Stephen Hawkings Football Boots 0 Posted July 13, 2009 yes, cant be any worse than cureton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kdncfc 0 Posted July 13, 2009 We probably will but I hope we don''t Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time to go Delia 0 Posted July 13, 2009 What a statement of intent bringing back a player we released on a free 5 years ago , hang your head in shame Bryan Gunn , whos next Phill Mulryne . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dean Coneys boots 1,400 Posted July 13, 2009 surely it wasnt 5 years ago Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time to go Delia 0 Posted July 13, 2009 [quote user="the artist formerly known as VIYAG"]surely it wasnt 5 years ago[/quote] No probably more like 3 but seems longer than that . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shortfatb 0 Posted July 13, 2009 I think we probably will sign him, but on good terms for the club as he''s obviously pretty desperate. If the concern is his fitness, then it should be pay for play, with so many on trial there is obviously competition for places but McVeigh was a talented player when fit whereas some of the triallists probably have been released because they won''t ever make at any pro level. I trust Gunn and Butterworth to be professional enough to determine if McVeigh is still capable of performing at the required level and to not sign him if they don''t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nexus_Canary 1,016 Posted July 13, 2009 Pay as you play, YESfull time contract , NOwhat i think the club will do....Pay as You play, YES Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
missing in action? 0 Posted July 13, 2009 i heard they are "seriously considering" it.i hope its for a fiver a game. its all he is worth atm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
