A Load of Squit 6,260 Posted November 28, 2019 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50578098 Position Club Division D G T Points 1 Exeter City League Two 55 65 50 170 2 AFC Wimbledon League One 45 65 60 170 3 Doncaster Rovers League One 70 65 30 165 4 Carlisle United League Two 60 65 35 160 5 Wycombe Wanderers League One 45 65 50 160 6 Lincoln City League One 60 50 40 150 7 Norwich City Premier League 60 45 30 135 8 Reading Championship 70 25 30 125 9 Portsmouth League One 55 45 25 125 10 Cambridge United League Two 55 50 20 125 Why can't we be Exeter City. 😀 Congrats to all involved, ACN, BEN, NCFSC etc. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 8,754 Posted November 29, 2019 Wonder how we would have done in this during the McNally days. There is no doubt the club has become much more open and transparent in how it communicates with fans these days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted November 29, 2019 Credit to the club and all those involved. Does this include access to photographs of scantily clad players wives? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,610 Posted November 29, 2019 I don't know when they took this sample but it would be a little ironic if the "three of more fan engagement meetings" they cite which have got us so far up the rankings on this were actually the membership scheme meetings which they have only had to hold because they didn't engage with the fans in the first place and p**sed everyone off! That said I think they have learnt their lesson and I have to say they have reacted in the right way with the meetings which were good. Lets hope they are followed through by reasonable and sensible changes to the scheme. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,902 Posted November 29, 2019 Why would that be ironic? They chose to engage with the fans over something they got wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,610 Posted November 29, 2019 16 minutes ago, nutty nigel said: Why would that be ironic? They chose to engage with the fans over something they got wrong. Because had they not "failed to engage" with the fans over the membership scheme then they would not have been forced (due to the fallout) to hold the meetings that are now seeing them praised for fan engagement Nutty. Just strikes me as a tad ironic but as I have said I think they (especially BK) have learnt from it and have ultimately reacted in the right way and will continue to do so moving forward and so praise where its due and long may it continue. He's a good guy and I think was slightly unfairly hung out to dry over the membership scheme. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,902 Posted November 29, 2019 I thought they did engage with some fans before the membership scheme was announced? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 5,960 Posted November 29, 2019 1 hour ago, nutty nigel said: I thought they did engage with some fans before the membership scheme was announced? Yeah, but unless they engage in a way that Jim agrees with, it doesn't count. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Diane 500 Posted November 29, 2019 Thanks for the mention Load of Squit, we at the Norwich City Fans Social Club are proud to play a little part in fan engagement. Think by always having some ncfc officials/staff at our events who mingle and chat to fans before & after it has helped to bring both parties closer together. Im my opinion the club had never been more accessible to us fans than it is now, so if you have an issue or query just contact them. most of the details of people you might need are here https://www.canaries.co.uk/Contact-Us/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
