Gingerpele 0 Posted March 1, 2009 So many times i have asked questions, i was about to ask why is Cligan so good then, but thought, i wont get a proper answer, there are very few one here, there all new questions, or avoid the question with unrelated nonsense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Fish Seller 0 Posted March 1, 2009 What time is it at ten to three? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 10,763 Posted March 1, 2009 I think you''re trying to ask why people rate Clingan?Aside from the past couple of games, he''s been the only real solidity in midfield. I think interest from Fulham shows that. Although they did buy Etuhu. I think he probably just looks good due to his partner being either Fotheringham or Russell.And i''m not a continuous ''Fozzy basher'' either. Thing is, i used to defend him as far as i could, but he''s made that impossible now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unhinged Canary 375 Posted March 1, 2009 How much wood would a wood-chuck chuck, if a wood-chuck would chuck wood? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Fish Seller 0 Posted March 1, 2009 [quote user="Clipped Canary"]How much wood would a wood-chuck chuck, if a wood-chuck would chuck wood?[/quote]I don''t wish to go off topic on this incredibly enthralling and brain taxing thread but shouldn''t that read "How much wood would a wood-chuck chuck, if a wood-chuck could chuck wood?"I have no idea what the answer is I''m guessing at 4 though, am I close? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucky green trainers 0 Posted March 1, 2009 [quote user="Buckethead"]What time is it at ten to three?[/quote]yeah - but the pubs are open all day now!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unhinged Canary 375 Posted March 1, 2009 [quote user="Buckethead"][quote user="Clipped Canary"]How much wood would a wood-chuck chuck, if a wood-chuck would chuck wood?[/quote]I don''t wish to go off topic on this incredibly enthralling and brain taxing thread but shouldn''t that read "How much wood would a wood-chuck chuck, if a wood-chuck could chuck wood?"I have no idea what the answer is I''m guessing at 4 though, am I close?[/quote]A very interesting point BH. I was assuming that the ''Chuck'' in question could in fact chuck wood. I was trying to raise the issue of how much he would, if he so felt the need to do so. (And I''m sticking to it!)[:$] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Holt 580 Posted March 1, 2009 Well said Hoggy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites