ncfcrule 0 Posted March 28, 2009 Surely if they are promoted he will be allowed to leave on the cheap?? Even if it is at a loss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana 0 Posted March 29, 2009 too much for us! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted March 29, 2009 I''m hoping around £500k. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted March 29, 2009 about 400kwolves wont need himand he is no prem defenderand wages will be "healthy" sum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JJ 0 Posted March 29, 2009 Depends how much they''ve already paid us for his original fee. Wouldn''t surprise me if the loan spell is costing us very little. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted March 29, 2009 orwolves call him a "useful back up player"he''s a player of Prem experiencethe want to recoup what they bought him forsoo we''ll go in with £300k, they''ll say £1m, we''ll have to meet half way unless some other club comes into the equation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted March 29, 2009 [quote user="Jimmy Smith"]orwolves call him a "useful back up player"he''s a player of Prem experiencethe want to recoup what they bought him forsoo we''ll go in with £300k, they''ll say £1m, we''ll have to meet half way unless some other club comes into the equation[/quote]if wolves get promotedi expect them to spend big in every area. including defence, cant see shackell even being back up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted March 29, 2009 they''re cleverer than to say to us, ''just have him back, we don''t really need the money or him really guys, help yourself'''', more likely, they''ll say, ''well... go on then, but there''s other clubs in for him, also, we could do with getting some money in cos we''re saving up for some big signings, it wouldn''t be the end of the world if we lost him, but as he showed at Norwich on loan, he can do a very good job'' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted March 29, 2009 [quote user="Jimmy Smith"]they''re cleverer than to say to us, ''just have him back, we don''t really need the money or him really guys, help yourself'''', more likely, they''ll say, ''well... go on then, but there''s other clubs in for him, also, we could do with getting some money in cos we''re saving up for some big signings, it wouldn''t be the end of the world if we lost him, but as he showed at Norwich on loan, he can do a very good job''[/quote]that i do agree with.that said, where would shackell WANT to go to?if he kicks his heels and screams a bit. im sure ge would get his own way and wolves would be happy to see his wages off their list. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucky green trainers 0 Posted March 29, 2009 can''t see us being able to afford shax...he would have to take a hefty pay cut... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted March 29, 2009 10p, wolves dont want him. and will just laon him back to us, untill his contract is over, and knowing Norwich, i reckon they havnt even paid half of the transfer fee yet, even if it was 200k :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yorkshire Canary 118 Posted March 30, 2009 [quote user="Jimmy Smith"]I''m hoping around £500k.[/quote] Yes i agree about that sum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted March 30, 2009 I''d still go for out of favour Taylor at Brum, although Shacks has been superb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted March 30, 2009 wonder if the very much in favour taylor mud still cost 1 million? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rjwc22 0 Posted March 30, 2009 Think Taylor would still command a bigger transfer fee and wages than shack, but would love to see him in our colours permanently - great defender. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,219 Posted March 30, 2009 [quote user="First Wizard"]I''d still go for out of favour Taylor at Brum, although Shacks has been superb.[/quote]We could go elsewhere is Wolves want too much - which means it could essentially be in our hands.Either way, I''d like to have him back - Wolves wouldn''t mind making a small loss I hope. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Chirp 0 Posted March 30, 2009 darren purse on a free might be a more likely option. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted March 30, 2009 [quote user="The Chirp"]darren purse on a free might be a more likely option. [/quote]better player. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted March 30, 2009 [quote user="missing in action"][quote user="The Chirp"]darren purse on a free might be a more likely option. [/quote]better player.[/quote]Well he''s in City''s price range then! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tangible Fixed Assets anyone? 0 Posted March 30, 2009 £500k. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites