G 0 Posted April 2, 2010 Maybe not quite but even the player himself was shocked to see it given. He looked around with his arms in the air like he was pleading his innocence which turned into an aeroplane celebration. Another posts on this really but i am so f*cking angry its funny. If the lino can see the the ball hit Russell on the arm, even though his arm was by his side and the ball was blasted into it, how didn''t he see there third. The lino should be demoted a few divisions for that. [8-|] [:@] [:$] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heresyourfathersgun 0 Posted April 2, 2010 At least Henry kept a straight face. More than Curran did when interviewed! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Paddons Beard 2,786 Posted April 2, 2010 Curran did have the good grace to blush even though he knew he was lying through his teeth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheGoogler 604 Posted April 2, 2010 I thought his interview was scandalous. Hits his chest my arse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
G 0 Posted April 2, 2010 Having seen the interview with the chap yet but you can''t really blame him. Its like when you see players score when a foul has been given or an offside the just put it in the back of the net. Utter disbelief at how shocking the decisions were. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Fantastic 0 Posted April 2, 2010 Yeah the scouse b@stard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Romantic 0 Posted April 3, 2010 [quote user="G"]Having seen the interview with the chap yet but you can''t really blame him. Its like when you see players score when a foul has been given or an offside the just put it in the back of the net. Utter disbelief at how shocking the decisions were.[/quote]Nope - don''t agree! If it was me I''d have simply said that it did indeed hit my hand, that it wasn''t pre-meditated - just a reflex, that I was surprised to have got the ball under and was happy at my finish. I''d have acknowledged the goals dubiousness but accepted the goal being awarded with a smile as ''one of those things''.So he didn''t have to lie through his teeth on national telly did he? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJL Mid-Norfolk Canary 2,035 Posted April 3, 2010 the biggest difference is that the Ireland fans will probably never come up against the referee who gave Henry''s goal ever again.Chances are that we will encounter Eddie Idlington -Tyne & Wear again one day in the future.....and when that day arrives, hopefully at Carrow Road, he''d better be looking over his shoulder. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
G 0 Posted April 3, 2010 [quote user="Romantic"][quote user="G"]Having seen the interview with the chap yet but you can''t really blame him. Its like when you see players score when a foul has been given or an offside the just put it in the back of the net. Utter disbelief at how shocking the decisions were.[/quote]Nope - don''t agree! If it was me I''d have simply said that it did indeed hit my hand, that it wasn''t pre-meditated - just a reflex, that I was surprised to have got the ball under and was happy at my finish. I''d have acknowledged the goals dubiousness but accepted the goal being awarded with a smile as ''one of those things''.So he didn''t have to lie through his teeth on national telly did he?[/quote]Totally agree with you. I would have done the same. I meant to say haven''t. I said I meant on the pitch i can''t blame him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites