I like the look of this

[Jim Smith 2,610]

Ruddy

 

Whitaker Turner Bassong Garrido

 

Biglia Nzonzi (or Tettey)

 

Snodgrass/Bennett   H/H/B      Pilkington

 

Holt

 

HHB = Howson, Hoolahan or Butterfield.

 

Fingers crossed!

[kellybrook 0]

I''m sure it looks lovely.  You have heard how settled teams do well?  Too much change there.  Johnson and a new DM perhaps in a 4231.

[Excited Canary 19]

[quote user="Jim Smith"]

Ruddy

 

Whitaker Turner Bassong Garrido

 

Biglia Nzonzi (or Tettey)

 

Snodgrass/Bennett   H/H/B      Pilkington

 

Holt

 

HHB = Howson, Hoolahan or Butterfield.

 

Fingers crossed!

[/quote]Looks good but I still don''t like Holt on his own. With Vaughan going to Huddersfield let''s hope Hughton has an improvement up his sleeve who can play the lone striker role perfectly.

[CanaryNath 30]

Would give much freedom to a ''wing-back'' system, which in turn helps to naturally push our midfield line higher.

[Vazzza 62]

Definitely looks good. I''d prefer Bennett over Turner for a bit of stability. But that formation would work with Holt up front by himself, as previously said the attacking midfield 3 would have much more freedom to support Holt properly, unlike at Fulham!

[Jim Smith 2,610]

[quote user="kellybrook"]I''m sure it looks lovely.  You have heard how settled teams do well?  Too much change there.  Johnson and a new DM perhaps in a 4231.[/quote]

 

Well I think its clear from all the players we are currently buying/trying to buy that Hughton (having seen our settled team in action last weekend) has decided that some more drastic changes are needed. I can;t believe that he will be buying these expensive midfielders not to play them.

[Number 9 0]

Jim, have you left Messi on the bench?