NCFC"][quote user="CANARYCHARGE"][quote user="city-till-i-die"][quote user="Largey"]Was you at the game? He was down for a few minutes. Two footed and miss the ball, you are asking for a red unfortunately.[/quote]if he caught him or not...INTENT is enough im affraid...they r the rules[/quote]so why wasnt the rule applied to the brentford player coming over the top of the ball????[/quote]cause the referee is a tw4t. Besides, like Lambert said, the whistle should have been blown before Holt was neer the player.[/quote][Y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="city-till-i-die"][quote user="Brendan"]Yeah Intent was there [N] But the other guy went in 2 footed, studs up? [:|] Both should''ve got reds.[/quote]like i said in another thread...Holty got in before the other guy did....silly but these things happen[/quote]Have u just watched it?? the guy came in over the ball, holt came down after ball had come?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted January 23, 2010 WHY THE HECK DID HE DO IT ANYWAY? ABSOULOUTLY NO NEED! [:|] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="Brendan"]WHY THE HECK DID HE DO IT ANYWAY? ABSOULOUTLY NO NEED! [:|][/quote]FAIR POINT>>>>LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Largey 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Holts foot looked to go between the guys legs, so luckily he didnt catch him full on.I''ll agree to disagree, however I don''t believe the Brentford chap went in two footed, his trailing leg was flailing out rather than full-blooded like Holts.As I said on another thread, I think Holt was trying to get his foot inbetween the Brentford player and the ball, and it went haywire. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,689 Posted January 23, 2010 Holt''s challenge was particularly stupid as we had been given a free-kick - but the ref had slightly delayed before giving it so he presumably didn''t realise when preparing for his lunge. Holt was stupid, and the sending off was probably deserved. ...but most of the other yellow cards were feeble on the part of the ref who didn''t have a good game - Russell''s in particular (who IMO had a great game today). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted January 23, 2010 And its not as if he was really going for the ball, like the other guy way. I mean he just jumped on him? WTF[N] Gotta show more responsibility Holty. I love you, but thats just stupid seeing as though you''re captain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Perhaps the real question is...why has Holt been so edgy lately and why did the red mist come down? Is there anything else behind it? I thought he was happy and settled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted January 23, 2010 [quote user="CANARYCHARGE"][quote user="city-till-i-die"][quote user="Brendan"]Yeah Intent was there [N] But the other guy went in 2 footed, studs up? [:|] Both should''ve got reds.[/quote]like i said in another thread...Holty got in before the other guy did....silly but these things happen[/quote]Have u just watched it?? the guy came in over the ball, holt came down after ball had come??[/quote]yes i did watch it....take the green and yellow glasses of lol...it was a sending off simple as....if it had been the other way around you would be screaming blue murder[Y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lewie - Holt Our Saviour 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Well just out of interest how can holt avoid the tackle without using both feet to jump in the air? Are you all suggesting holt to hop?:P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beauseant 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Unfortunately our heroes sometimes act like dickheads. Holty did so this afternoon, end of story. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted January 23, 2010 Hopefully he will calm down a bit as this should be an eye opener! I havent got a replay so I cant really comment any further though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted January 24, 2010 [quote user="Lewie - Holt our saviour"]Well just out of interest how can holt avoid the tackle without using both feet to jump in the air? Are you all suggesting holt to hop?:P[/quote]he wasnt jumping out of the way lol....he knew exactly what he was doing....it was a silly tackle end of Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Largey 0 Posted January 24, 2010 [quote user="Lewie - Holt our saviour"]Well just out of interest how can holt avoid the tackle without using both feet to jump in the air? Are you all suggesting holt to hop?:P[/quote]If he jumped to avoid it, he wouldn''t have gone in two footed, he would have fell over! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brendo 0 Posted January 24, 2010 Well the ref was about an inch away, so I can hardly doubt him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARY CHARGE 0 Posted January 24, 2010 [quote user="Largey"][quote user="Lewie - Holt our saviour"]Well just out of interest how can holt avoid the tackle without using both feet to jump in the air? Are you all suggesting holt to hop?:P[/quote]If he jumped to avoid it, he wouldn''t have gone in two footed, he would have fell over![/quote]I think ....like u say we will have to agree to disagree on this one! it looked worse then it was! but depending on view of ref, red was an option, i wouldnt be surprised if this one gets rescinded! but watch this space! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lewie - Holt Our Saviour 0 Posted January 24, 2010 [quote user="Largey"][quote user="Lewie - Holt our saviour"]Well just out of interest how can holt avoid the tackle without using both feet to jump in the air? Are you all suggesting holt to hop?:P[/quote]If he jumped to avoid it, he wouldn''t have gone in two footed, he would have fell over![/quote]If you jump over a tackle (which you use both feel for) you don''t fall over unless you lose you balance lol.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites