Roeder Out???

[Hoolahans Ped 0]

If Roeder goes then it would cost the club money, money we don''t have. A new manager would have to come in, all the backroom staff would have to be replaced to suit the new manager. More money. The new manager would probably want to bring his own players in. More money. I think we have two options:

1) We put up with Roeder and hopefully this season will turn around and we might actually start getting points.

2) If the club does sack Roeder, then i think we should give the job to Clark. He does most of the managing anyway (He takes control of training, He is the person who is down on the touchline most of the game) I think this would work because we wouldn''t have to get new staff. etc...

[singing canary 0]

i think clarke would be a great manager..

[walkern canary 0]

I can see why west ham and newcastle fans called him "glen roeder no where"

[First Wizard 0]

Getting relegated would cost far, far more.

[Fuglestad 0]

[quote user="singing canary"]i think clarke would be a great manager..[/quote]

On what evidence?

[Yellowbeagle 0]

[quote user="1st Wizard"]Getting relegated would cost far, far more.[/quote]

Very true, but i guess given the track record of recuiting managers by the board it''s the fear of the cost of getting relgated and paying off the manager as appossed to just getting relegated. Sad as that is.

[Barry Brockes 157]

I''m not sure I quite understand the logic behind the original post. We should give Clark the job on the basis that he does most of the managing anyway? So he''s largely responsible for getting us where we are. Mmm.

[Ivan Easter 0]

The way we are going at the moment we would be better off without a manager?

[Hoolahans Ped 0]

[quote user="Barry Brockes"]So he''s largely responsible for getting us where we are. Mmm.[/quote]

Unfortunately he hasn''t got full control of the team if he did i''m sure that the team would not be where it is. Also he is a nice guy and not arrogant like Roeder (i think the players would rather play for him than Roeder)

[Yellow Rider 0]

[quote user="walkern canary"]I can see why west ham and newcastle fans called him "glen roeder no where"[/quote]

Were those same fans saying those things in GR''s first months / season at those clubs? Don''t think so. If you admire West Ham fans (some of them) views on GR such as the grotesque......''Tumour boy'' chants then you really do have the knives out for him don''t you? 

[milburn 0]

Does anybody knop how long Roeder has left on his contract? and like with Grant do we have a clause in his contract that if we have a bad run(or continue on this one) then we can sack him for free or a nominal amount?

Personally I think he has to go, Bell the right footer on the left wing and Hollahoop the left footer on the right is just thick. I don''t agree that it would be too costly to replace him either - believe Watford just parted company with a man that would sort us out! If he could bring Malky aswell then all the better!